SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
UN Set to Vote on Iran Sanctions
Jun 09, 2010
The
United Nations Security Council has agreed on a final package of
economic sanctions against Iran, paving the way for a vote as early as
Wednesday, diplomats say.
Tuesday's announcement came after countries reached an agreement on
a list of companies and individuals subject to a travel ban and an
asset freeze.
The
draft resolution - the fourth mandating sanctions against Iran - is
sponsored by the five permanent members of the Security Council: the
US, Britain, France, China and Russia.
In addition to the blacklist, it expands an existing arms embargo
against Iran, and prevents the country from importing technology for
certain kinds of ballistic missiles.
Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, called the proposed sanctions the "most significant" ever against Iran.
"I think it is fair [to say] that these are the most significant
sanctions that Iran has ever faced," she said. "The amount of unity
that has been engendered by the international community is very
significant."
'Stick of resolution'
The Security Council announcement came several hours after Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, warned that any new sanctions would
end the prospect of negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme.
"The US government and its allies are so mistaken that if they think
they can brandish the stick of resolution and then sit down to talk
with us, such a thing will not happen," he said.
"We will talk to everyone if there is respect and fairness but if
someone wants to talk to us rudely and in a domineering manner the
response is known already."
Ahmadinejad also gave warning that a nuclear fuel swap deal reached last month - negotiated by Turkey and Brazil - could be scrapped if the UN approves new sanctions.
Under the proposed deal, Iran would ship 1200 kilograms of enriched
uranium to Turkey in return for nuclear fuel for a reactor in Tehran.
The US and its allies have been indifferent to the proposal, saying it was not a serious offer.
The Iranian president had hoped that his warning, made at a regional
security summit in Turkey, would sow seeds of doubt in the minds of
Russian and Chinese leaders. Both are veto-wielding members of the
council, and they have ensured that previous drafts of the resolution
were watered down.
Alireza Ronaghi, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Tehran, said the
sanctions under discussion at the UN would not have a drastic effect on
the Iranian economy.
"It's important to remember that the Iranian economy has been under
sanction for 30 years now," he said. "None of the sanctions are going
to choke the Iranian economy."
'Window of opportunity'
Jorio Dauster, a former Brazilian ambassador to the European Union,
told Al Jazeera that the new round of sanctions will be
"counterproductive" for three main reasons.
"First of all, they [sanctions] will probably close the very narrow
window of opportunity for negotiations that Brazil and
Turkey called for a few weeks ago," he said.
"Secondly, I believe that those sanctions are going to increase the
domestic support in Iran for Ahmadinejad and the Revolutionary Guard
since they will be able to show that the major powers have once again
treated Iran badly.
"And, finally, although the sanctions will impose an economic cost
on Iran and some difficulties for the Revolutionary Guard, they will
not in many ways impede the development of nuclear power."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The
United Nations Security Council has agreed on a final package of
economic sanctions against Iran, paving the way for a vote as early as
Wednesday, diplomats say.
Tuesday's announcement came after countries reached an agreement on
a list of companies and individuals subject to a travel ban and an
asset freeze.
The
draft resolution - the fourth mandating sanctions against Iran - is
sponsored by the five permanent members of the Security Council: the
US, Britain, France, China and Russia.
In addition to the blacklist, it expands an existing arms embargo
against Iran, and prevents the country from importing technology for
certain kinds of ballistic missiles.
Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, called the proposed sanctions the "most significant" ever against Iran.
"I think it is fair [to say] that these are the most significant
sanctions that Iran has ever faced," she said. "The amount of unity
that has been engendered by the international community is very
significant."
'Stick of resolution'
The Security Council announcement came several hours after Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, warned that any new sanctions would
end the prospect of negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme.
"The US government and its allies are so mistaken that if they think
they can brandish the stick of resolution and then sit down to talk
with us, such a thing will not happen," he said.
"We will talk to everyone if there is respect and fairness but if
someone wants to talk to us rudely and in a domineering manner the
response is known already."
Ahmadinejad also gave warning that a nuclear fuel swap deal reached last month - negotiated by Turkey and Brazil - could be scrapped if the UN approves new sanctions.
