Feb 04, 2014
Called "Kelp Watch 2014," the campaign led by researchers from California State University, Long Beach (CSULB) and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory will analyze how ocean currents might have carried over Fukushima radioactivity to California's kelp forest, which the researchers describe as "a highly productive and complex ecosystem and a valuable state resource."
"What I have attempted to do is to organize marine scientists and educators from up and down the coastline to collect a large amount of kelp several times a year so that we can ascertain the amount of radioactive material entering our kelp forests," explained CSULB Biology Professor Steven L. Manley, one of the two scientists that initiated the project, in a statement.
"We have two main objectives," added Kai Vetter, Berkeley Lab's Head of Applied Nuclear Physics, who initiated the project with Manley. "To learn more about the distribution and transport of these materials in our world, and to make the results and explanations available to the public."
"The best result would be that we don't see any [radioactivity]," U-T San Diego reports Manley as saying. "But if it gets into the kelp forest ecosystem, I want to know how much is there and whether it has an affect on marine life. This is one of the most important types of ecosystems on Earth."
Manley has previously studied Fukushima radioactivity on kelp in California. He and another colleague from CSULB analyzed samples from seven spots along the state's coast just after the March 2011 accident and found higher than normal levels of levels of Iodine 131, a radioisotope that dissipates quickly and that Manley said did not present a threat to human health.
_________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Called "Kelp Watch 2014," the campaign led by researchers from California State University, Long Beach (CSULB) and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory will analyze how ocean currents might have carried over Fukushima radioactivity to California's kelp forest, which the researchers describe as "a highly productive and complex ecosystem and a valuable state resource."
"What I have attempted to do is to organize marine scientists and educators from up and down the coastline to collect a large amount of kelp several times a year so that we can ascertain the amount of radioactive material entering our kelp forests," explained CSULB Biology Professor Steven L. Manley, one of the two scientists that initiated the project, in a statement.
"We have two main objectives," added Kai Vetter, Berkeley Lab's Head of Applied Nuclear Physics, who initiated the project with Manley. "To learn more about the distribution and transport of these materials in our world, and to make the results and explanations available to the public."
"The best result would be that we don't see any [radioactivity]," U-T San Diego reports Manley as saying. "But if it gets into the kelp forest ecosystem, I want to know how much is there and whether it has an affect on marine life. This is one of the most important types of ecosystems on Earth."
Manley has previously studied Fukushima radioactivity on kelp in California. He and another colleague from CSULB analyzed samples from seven spots along the state's coast just after the March 2011 accident and found higher than normal levels of levels of Iodine 131, a radioisotope that dissipates quickly and that Manley said did not present a threat to human health.
_________________
Called "Kelp Watch 2014," the campaign led by researchers from California State University, Long Beach (CSULB) and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory will analyze how ocean currents might have carried over Fukushima radioactivity to California's kelp forest, which the researchers describe as "a highly productive and complex ecosystem and a valuable state resource."
"What I have attempted to do is to organize marine scientists and educators from up and down the coastline to collect a large amount of kelp several times a year so that we can ascertain the amount of radioactive material entering our kelp forests," explained CSULB Biology Professor Steven L. Manley, one of the two scientists that initiated the project, in a statement.
"We have two main objectives," added Kai Vetter, Berkeley Lab's Head of Applied Nuclear Physics, who initiated the project with Manley. "To learn more about the distribution and transport of these materials in our world, and to make the results and explanations available to the public."
"The best result would be that we don't see any [radioactivity]," U-T San Diego reports Manley as saying. "But if it gets into the kelp forest ecosystem, I want to know how much is there and whether it has an affect on marine life. This is one of the most important types of ecosystems on Earth."
Manley has previously studied Fukushima radioactivity on kelp in California. He and another colleague from CSULB analyzed samples from seven spots along the state's coast just after the March 2011 accident and found higher than normal levels of levels of Iodine 131, a radioisotope that dissipates quickly and that Manley said did not present a threat to human health.
_________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.