New 'Net Neutrality' Bill Good Step, But Not Enough, say Internet Advocates
Open Internet groups continue to push for reclassification of broadband to deter 'pay-for-play' web
A new bill banning "fast lanes" on the Internet was unveiled in both the Senate and House on Tuesday.
The bill, dubbed the the Online Competition and Consumer Choice Act, was introduced by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Representative Doris Matsui (D-Calif.).
"Americans [...] want an Internet that is a platform for free expression and innovation, where the best ideas and services can reach consumers based on merit rather than based on a financial relationship with a broadband provider," said Leahy in a press statement.
"Our country cannot afford 'pay-for-play' schemes that divide our Internet into tiers based on who has the deepest pockets," added Matsui.
However, consumer groups and advocates of net neutrality are skeptical that the legislation will go far enough to limit efforts by corporate telecom companies such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon to create a "two-tiered" Internet by offering faster service to those who can afford the fee.
The legislation does not grant the Federal Communications Commission any new regulatory powers. Rather, it directs the agency to "rely on its current authorities" to prevent Internet Service Providers (or ISPs) from providing paid prioritization for certain types of content.
Calling the bill "a step in the right direction," Timothy Karr, senior director at Free Press, told Common Dreams that the group is pleased that members of Congress are taking a stand against the "dangerous practice of prioritization."
However, Karr said that the best way to "protect real net neutrality" is for the FCC to reclassify broadband services as common carriers. Such a move would subject ISPs to greater regulation, much like a utility. "The FCC should move swiftly to do this," Karr added.
According to the senator's office, the legislation would require the FCC to "prohibit paid prioritization agreements between Internet Service Provider's (ISP) and content providers on the last mile Internet connection, the connection between the ISP and the consumer." Further, it would "prohibit broadband providers from prioritizing or otherwise giving preferential treatment to its own last mile Internet traffic or the traffic of its affiliates over the traffic of others."
The proposal comes as the FCC weighs a new plan put forth by current FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler that would grant major ISPs the ability to give preferential treatment to certain content.
The FCC is currently accepting public comment on their proposed rule.
_____________________
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
A new bill banning "fast lanes" on the Internet was unveiled in both the Senate and House on Tuesday.
The bill, dubbed the the Online Competition and Consumer Choice Act, was introduced by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Representative Doris Matsui (D-Calif.).
"Americans [...] want an Internet that is a platform for free expression and innovation, where the best ideas and services can reach consumers based on merit rather than based on a financial relationship with a broadband provider," said Leahy in a press statement.
"Our country cannot afford 'pay-for-play' schemes that divide our Internet into tiers based on who has the deepest pockets," added Matsui.
However, consumer groups and advocates of net neutrality are skeptical that the legislation will go far enough to limit efforts by corporate telecom companies such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon to create a "two-tiered" Internet by offering faster service to those who can afford the fee.
The legislation does not grant the Federal Communications Commission any new regulatory powers. Rather, it directs the agency to "rely on its current authorities" to prevent Internet Service Providers (or ISPs) from providing paid prioritization for certain types of content.
Calling the bill "a step in the right direction," Timothy Karr, senior director at Free Press, told Common Dreams that the group is pleased that members of Congress are taking a stand against the "dangerous practice of prioritization."
However, Karr said that the best way to "protect real net neutrality" is for the FCC to reclassify broadband services as common carriers. Such a move would subject ISPs to greater regulation, much like a utility. "The FCC should move swiftly to do this," Karr added.
According to the senator's office, the legislation would require the FCC to "prohibit paid prioritization agreements between Internet Service Provider's (ISP) and content providers on the last mile Internet connection, the connection between the ISP and the consumer." Further, it would "prohibit broadband providers from prioritizing or otherwise giving preferential treatment to its own last mile Internet traffic or the traffic of its affiliates over the traffic of others."
The proposal comes as the FCC weighs a new plan put forth by current FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler that would grant major ISPs the ability to give preferential treatment to certain content.
The FCC is currently accepting public comment on their proposed rule.
_____________________
A new bill banning "fast lanes" on the Internet was unveiled in both the Senate and House on Tuesday.
The bill, dubbed the the Online Competition and Consumer Choice Act, was introduced by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Representative Doris Matsui (D-Calif.).
"Americans [...] want an Internet that is a platform for free expression and innovation, where the best ideas and services can reach consumers based on merit rather than based on a financial relationship with a broadband provider," said Leahy in a press statement.
"Our country cannot afford 'pay-for-play' schemes that divide our Internet into tiers based on who has the deepest pockets," added Matsui.
However, consumer groups and advocates of net neutrality are skeptical that the legislation will go far enough to limit efforts by corporate telecom companies such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon to create a "two-tiered" Internet by offering faster service to those who can afford the fee.
The legislation does not grant the Federal Communications Commission any new regulatory powers. Rather, it directs the agency to "rely on its current authorities" to prevent Internet Service Providers (or ISPs) from providing paid prioritization for certain types of content.
Calling the bill "a step in the right direction," Timothy Karr, senior director at Free Press, told Common Dreams that the group is pleased that members of Congress are taking a stand against the "dangerous practice of prioritization."
However, Karr said that the best way to "protect real net neutrality" is for the FCC to reclassify broadband services as common carriers. Such a move would subject ISPs to greater regulation, much like a utility. "The FCC should move swiftly to do this," Karr added.
According to the senator's office, the legislation would require the FCC to "prohibit paid prioritization agreements between Internet Service Provider's (ISP) and content providers on the last mile Internet connection, the connection between the ISP and the consumer." Further, it would "prohibit broadband providers from prioritizing or otherwise giving preferential treatment to its own last mile Internet traffic or the traffic of its affiliates over the traffic of others."
The proposal comes as the FCC weighs a new plan put forth by current FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler that would grant major ISPs the ability to give preferential treatment to certain content.
The FCC is currently accepting public comment on their proposed rule.
_____________________