Assange Loses Appeal Against Extradition
London court rules WikiLeaks founder should be sent to Sweden to face questioning over sexual assault allegations.
A UK court has ruled that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange should be extradited to Sweden for questioning over alleged sexual crimes.
In a judgement on Wednesday, Judges John Thomas and Duncan Ousely said that Assange, who was in court to hear the verdict, should be sent to Sweden to be questioned over the alleged rape of one woman and the molestation of another in Stockholm last year.
Swedish authorities want to quiz the 40-year-old over accusations of rape and sexual assault made by two former female volunteers for his WikiLeaks organisation.
In their ruling, the judges said the decision by Swedish authorities to issue a European Arrest Warrant could not "be said to be disproportionate".
"In any event, this is self evidently not a case relating to a trivial offence, but to serious sexual offences", the judges said.
Before the judgement, extradition lawyer Julian Knowles had said Assange would only be able to appeal to Britain's supreme court, the country's highest, if his appeal involved an issue of "real legal significance", as decided by an appeals court.
Knowles said that if Assange is permitted a further appeal, he would likely stay on bail for a couple of months. If not, "he'll be extradited within 10 days", he predicted.
Assange had claimed in his appeal that the alleged offenses would not have been regarded as crimes under English and Welsh law, a stance the judges rejected.
"There can be no doubt that if what Mr Assange had done had been done in England and Wales, he would have been charged," the ruling said.
Shadow over WikiLeaks
The case has cast a shadow over Assange and his whistle-blowing website which published a cache of more than 250,000 secret US diplomatic cables last year and caused a media sensation.
A British judge approved the Swedish request for the computer expert's extradition in February, but Assange appealed against that decision.
His lawyers have argued the Swedish demand is legally flawed and that the sex was consensual.
Assange, who is free under strict bail conditions, has also accused the United States of putting pressure on Britain, Sweden and the media.
Last month, Assange, an Australian citizen, said WikiLeaks would stop publishing secret cables and devote itself instead to fund raising because of a financial blockade on payments to the site by US firms such as Visa and MasterCard.
He said if the blockade was not ended by the turn of the year, WikiLeaks would not be able to continue.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A UK court has ruled that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange should be extradited to Sweden for questioning over alleged sexual crimes.
In a judgement on Wednesday, Judges John Thomas and Duncan Ousely said that Assange, who was in court to hear the verdict, should be sent to Sweden to be questioned over the alleged rape of one woman and the molestation of another in Stockholm last year.
Swedish authorities want to quiz the 40-year-old over accusations of rape and sexual assault made by two former female volunteers for his WikiLeaks organisation.
In their ruling, the judges said the decision by Swedish authorities to issue a European Arrest Warrant could not "be said to be disproportionate".
"In any event, this is self evidently not a case relating to a trivial offence, but to serious sexual offences", the judges said.
Before the judgement, extradition lawyer Julian Knowles had said Assange would only be able to appeal to Britain's supreme court, the country's highest, if his appeal involved an issue of "real legal significance", as decided by an appeals court.
Knowles said that if Assange is permitted a further appeal, he would likely stay on bail for a couple of months. If not, "he'll be extradited within 10 days", he predicted.
Assange had claimed in his appeal that the alleged offenses would not have been regarded as crimes under English and Welsh law, a stance the judges rejected.
"There can be no doubt that if what Mr Assange had done had been done in England and Wales, he would have been charged," the ruling said.
Shadow over WikiLeaks
The case has cast a shadow over Assange and his whistle-blowing website which published a cache of more than 250,000 secret US diplomatic cables last year and caused a media sensation.
A British judge approved the Swedish request for the computer expert's extradition in February, but Assange appealed against that decision.
His lawyers have argued the Swedish demand is legally flawed and that the sex was consensual.
Assange, who is free under strict bail conditions, has also accused the United States of putting pressure on Britain, Sweden and the media.
Last month, Assange, an Australian citizen, said WikiLeaks would stop publishing secret cables and devote itself instead to fund raising because of a financial blockade on payments to the site by US firms such as Visa and MasterCard.
He said if the blockade was not ended by the turn of the year, WikiLeaks would not be able to continue.
A UK court has ruled that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange should be extradited to Sweden for questioning over alleged sexual crimes.
In a judgement on Wednesday, Judges John Thomas and Duncan Ousely said that Assange, who was in court to hear the verdict, should be sent to Sweden to be questioned over the alleged rape of one woman and the molestation of another in Stockholm last year.
Swedish authorities want to quiz the 40-year-old over accusations of rape and sexual assault made by two former female volunteers for his WikiLeaks organisation.
In their ruling, the judges said the decision by Swedish authorities to issue a European Arrest Warrant could not "be said to be disproportionate".
"In any event, this is self evidently not a case relating to a trivial offence, but to serious sexual offences", the judges said.
Before the judgement, extradition lawyer Julian Knowles had said Assange would only be able to appeal to Britain's supreme court, the country's highest, if his appeal involved an issue of "real legal significance", as decided by an appeals court.
Knowles said that if Assange is permitted a further appeal, he would likely stay on bail for a couple of months. If not, "he'll be extradited within 10 days", he predicted.
Assange had claimed in his appeal that the alleged offenses would not have been regarded as crimes under English and Welsh law, a stance the judges rejected.
"There can be no doubt that if what Mr Assange had done had been done in England and Wales, he would have been charged," the ruling said.
Shadow over WikiLeaks
The case has cast a shadow over Assange and his whistle-blowing website which published a cache of more than 250,000 secret US diplomatic cables last year and caused a media sensation.
A British judge approved the Swedish request for the computer expert's extradition in February, but Assange appealed against that decision.
His lawyers have argued the Swedish demand is legally flawed and that the sex was consensual.
Assange, who is free under strict bail conditions, has also accused the United States of putting pressure on Britain, Sweden and the media.
Last month, Assange, an Australian citizen, said WikiLeaks would stop publishing secret cables and devote itself instead to fund raising because of a financial blockade on payments to the site by US firms such as Visa and MasterCard.
He said if the blockade was not ended by the turn of the year, WikiLeaks would not be able to continue.