Jun 20, 2014
An effort in the House of Representatives to prevent combat operations in Iraq, championed by war critic Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), was defeated Thursday night, in what critics warn further clears the path for a new war.
Lee on Thursday introduced amendments to the 2015 Department of Defense appropriations bill to cut off federal funding for a potential renewed war in Iraq and the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq.
"We must not let history repeat itself in Iraq," Lee declared in a press statement about the amendments. "Because the reality is there is no military solution in Iraq."
Lee, who issued the only congressional vote against the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force and has been an outspoken critic of the Iraq War since before it started, was defeated on both measures Thursday night, with her bid to cut off funding for combat operations in Iraq rejected 165 to 250, the Hillreports.
Stephen Miles of Win Without War told Common Dreams, "Americans, by wide margins, want to see our troops home from Afghanistan and do not support restarting the Iraq War. Unfortunately, some in Congress seem all too willing to put Americans back into the middle of a civil war in Iraq."
Lee also introduced an amendment to end the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force--which has been interpreted expansively to justify war in Afghanistan, secret renditions, drone strikes and more--at the end of this year. That measure was defeated 157 to 260.
The defeats came the same day that President Obama announced he is deploying 300 special operations "military advisers" to Iraq, preparing for potential strikes, and increasing intelligence cooperation with the Iraqi government, in what critics warn constitute serious steps towards military attacks, including drone strikes.
"The biggest disappointment is seeing Obama sitting there saying there is no military solution in Iraq while making moves for military intervention," said Maggie Martin of Iraq Veterans Against the War in an interview with Common Dreams. "It is upsetting that even though the public doesn't want this and it's not the will of the people, it feels like we're powerless to stop it."
_____________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
An effort in the House of Representatives to prevent combat operations in Iraq, championed by war critic Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), was defeated Thursday night, in what critics warn further clears the path for a new war.
Lee on Thursday introduced amendments to the 2015 Department of Defense appropriations bill to cut off federal funding for a potential renewed war in Iraq and the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq.
"We must not let history repeat itself in Iraq," Lee declared in a press statement about the amendments. "Because the reality is there is no military solution in Iraq."
Lee, who issued the only congressional vote against the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force and has been an outspoken critic of the Iraq War since before it started, was defeated on both measures Thursday night, with her bid to cut off funding for combat operations in Iraq rejected 165 to 250, the Hillreports.
Stephen Miles of Win Without War told Common Dreams, "Americans, by wide margins, want to see our troops home from Afghanistan and do not support restarting the Iraq War. Unfortunately, some in Congress seem all too willing to put Americans back into the middle of a civil war in Iraq."
Lee also introduced an amendment to end the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force--which has been interpreted expansively to justify war in Afghanistan, secret renditions, drone strikes and more--at the end of this year. That measure was defeated 157 to 260.
The defeats came the same day that President Obama announced he is deploying 300 special operations "military advisers" to Iraq, preparing for potential strikes, and increasing intelligence cooperation with the Iraqi government, in what critics warn constitute serious steps towards military attacks, including drone strikes.
"The biggest disappointment is seeing Obama sitting there saying there is no military solution in Iraq while making moves for military intervention," said Maggie Martin of Iraq Veterans Against the War in an interview with Common Dreams. "It is upsetting that even though the public doesn't want this and it's not the will of the people, it feels like we're powerless to stop it."
_____________________
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
An effort in the House of Representatives to prevent combat operations in Iraq, championed by war critic Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), was defeated Thursday night, in what critics warn further clears the path for a new war.
Lee on Thursday introduced amendments to the 2015 Department of Defense appropriations bill to cut off federal funding for a potential renewed war in Iraq and the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq.
"We must not let history repeat itself in Iraq," Lee declared in a press statement about the amendments. "Because the reality is there is no military solution in Iraq."
Lee, who issued the only congressional vote against the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force and has been an outspoken critic of the Iraq War since before it started, was defeated on both measures Thursday night, with her bid to cut off funding for combat operations in Iraq rejected 165 to 250, the Hillreports.
Stephen Miles of Win Without War told Common Dreams, "Americans, by wide margins, want to see our troops home from Afghanistan and do not support restarting the Iraq War. Unfortunately, some in Congress seem all too willing to put Americans back into the middle of a civil war in Iraq."
Lee also introduced an amendment to end the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force--which has been interpreted expansively to justify war in Afghanistan, secret renditions, drone strikes and more--at the end of this year. That measure was defeated 157 to 260.
The defeats came the same day that President Obama announced he is deploying 300 special operations "military advisers" to Iraq, preparing for potential strikes, and increasing intelligence cooperation with the Iraqi government, in what critics warn constitute serious steps towards military attacks, including drone strikes.
"The biggest disappointment is seeing Obama sitting there saying there is no military solution in Iraq while making moves for military intervention," said Maggie Martin of Iraq Veterans Against the War in an interview with Common Dreams. "It is upsetting that even though the public doesn't want this and it's not the will of the people, it feels like we're powerless to stop it."
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.