SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
New 'Net Neutrality' Bill Good Step, But Not Enough, say Internet Advocates
Open Internet groups continue to push for reclassification of broadband to deter 'pay-for-play' web
Jun 17, 2014
A new bill banning "fast lanes" on the Internet was unveiled in both the Senate and House on Tuesday.
The bill, dubbed the the Online Competition and Consumer Choice Act, was introduced by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Representative Doris Matsui (D-Calif.).
"Americans [...] want an Internet that is a platform for free expression and innovation, where the best ideas and services can reach consumers based on merit rather than based on a financial relationship with a broadband provider," said Leahy in a press statement.
"Our country cannot afford 'pay-for-play' schemes that divide our Internet into tiers based on who has the deepest pockets," added Matsui.
However, consumer groups and advocates of net neutrality are skeptical that the legislation will go far enough to limit efforts by corporate telecom companies such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon to create a "two-tiered" Internet by offering faster service to those who can afford the fee.
The legislation does not grant the Federal Communications Commission any new regulatory powers. Rather, it directs the agency to "rely on its current authorities" to prevent Internet Service Providers (or ISPs) from providing paid prioritization for certain types of content.
Calling the bill "a step in the right direction," Timothy Karr, senior director at Free Press, told Common Dreams that the group is pleased that members of Congress are taking a stand against the "dangerous practice of prioritization."
However, Karr said that the best way to "protect real net neutrality" is for the FCC to reclassify broadband services as common carriers. Such a move would subject ISPs to greater regulation, much like a utility. "The FCC should move swiftly to do this," Karr added.
According to the senator's office, the legislation would require the FCC to "prohibit paid prioritization agreements between Internet Service Provider's (ISP) and content providers on the last mile Internet connection, the connection between the ISP and the consumer." Further, it would "prohibit broadband providers from prioritizing or otherwise giving preferential treatment to its own last mile Internet traffic or the traffic of its affiliates over the traffic of others."
The proposal comes as the FCC weighs a new plan put forth by current FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler that would grant major ISPs the ability to give preferential treatment to certain content.
The FCC is currently accepting public comment on their proposed rule.
_____________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
A new bill banning "fast lanes" on the Internet was unveiled in both the Senate and House on Tuesday.
The bill, dubbed the the Online Competition and Consumer Choice Act, was introduced by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Representative Doris Matsui (D-Calif.).
"Americans [...] want an Internet that is a platform for free expression and innovation, where the best ideas and services can reach consumers based on merit rather than based on a financial relationship with a broadband provider," said Leahy in a press statement.
"Our country cannot afford 'pay-for-play' schemes that divide our Internet into tiers based on who has the deepest pockets," added Matsui.
However, consumer groups and advocates of net neutrality are skeptical that the legislation will go far enough to limit efforts by corporate telecom companies such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon to create a "two-tiered" Internet by offering faster service to those who can afford the fee.
The legislation does not grant the Federal Communications Commission any new regulatory powers. Rather, it directs the agency to "rely on its current authorities" to prevent Internet Service Providers (or ISPs) from providing paid prioritization for certain types of content.
Calling the bill "a step in the right direction," Timothy Karr, senior director at Free Press, told Common Dreams that the group is pleased that members of Congress are taking a stand against the "dangerous practice of prioritization."
However, Karr said that the best way to "protect real net neutrality" is for the FCC to reclassify broadband services as common carriers. Such a move would subject ISPs to greater regulation, much like a utility. "The FCC should move swiftly to do this," Karr added.
According to the senator's office, the legislation would require the FCC to "prohibit paid prioritization agreements between Internet Service Provider's (ISP) and content providers on the last mile Internet connection, the connection between the ISP and the consumer." Further, it would "prohibit broadband providers from prioritizing or otherwise giving preferential treatment to its own last mile Internet traffic or the traffic of its affiliates over the traffic of others."
The proposal comes as the FCC weighs a new plan put forth by current FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler that would grant major ISPs the ability to give preferential treatment to certain content.
The FCC is currently accepting public comment on their proposed rule.
_____________________
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
A new bill banning "fast lanes" on the Internet was unveiled in both the Senate and House on Tuesday.
The bill, dubbed the the Online Competition and Consumer Choice Act, was introduced by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Representative Doris Matsui (D-Calif.).
"Americans [...] want an Internet that is a platform for free expression and innovation, where the best ideas and services can reach consumers based on merit rather than based on a financial relationship with a broadband provider," said Leahy in a press statement.
"Our country cannot afford 'pay-for-play' schemes that divide our Internet into tiers based on who has the deepest pockets," added Matsui.
However, consumer groups and advocates of net neutrality are skeptical that the legislation will go far enough to limit efforts by corporate telecom companies such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon to create a "two-tiered" Internet by offering faster service to those who can afford the fee.
The legislation does not grant the Federal Communications Commission any new regulatory powers. Rather, it directs the agency to "rely on its current authorities" to prevent Internet Service Providers (or ISPs) from providing paid prioritization for certain types of content.
Calling the bill "a step in the right direction," Timothy Karr, senior director at Free Press, told Common Dreams that the group is pleased that members of Congress are taking a stand against the "dangerous practice of prioritization."
However, Karr said that the best way to "protect real net neutrality" is for the FCC to reclassify broadband services as common carriers. Such a move would subject ISPs to greater regulation, much like a utility. "The FCC should move swiftly to do this," Karr added.
According to the senator's office, the legislation would require the FCC to "prohibit paid prioritization agreements between Internet Service Provider's (ISP) and content providers on the last mile Internet connection, the connection between the ISP and the consumer." Further, it would "prohibit broadband providers from prioritizing or otherwise giving preferential treatment to its own last mile Internet traffic or the traffic of its affiliates over the traffic of others."
The proposal comes as the FCC weighs a new plan put forth by current FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler that would grant major ISPs the ability to give preferential treatment to certain content.
The FCC is currently accepting public comment on their proposed rule.
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.