SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In a series of initiatives, Canadian provincial governments and aboriginal leaders have set aside vast tracts of coniferous woods, wetlands, and peat. The conservation drive bans logging, mining, and oil drilling on some 250m acres - an area more than twice the size of California.
In the far north latitudes, buried within a seemingly endless expanse of evergreen forests, the authorities in Canada are building up one of the world's best natural defences against global warming.
In
a series of initiatives, Canadian provincial governments and aboriginal
leaders have set aside vast tracts of coniferous woods, wetlands, and
peat. The conservation drive bans logging, mining, and oil drilling on some 250m acres - an area more than twice the size of California.
The
sheer scale of the forest conservation drive is somewhat of an anomaly
for Canada, whose government has been accused of sabotaging the global climate change talks by its development of the Alberta tar sands and its refusal to make deep cuts in its greenhouse gas emissions.
Last
week, a former adviser to Barack Obama urged Canada to do more to keep
up with America's moves towards a cleaner energy economy.
In the
latest addition to the carbon storehouse, the provincial premier of
Manitoba, Gary Doer, this month announced a $10m (PS5.6m) Canadian fund
to protect a 10.8m acre expanse of boreal or evergreen forest. It was
one of Doer's last acts as premier; he took over as Canada's ambassador
to Washington this month.
The $10m will go towards efforts by
indigenous leaders to designate boreal forest lands in eastern Manitoba
as a Unesco world heritage site. The Pimachiowin Aki world heritage project,
which straddles the Manitoba-Ontario border, extends efforts by
Canadian provincial leaders to protect the wide swaths of pristine
forests in the north. It also ensures the survival of one of the best
natural defences against global warming after the world's oceans,
environmentalists say.
A report by the International Boreal Conservation Campaign
said the forests, with their rich mix of trees, wetlands, peat and
tundra, were a far bigger carbon store than scientists had realised,
soaking up 22% of the total carbon stored on the earth's land surface.
"If
you look across Canada one of [the boreal forest's] great values to us
globally is its carbon storage value," said Steve Kallick, director of
the Pew Environment Group's International Boreal Conservation Campaign.
"There is so much carbon sequestered in it already that if it escaped
it would pose a whole new, very grave threat."
Canada's cold
temperatures slow decomposition, allowing the build-up of organic soil
and peat. The forest floors beneath its evergreens hold twice as much
carbon per acre as tropical forests, such as the Amazon.
It is
unclear how long Canada's forests can continue to serve as carbon
vaults. "As the climate warms, the place is going to dry up. There will
be a problem with insect infestation. There is going to be increased
natural carbon release due to fire or wetlands drying up," said Sue
Libenson, a spokeswoman for the International Boreal Conservation
Campaign.
But she added: "The general premise is that there is
still a hell of a lot of carbon in there." Its release would be a
climate catastrophe.
Canada's 1.3bn acres of boreal forest store the equivalent of 27 years' worth of current global greenhouse gas emissions, a Greenpeace study
found. The destruction of those forests, scientists warn, would be like
setting off a massive "carbon bomb" because of the sudden release of
emissions.
That threat appears to have concentrated the official
mindset in Canada, which otherwise has a poor record on action on
climate change. On a per capita basis, the country is one of the worst polluters on the planet, producing about 2% of the world's emissions even though it has just 33m people. It holds one of the worst track records
among industrialised states for living up to its commitment under the
Kyoto accords. By 2007, greenhouse gas emissions were 34% above the
target Canada agreed at Kyoto.
Canada's prime minister, Stephen
Harper, is resisting doing much more, committing to just a 6% cut over
1990 levels of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. "I see Harper's policy
as a continuation of the Bush agenda," said David Martin, climate
director for Greenpeace Canada.
A
key advisor to Obama made a similar point last week, comparing Canada's
current climate change policy to the inaction in America under George
Bush. "The Canadians would be well served by keeping up with what's
going on in the United States with respect to this push towards clean
technology," John Podesta, who oversaw Obama's transition team, told a
conference in Ottawa.
