SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The story of the CIA's Jeffrey Scudder reveals what happens to people in the intelligence community who use so-called "proper procedures" to disclose information. (Image: UNL News Blog)
CIA Employee 'Ruined' for Efforts to Declassify Agency Docs
Case seems to rebuff claims by those who say internal mechanisms exist for would-be whistleblowers like Edward Snowden
Jul 05, 2014
In the controversy surrounding Edward Snowden's decision to leak numerous classified National Security Agency documents, one of the repeated critiques levied by his critics is that the former intelligence contractor should have gone through "propper channels" to voice his concerns about the agency's far-reaching--and what he judged unlawful--surveillance practices.
However, according to new reporting by the Washington Post's Greg Miller, a similarly concerned CIA agent who attempted to get information he thought the public had a right to know discovered just how difficult and perilous efforts to "work within the system" can be.
Miller's report tells the tale of Jeffrey Scudder, a veteran CIA employee, whose career faltered after he made efforts to have long-classified agency materials--"a stack of articles, hundreds of histories of long-dormant conflicts and operations"--released to the public.
As part of his effort, Scudder submitted a completely lawful Freedom of Information Act request, which set off a "harrowing sequence" of events. According to Miller, Scudder "was confronted by supervisors and accused of mishandling classified information while assembling his FOIA request. His house was raided by the FBI and his family's computers seized." The fifty-one-year ultimately resigned after being threatened that if he did not, he risked losing portions of his pension.
"I submitted a FOIA and it basically destroyed my entire career," Scudder told the Post in an interview. "What was this whole exercise for?"
What happened to Scudder, Miller points out,
highlights the risks to workers who take on their powerful spy-agency employers. Senior U.S. intelligence officials have repeatedly argued that Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor, should have done more to raise his concerns internally rather than exposing America's espionage secrets to the world. Others who tried to do that have said they were punished.
Scudder's actions appear to have posed no perceptible risk to national security, but he found himself in the cross hairs of the CIA and FBI.
As journalist Glenn Greenwald noted in response to the article:
______________________________
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In the controversy surrounding Edward Snowden's decision to leak numerous classified National Security Agency documents, one of the repeated critiques levied by his critics is that the former intelligence contractor should have gone through "propper channels" to voice his concerns about the agency's far-reaching--and what he judged unlawful--surveillance practices.
However, according to new reporting by the Washington Post's Greg Miller, a similarly concerned CIA agent who attempted to get information he thought the public had a right to know discovered just how difficult and perilous efforts to "work within the system" can be.
Miller's report tells the tale of Jeffrey Scudder, a veteran CIA employee, whose career faltered after he made efforts to have long-classified agency materials--"a stack of articles, hundreds of histories of long-dormant conflicts and operations"--released to the public.
As part of his effort, Scudder submitted a completely lawful Freedom of Information Act request, which set off a "harrowing sequence" of events. According to Miller, Scudder "was confronted by supervisors and accused of mishandling classified information while assembling his FOIA request. His house was raided by the FBI and his family's computers seized." The fifty-one-year ultimately resigned after being threatened that if he did not, he risked losing portions of his pension.
"I submitted a FOIA and it basically destroyed my entire career," Scudder told the Post in an interview. "What was this whole exercise for?"
What happened to Scudder, Miller points out,
highlights the risks to workers who take on their powerful spy-agency employers. Senior U.S. intelligence officials have repeatedly argued that Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor, should have done more to raise his concerns internally rather than exposing America's espionage secrets to the world. Others who tried to do that have said they were punished.
Scudder's actions appear to have posed no perceptible risk to national security, but he found himself in the cross hairs of the CIA and FBI.
As journalist Glenn Greenwald noted in response to the article:
______________________________
In the controversy surrounding Edward Snowden's decision to leak numerous classified National Security Agency documents, one of the repeated critiques levied by his critics is that the former intelligence contractor should have gone through "propper channels" to voice his concerns about the agency's far-reaching--and what he judged unlawful--surveillance practices.
However, according to new reporting by the Washington Post's Greg Miller, a similarly concerned CIA agent who attempted to get information he thought the public had a right to know discovered just how difficult and perilous efforts to "work within the system" can be.
Miller's report tells the tale of Jeffrey Scudder, a veteran CIA employee, whose career faltered after he made efforts to have long-classified agency materials--"a stack of articles, hundreds of histories of long-dormant conflicts and operations"--released to the public.
As part of his effort, Scudder submitted a completely lawful Freedom of Information Act request, which set off a "harrowing sequence" of events. According to Miller, Scudder "was confronted by supervisors and accused of mishandling classified information while assembling his FOIA request. His house was raided by the FBI and his family's computers seized." The fifty-one-year ultimately resigned after being threatened that if he did not, he risked losing portions of his pension.
"I submitted a FOIA and it basically destroyed my entire career," Scudder told the Post in an interview. "What was this whole exercise for?"
What happened to Scudder, Miller points out,
highlights the risks to workers who take on their powerful spy-agency employers. Senior U.S. intelligence officials have repeatedly argued that Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor, should have done more to raise his concerns internally rather than exposing America's espionage secrets to the world. Others who tried to do that have said they were punished.
Scudder's actions appear to have posed no perceptible risk to national security, but he found himself in the cross hairs of the CIA and FBI.
As journalist Glenn Greenwald noted in response to the article:
______________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.