Under the proposed deal, Iran would ship 1200 kilograms of enriched
uranium to Turkey in return for nuclear fuel for a reactor in Tehran.
The US and its allies have been indifferent to the proposal, saying it was not a serious offer.
The Iranian president had hoped that his warning, made at a regional
security summit in Turkey, would sow seeds of doubt in the minds of
Russian and Chinese leaders. Both are veto-wielding members of the
council, and they have ensured that previous drafts of the resolution
were watered down.
Alireza Ronaghi, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Tehran, said the
sanctions under discussion at the UN would not have a drastic effect on
the Iranian economy.
"It's important to remember that the Iranian economy has been under
sanction for 30 years now," he said. "None of the sanctions are going
to choke the Iranian economy."
'Window of opportunity'
Jorio Dauster, a former Brazilian ambassador to the European Union,
told Al Jazeera that the new round of sanctions will be
"counterproductive" for three main reasons.
"First of all, they [sanctions] will probably close the very narrow
window of opportunity for negotiations that Brazil and
Turkey called for a few weeks ago," he said.
"Secondly, I believe that those sanctions are going to increase the
domestic support in Iran for Ahmadinejad and the Revolutionary Guard
since they will be able to show that the major powers have once again
treated Iran badly.
"And, finally, although the sanctions will impose an economic cost
on Iran and some difficulties for the Revolutionary Guard, they will
not in many ways impede the development of nuclear power."
The
United Nations Security Council has agreed on a final package of
economic sanctions against Iran, paving the way for a vote as early as
Wednesday, diplomats say.
Tuesday's announcement came after countries reached an agreement on
a list of companies and individuals subject to a travel ban and an
asset freeze.
The
draft resolution - the fourth mandating sanctions against Iran - is
sponsored by the five permanent members of the Security Council: the
US, Britain, France, China and Russia.
In addition to the blacklist, it expands an existing arms embargo
against Iran, and prevents the country from importing technology for
certain kinds of ballistic missiles.
Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, called the proposed sanctions the "most significant" ever against Iran.
"I think it is fair [to say] that these are the most significant
sanctions that Iran has ever faced," she said. "The amount of unity
that has been engendered by the international community is very
significant."
'Stick of resolution'
The Security Council announcement came several hours after Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, warned that any new sanctions would
end the prospect of negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme.
"The US government and its allies are so mistaken that if they think
they can brandish the stick of resolution and then sit down to talk
with us, such a thing will not happen," he said.
"We will talk to everyone if there is respect and fairness but if
someone wants to talk to us rudely and in a domineering manner the
response is known already."
Ahmadinejad also gave warning that a nuclear fuel swap deal reached last month - negotiated by Turkey and Brazil - could be scrapped if the UN approves new sanctions.
Under the proposed deal, Iran would ship 1200 kilograms of enriched
uranium to Turkey in return for nuclear fuel for a reactor in Tehran.
The US and its allies have been indifferent to the proposal, saying it was not a serious offer.
The Iranian president had hoped that his warning, made at a regional
security summit in Turkey, would sow seeds of doubt in the minds of
Russian and Chinese leaders. Both are veto-wielding members of the
council, and they have ensured that previous drafts of the resolution
were watered down.
Alireza Ronaghi, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Tehran, said the
sanctions under discussion at the UN would not have a drastic effect on
the Iranian economy.
"It's important to remember that the Iranian economy has been under
sanction for 30 years now," he said. "None of the sanctions are going
to choke the Iranian economy."
'Window of opportunity'
Jorio Dauster, a former Brazilian ambassador to the European Union,
told Al Jazeera that the new round of sanctions will be
"counterproductive" for three main reasons.
"First of all, they [sanctions] will probably close the very narrow
window of opportunity for negotiations that Brazil and
Turkey called for a few weeks ago," he said.
"Secondly, I believe that those sanctions are going to increase the
domestic support in Iran for Ahmadinejad and the Revolutionary Guard
since they will be able to show that the major powers have once again
treated Iran badly.
"And, finally, although the sanctions will impose an economic cost
on Iran and some difficulties for the Revolutionary Guard, they will
not in many ways impede the development of nuclear power."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.