Environmentalists also fear that Harper
intends to exclude the Alberta tar sands - the heavy crude deposits
that have fuelled the rise in emissions - from any future greenhouse
gas emissions regime.
But the Harper government did relent on
forest protection, working with the Sahtu and Deh Cho First Nations to
set aside 40m acres in the Northwest Territories.
Canadian
provincial leaders have moved even more aggressively in recent years,
with Ontario committed to protecting 55m acres, or about half of its
forest, and Quebec committed to protecting 150m acres. "Canada is torn
between wanting to promote the tar sands and make money off it now, and
wanting to live up to its promises under the Kyoto accord. But as far
as protecting carbon rich ecosystems, particularly the boreal forest,
Canada is a world leader," said Kallick.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In the far north latitudes, buried within a seemingly endless expanse of evergreen forests, the authorities in Canada are building up one of the world's best natural defences against global warming.
In
a series of initiatives, Canadian provincial governments and aboriginal
leaders have set aside vast tracts of coniferous woods, wetlands, and
peat. The conservation drive bans logging, mining, and oil drilling on some 250m acres - an area more than twice the size of California.
The
sheer scale of the forest conservation drive is somewhat of an anomaly
for Canada, whose government has been accused of sabotaging the global climate change talks by its development of the Alberta tar sands and its refusal to make deep cuts in its greenhouse gas emissions.
Last
week, a former adviser to Barack Obama urged Canada to do more to keep
up with America's moves towards a cleaner energy economy.
In the
latest addition to the carbon storehouse, the provincial premier of
Manitoba, Gary Doer, this month announced a $10m (PS5.6m) Canadian fund
to protect a 10.8m acre expanse of boreal or evergreen forest. It was
one of Doer's last acts as premier; he took over as Canada's ambassador
to Washington this month.
The $10m will go towards efforts by
indigenous leaders to designate boreal forest lands in eastern Manitoba
as a Unesco world heritage site. The Pimachiowin Aki world heritage project,
which straddles the Manitoba-Ontario border, extends efforts by
Canadian provincial leaders to protect the wide swaths of pristine
forests in the north. It also ensures the survival of one of the best
natural defences against global warming after the world's oceans,
environmentalists say.
A report by the International Boreal Conservation Campaign
said the forests, with their rich mix of trees, wetlands, peat and
tundra, were a far bigger carbon store than scientists had realised,
soaking up 22% of the total carbon stored on the earth's land surface.
"If
you look across Canada one of [the boreal forest's] great values to us
globally is its carbon storage value," said Steve Kallick, director of
the Pew Environment Group's International Boreal Conservation Campaign.
"There is so much carbon sequestered in it already that if it escaped
it would pose a whole new, very grave threat."
Canada's cold
temperatures slow decomposition, allowing the build-up of organic soil
and peat. The forest floors beneath its evergreens hold twice as much
carbon per acre as tropical forests, such as the Amazon.
It is
unclear how long Canada's forests can continue to serve as carbon
vaults. "As the climate warms, the place is going to dry up. There will
be a problem with insect infestation. There is going to be increased
natural carbon release due to fire or wetlands drying up," said Sue
Libenson, a spokeswoman for the International Boreal Conservation
Campaign.
But she added: "The general premise is that there is
still a hell of a lot of carbon in there." Its release would be a
climate catastrophe.
Canada's 1.3bn acres of boreal forest store the equivalent of 27 years' worth of current global greenhouse gas emissions, a Greenpeace study
found. The destruction of those forests, scientists warn, would be like
setting off a massive "carbon bomb" because of the sudden release of
emissions.
That threat appears to have concentrated the official
mindset in Canada, which otherwise has a poor record on action on
climate change. On a per capita basis, the country is one of the worst polluters on the planet, producing about 2% of the world's emissions even though it has just 33m people. It holds one of the worst track records
among industrialised states for living up to its commitment under the
Kyoto accords. By 2007, greenhouse gas emissions were 34% above the
target Canada agreed at Kyoto.
Canada's prime minister, Stephen
Harper, is resisting doing much more, committing to just a 6% cut over
1990 levels of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. "I see Harper's policy
as a continuation of the Bush agenda," said David Martin, climate
director for Greenpeace Canada.
