SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Net Neutrality-Defender Barack Obama Missing in Action
Following much-criticized FCC proposal advanced Thursday, president who said "he would take back seat to no one' on net neutrality is nowhere to be found.
May 16, 2014
As a president who has professed to be a staunch supporter of net neutrality, Obama must voice his opposition to the proposal just advanced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a group advocating for an open Internet charges.
On Thursday, the Commission voted for a proposal that, as Michael Weinberg, Vice President at Public Knowledge, stated, "falls well short of real net neutrality rules. It would create a two-tier internet where 'commercially reasonable' discrimination is allowed on any connections that exceed an unknown 'minimum level of access' defined by the FCC."
"A two-tier internet is anathema to a truly open internet," he added.
Former FCC chairman Michael Copps, now a special adviser to advocacy group Common Cause, expressed similar disappointment, issuing a statement that "The FCC could have moved decisively to guarantee that the Internet remains an open platform for free expression and the exchange of democracy-sustaining communications."
"Instead, the Commission again left broadband users without the protections they deserve," Copps stated.
These open Internet protections are ones Obama has openly said he vowed to support. For example, in 2007 the then-senator pledged that he would make net neutrality a priority, saying he was a "strong supporter" of the principle, and that having a two-tiered Internet "destroys one of the best things about the Internet--which is that there is this incredible equality there." And in 2008, as President-elect, he said, "I will take a backseat to no one in my commitment to network neutrality."
But his emphatic support was not present following the FCC vote yesterday; rather, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney issued a statement on Thursday reading, in part:
The FCC is an independent agency, and we will carefully review their proposal. The FCC's efforts were dealt a real challenge by the Court of Appeals in January, but Chairman Wheeler has said his goal is to preserve an open Internet, and we are pleased to see that he is keeping all options on the table. We will be watching closely as the process moves forward in hopes that the final rule stays true to the spirit of net neutrality.
The President is looking at every way to protect a free and open Internet, and will consider any option that might make sense.
This statement from the White House is "clearly not enough," Timothy Karr, Senior Director of Strategy at Free Press, a group that has long-advocated for net neutrality, told Common Dreams.
It's true that the the FCC is technically an independent agency, Karr said. "However, Obama has been outspoken on numerous occasions," including comments regarding the type of discrimination his FCC Chairman Wheeler is proposing.
"If he wants to hold to his pledge to uphold an open Internet," Karr continued, "he's going to have to speak up against Wheeler's proposals."
Several open Internet-defending groups, including reddit, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Free Press, have provided tools to help users submit their comments to the FCC during the public comment period to maintain pressure on the agency to preserve net neutrality.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As a president who has professed to be a staunch supporter of net neutrality, Obama must voice his opposition to the proposal just advanced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a group advocating for an open Internet charges.
On Thursday, the Commission voted for a proposal that, as Michael Weinberg, Vice President at Public Knowledge, stated, "falls well short of real net neutrality rules. It would create a two-tier internet where 'commercially reasonable' discrimination is allowed on any connections that exceed an unknown 'minimum level of access' defined by the FCC."
"A two-tier internet is anathema to a truly open internet," he added.
Former FCC chairman Michael Copps, now a special adviser to advocacy group Common Cause, expressed similar disappointment, issuing a statement that "The FCC could have moved decisively to guarantee that the Internet remains an open platform for free expression and the exchange of democracy-sustaining communications."
"Instead, the Commission again left broadband users without the protections they deserve," Copps stated.
These open Internet protections are ones Obama has openly said he vowed to support. For example, in 2007 the then-senator pledged that he would make net neutrality a priority, saying he was a "strong supporter" of the principle, and that having a two-tiered Internet "destroys one of the best things about the Internet--which is that there is this incredible equality there." And in 2008, as President-elect, he said, "I will take a backseat to no one in my commitment to network neutrality."
But his emphatic support was not present following the FCC vote yesterday; rather, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney issued a statement on Thursday reading, in part:
The FCC is an independent agency, and we will carefully review their proposal. The FCC's efforts were dealt a real challenge by the Court of Appeals in January, but Chairman Wheeler has said his goal is to preserve an open Internet, and we are pleased to see that he is keeping all options on the table. We will be watching closely as the process moves forward in hopes that the final rule stays true to the spirit of net neutrality.
The President is looking at every way to protect a free and open Internet, and will consider any option that might make sense.
This statement from the White House is "clearly not enough," Timothy Karr, Senior Director of Strategy at Free Press, a group that has long-advocated for net neutrality, told Common Dreams.
It's true that the the FCC is technically an independent agency, Karr said. "However, Obama has been outspoken on numerous occasions," including comments regarding the type of discrimination his FCC Chairman Wheeler is proposing.
"If he wants to hold to his pledge to uphold an open Internet," Karr continued, "he's going to have to speak up against Wheeler's proposals."
Several open Internet-defending groups, including reddit, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Free Press, have provided tools to help users submit their comments to the FCC during the public comment period to maintain pressure on the agency to preserve net neutrality.
As a president who has professed to be a staunch supporter of net neutrality, Obama must voice his opposition to the proposal just advanced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a group advocating for an open Internet charges.
On Thursday, the Commission voted for a proposal that, as Michael Weinberg, Vice President at Public Knowledge, stated, "falls well short of real net neutrality rules. It would create a two-tier internet where 'commercially reasonable' discrimination is allowed on any connections that exceed an unknown 'minimum level of access' defined by the FCC."
"A two-tier internet is anathema to a truly open internet," he added.
Former FCC chairman Michael Copps, now a special adviser to advocacy group Common Cause, expressed similar disappointment, issuing a statement that "The FCC could have moved decisively to guarantee that the Internet remains an open platform for free expression and the exchange of democracy-sustaining communications."
"Instead, the Commission again left broadband users without the protections they deserve," Copps stated.
These open Internet protections are ones Obama has openly said he vowed to support. For example, in 2007 the then-senator pledged that he would make net neutrality a priority, saying he was a "strong supporter" of the principle, and that having a two-tiered Internet "destroys one of the best things about the Internet--which is that there is this incredible equality there." And in 2008, as President-elect, he said, "I will take a backseat to no one in my commitment to network neutrality."
But his emphatic support was not present following the FCC vote yesterday; rather, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney issued a statement on Thursday reading, in part:
The FCC is an independent agency, and we will carefully review their proposal. The FCC's efforts were dealt a real challenge by the Court of Appeals in January, but Chairman Wheeler has said his goal is to preserve an open Internet, and we are pleased to see that he is keeping all options on the table. We will be watching closely as the process moves forward in hopes that the final rule stays true to the spirit of net neutrality.
The President is looking at every way to protect a free and open Internet, and will consider any option that might make sense.
This statement from the White House is "clearly not enough," Timothy Karr, Senior Director of Strategy at Free Press, a group that has long-advocated for net neutrality, told Common Dreams.
It's true that the the FCC is technically an independent agency, Karr said. "However, Obama has been outspoken on numerous occasions," including comments regarding the type of discrimination his FCC Chairman Wheeler is proposing.
"If he wants to hold to his pledge to uphold an open Internet," Karr continued, "he's going to have to speak up against Wheeler's proposals."
Several open Internet-defending groups, including reddit, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Free Press, have provided tools to help users submit their comments to the FCC during the public comment period to maintain pressure on the agency to preserve net neutrality.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.