(Image: Shutterstock)
Jul 04, 2014
In a victory for environmental campaigners fighting to prevent the use of bee-killing pesticides, the agrochemical giant Syngenta on Friday withdrew an emergency application seeking permission to use such chemicals in the UK this planting season.
As the Guardian Damian Carrington reports:
Syngenta's neonicotinoid pesticide was given a two-year ban by the European Union in 2013 due to research linking it to serious harm in bees. Neonicotinoids are the world's most widely used insecticide and in June an international scientific review concluded that contamination was so pervasive it threatened global food production.
Syngenta argued that there was a future pest threat to oil seed crops that justified an emergency exemption and the government's advisory committee on pesticides said the criteria for an exemption had been met, although the evidence of the threat was not made public.
As part of a coalition to uphold a ban on the European use of neonicotinoids, a class of chemicals used in pesticides shown to be extremely harmful to pollinating bees, both Friends of the Earth and Avaaz were among those who reacted to Syngenta's decision with celebration.
"Our under-threat bees can breathe a bit easier," said Andrew Pendleton, a coordinator with Friends of the Earth, in a statement. "We're delighted Syngenta has withdrawn this application. The scientific evidence linking neonicotinoid pesticides to bee decline is stacking up. Ministers are currently finalising their action plan for protecting Britain's bees and it must get tough on all the causes of bee decline, including pesticides."
Emma Hockridge, head of policy at the UK-based Soil Association, called the decision "a victory for pollinators and for science." She continued, "There was no good reason for allowing this derogation and the impact could have been catastrophic."
And Bert Wander, a campaign organizers with Avaaz, said: "It's great news that the huge swarm of protest killed off Syngenta's attempts to try and keep their bee-killing poisons in Britain's fields. We welcome their withdrawal and we hope this is the end of it."
Though Europe has maintained its ban and campaigners continue to press for stronger protections for the world's most effective pollinating species, efforts in the U.S. to ban these pesticides and other toxins have continued to falter despite the growing threat.
_______________________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a victory for environmental campaigners fighting to prevent the use of bee-killing pesticides, the agrochemical giant Syngenta on Friday withdrew an emergency application seeking permission to use such chemicals in the UK this planting season.
As the Guardian Damian Carrington reports:
Syngenta's neonicotinoid pesticide was given a two-year ban by the European Union in 2013 due to research linking it to serious harm in bees. Neonicotinoids are the world's most widely used insecticide and in June an international scientific review concluded that contamination was so pervasive it threatened global food production.
Syngenta argued that there was a future pest threat to oil seed crops that justified an emergency exemption and the government's advisory committee on pesticides said the criteria for an exemption had been met, although the evidence of the threat was not made public.
As part of a coalition to uphold a ban on the European use of neonicotinoids, a class of chemicals used in pesticides shown to be extremely harmful to pollinating bees, both Friends of the Earth and Avaaz were among those who reacted to Syngenta's decision with celebration.
"Our under-threat bees can breathe a bit easier," said Andrew Pendleton, a coordinator with Friends of the Earth, in a statement. "We're delighted Syngenta has withdrawn this application. The scientific evidence linking neonicotinoid pesticides to bee decline is stacking up. Ministers are currently finalising their action plan for protecting Britain's bees and it must get tough on all the causes of bee decline, including pesticides."
Emma Hockridge, head of policy at the UK-based Soil Association, called the decision "a victory for pollinators and for science." She continued, "There was no good reason for allowing this derogation and the impact could have been catastrophic."
And Bert Wander, a campaign organizers with Avaaz, said: "It's great news that the huge swarm of protest killed off Syngenta's attempts to try and keep their bee-killing poisons in Britain's fields. We welcome their withdrawal and we hope this is the end of it."
Though Europe has maintained its ban and campaigners continue to press for stronger protections for the world's most effective pollinating species, efforts in the U.S. to ban these pesticides and other toxins have continued to falter despite the growing threat.
_______________________________
In a victory for environmental campaigners fighting to prevent the use of bee-killing pesticides, the agrochemical giant Syngenta on Friday withdrew an emergency application seeking permission to use such chemicals in the UK this planting season.
As the Guardian Damian Carrington reports:
Syngenta's neonicotinoid pesticide was given a two-year ban by the European Union in 2013 due to research linking it to serious harm in bees. Neonicotinoids are the world's most widely used insecticide and in June an international scientific review concluded that contamination was so pervasive it threatened global food production.
Syngenta argued that there was a future pest threat to oil seed crops that justified an emergency exemption and the government's advisory committee on pesticides said the criteria for an exemption had been met, although the evidence of the threat was not made public.
As part of a coalition to uphold a ban on the European use of neonicotinoids, a class of chemicals used in pesticides shown to be extremely harmful to pollinating bees, both Friends of the Earth and Avaaz were among those who reacted to Syngenta's decision with celebration.
"Our under-threat bees can breathe a bit easier," said Andrew Pendleton, a coordinator with Friends of the Earth, in a statement. "We're delighted Syngenta has withdrawn this application. The scientific evidence linking neonicotinoid pesticides to bee decline is stacking up. Ministers are currently finalising their action plan for protecting Britain's bees and it must get tough on all the causes of bee decline, including pesticides."
Emma Hockridge, head of policy at the UK-based Soil Association, called the decision "a victory for pollinators and for science." She continued, "There was no good reason for allowing this derogation and the impact could have been catastrophic."
And Bert Wander, a campaign organizers with Avaaz, said: "It's great news that the huge swarm of protest killed off Syngenta's attempts to try and keep their bee-killing poisons in Britain's fields. We welcome their withdrawal and we hope this is the end of it."
Though Europe has maintained its ban and campaigners continue to press for stronger protections for the world's most effective pollinating species, efforts in the U.S. to ban these pesticides and other toxins have continued to falter despite the growing threat.
_______________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.