Net Neutrality-Defender Barack Obama Missing in Action
Following much-criticized FCC proposal advanced Thursday, president who said "he would take back seat to no one' on net neutrality is nowhere to be found.
As a president who has professed to be a staunch supporter of net neutrality, Obama must voice his opposition to the proposal just advanced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a group advocating for an open Internet charges.
On Thursday, the Commission voted for a proposal that, as Michael Weinberg, Vice President at Public Knowledge, stated, "falls well short of real net neutrality rules. It would create a two-tier internet where 'commercially reasonable' discrimination is allowed on any connections that exceed an unknown 'minimum level of access' defined by the FCC."
"A two-tier internet is anathema to a truly open internet," he added.
Former FCC chairman Michael Copps, now a special adviser to advocacy group Common Cause, expressed similar disappointment, issuing a statement that "The FCC could have moved decisively to guarantee that the Internet remains an open platform for free expression and the exchange of democracy-sustaining communications."
"Instead, the Commission again left broadband users without the protections they deserve," Copps stated.
These open Internet protections are ones Obama has openly said he vowed to support. For example, in 2007 the then-senator pledged that he would make net neutrality a priority, saying he was a "strong supporter" of the principle, and that having a two-tiered Internet "destroys one of the best things about the Internet--which is that there is this incredible equality there." And in 2008, as President-elect, he said, "I will take a backseat to no one in my commitment to network neutrality."
But his emphatic support was not present following the FCC vote yesterday; rather, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney issued a statement on Thursday reading, in part:
The FCC is an independent agency, and we will carefully review their proposal. The FCC's efforts were dealt a real challenge by the Court of Appeals in January, but Chairman Wheeler has said his goal is to preserve an open Internet, and we are pleased to see that he is keeping all options on the table. We will be watching closely as the process moves forward in hopes that the final rule stays true to the spirit of net neutrality.
The President is looking at every way to protect a free and open Internet, and will consider any option that might make sense.
This statement from the White House is "clearly not enough," Timothy Karr, Senior Director of Strategy at Free Press, a group that has long-advocated for net neutrality, told Common Dreams.
It's true that the the FCC is technically an independent agency, Karr said. "However, Obama has been outspoken on numerous occasions," including comments regarding the type of discrimination his FCC Chairman Wheeler is proposing.
"If he wants to hold to his pledge to uphold an open Internet," Karr continued, "he's going to have to speak up against Wheeler's proposals."
Several open Internet-defending groups, including reddit, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Free Press, have provided tools to help users submit their comments to the FCC during the public comment period to maintain pressure on the agency to preserve net neutrality.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
As a president who has professed to be a staunch supporter of net neutrality, Obama must voice his opposition to the proposal just advanced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a group advocating for an open Internet charges.
On Thursday, the Commission voted for a proposal that, as Michael Weinberg, Vice President at Public Knowledge, stated, "falls well short of real net neutrality rules. It would create a two-tier internet where 'commercially reasonable' discrimination is allowed on any connections that exceed an unknown 'minimum level of access' defined by the FCC."
"A two-tier internet is anathema to a truly open internet," he added.
Former FCC chairman Michael Copps, now a special adviser to advocacy group Common Cause, expressed similar disappointment, issuing a statement that "The FCC could have moved decisively to guarantee that the Internet remains an open platform for free expression and the exchange of democracy-sustaining communications."
"Instead, the Commission again left broadband users without the protections they deserve," Copps stated.
These open Internet protections are ones Obama has openly said he vowed to support. For example, in 2007 the then-senator pledged that he would make net neutrality a priority, saying he was a "strong supporter" of the principle, and that having a two-tiered Internet "destroys one of the best things about the Internet--which is that there is this incredible equality there." And in 2008, as President-elect, he said, "I will take a backseat to no one in my commitment to network neutrality."
But his emphatic support was not present following the FCC vote yesterday; rather, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney issued a statement on Thursday reading, in part:
The FCC is an independent agency, and we will carefully review their proposal. The FCC's efforts were dealt a real challenge by the Court of Appeals in January, but Chairman Wheeler has said his goal is to preserve an open Internet, and we are pleased to see that he is keeping all options on the table. We will be watching closely as the process moves forward in hopes that the final rule stays true to the spirit of net neutrality.
The President is looking at every way to protect a free and open Internet, and will consider any option that might make sense.
This statement from the White House is "clearly not enough," Timothy Karr, Senior Director of Strategy at Free Press, a group that has long-advocated for net neutrality, told Common Dreams.
It's true that the the FCC is technically an independent agency, Karr said. "However, Obama has been outspoken on numerous occasions," including comments regarding the type of discrimination his FCC Chairman Wheeler is proposing.
"If he wants to hold to his pledge to uphold an open Internet," Karr continued, "he's going to have to speak up against Wheeler's proposals."
Several open Internet-defending groups, including reddit, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Free Press, have provided tools to help users submit their comments to the FCC during the public comment period to maintain pressure on the agency to preserve net neutrality.
As a president who has professed to be a staunch supporter of net neutrality, Obama must voice his opposition to the proposal just advanced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a group advocating for an open Internet charges.
On Thursday, the Commission voted for a proposal that, as Michael Weinberg, Vice President at Public Knowledge, stated, "falls well short of real net neutrality rules. It would create a two-tier internet where 'commercially reasonable' discrimination is allowed on any connections that exceed an unknown 'minimum level of access' defined by the FCC."
"A two-tier internet is anathema to a truly open internet," he added.
Former FCC chairman Michael Copps, now a special adviser to advocacy group Common Cause, expressed similar disappointment, issuing a statement that "The FCC could have moved decisively to guarantee that the Internet remains an open platform for free expression and the exchange of democracy-sustaining communications."
"Instead, the Commission again left broadband users without the protections they deserve," Copps stated.
These open Internet protections are ones Obama has openly said he vowed to support. For example, in 2007 the then-senator pledged that he would make net neutrality a priority, saying he was a "strong supporter" of the principle, and that having a two-tiered Internet "destroys one of the best things about the Internet--which is that there is this incredible equality there." And in 2008, as President-elect, he said, "I will take a backseat to no one in my commitment to network neutrality."
But his emphatic support was not present following the FCC vote yesterday; rather, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney issued a statement on Thursday reading, in part:
The FCC is an independent agency, and we will carefully review their proposal. The FCC's efforts were dealt a real challenge by the Court of Appeals in January, but Chairman Wheeler has said his goal is to preserve an open Internet, and we are pleased to see that he is keeping all options on the table. We will be watching closely as the process moves forward in hopes that the final rule stays true to the spirit of net neutrality.
The President is looking at every way to protect a free and open Internet, and will consider any option that might make sense.
This statement from the White House is "clearly not enough," Timothy Karr, Senior Director of Strategy at Free Press, a group that has long-advocated for net neutrality, told Common Dreams.
It's true that the the FCC is technically an independent agency, Karr said. "However, Obama has been outspoken on numerous occasions," including comments regarding the type of discrimination his FCC Chairman Wheeler is proposing.
"If he wants to hold to his pledge to uphold an open Internet," Karr continued, "he's going to have to speak up against Wheeler's proposals."
Several open Internet-defending groups, including reddit, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Free Press, have provided tools to help users submit their comments to the FCC during the public comment period to maintain pressure on the agency to preserve net neutrality.