A
key advisor to Obama made a similar point last week, comparing Canada's
current climate change policy to the inaction in America under George
Bush. "The Canadians would be well served by keeping up with what's
going on in the United States with respect to this push towards clean
technology," John Podesta, who oversaw Obama's transition team, told a
conference in Ottawa.
Environmentalists also fear that Harper
intends to exclude the Alberta tar sands - the heavy crude deposits
that have fuelled the rise in emissions - from any future greenhouse
gas emissions regime.
But the Harper government did relent on
forest protection, working with the Sahtu and Deh Cho First Nations to
set aside 40m acres in the Northwest Territories.
Canadian
provincial leaders have moved even more aggressively in recent years,
with Ontario committed to protecting 55m acres, or about half of its
forest, and Quebec committed to protecting 150m acres. "Canada is torn
between wanting to promote the tar sands and make money off it now, and
wanting to live up to its promises under the Kyoto accord. But as far
as protecting carbon rich ecosystems, particularly the boreal forest,
Canada is a world leader," said Kallick.
In the far north latitudes, buried within a seemingly endless expanse of evergreen forests, the authorities in Canada are building up one of the world's best natural defences against global warming.
In
a series of initiatives, Canadian provincial governments and aboriginal
leaders have set aside vast tracts of coniferous woods, wetlands, and
peat. The conservation drive bans logging, mining, and oil drilling on some 250m acres - an area more than twice the size of California.
The
sheer scale of the forest conservation drive is somewhat of an anomaly
for Canada, whose government has been accused of sabotaging the global climate change talks by its development of the Alberta tar sands and its refusal to make deep cuts in its greenhouse gas emissions.
Last
week, a former adviser to Barack Obama urged Canada to do more to keep
up with America's moves towards a cleaner energy economy.
In the
latest addition to the carbon storehouse, the provincial premier of
Manitoba, Gary Doer, this month announced a $10m (PS5.6m) Canadian fund
to protect a 10.8m acre expanse of boreal or evergreen forest. It was
one of Doer's last acts as premier; he took over as Canada's ambassador
to Washington this month.
The $10m will go towards efforts by
indigenous leaders to designate boreal forest lands in eastern Manitoba
as a Unesco world heritage site. The Pimachiowin Aki world heritage project,
which straddles the Manitoba-Ontario border, extends efforts by
Canadian provincial leaders to protect the wide swaths of pristine
forests in the north. It also ensures the survival of one of the best
natural defences against global warming after the world's oceans,
environmentalists say.
A report by the International Boreal Conservation Campaign
said the forests, with their rich mix of trees, wetlands, peat and
tundra, were a far bigger carbon store than scientists had realised,
soaking up 22% of the total carbon stored on the earth's land surface.
"If
you look across Canada one of [the boreal forest's] great values to us
globally is its carbon storage value," said Steve Kallick, director of
the Pew Environment Group's International Boreal Conservation Campaign.
"There is so much carbon sequestered in it already that if it escaped
it would pose a whole new, very grave threat."
Canada's cold
temperatures slow decomposition, allowing the build-up of organic soil
and peat. The forest floors beneath its evergreens hold twice as much
carbon per acre as tropical forests, such as the Amazon.
It is
unclear how long Canada's forests can continue to serve as carbon
vaults. "As the climate warms, the place is going to dry up. There will
be a problem with insect infestation. There is going to be increased
natural carbon release due to fire or wetlands drying up," said Sue
Libenson, a spokeswoman for the International Boreal Conservation
Campaign.
But she added: "The general premise is that there is
still a hell of a lot of carbon in there." Its release would be a
climate catastrophe.
Canada's 1.3bn acres of boreal forest store the equivalent of 27 years' worth of current global greenhouse gas emissions, a Greenpeace study
found. The destruction of those forests, scientists warn, would be like
setting off a massive "carbon bomb" because of the sudden release of
emissions.
That threat appears to have concentrated the official
mindset in Canada, which otherwise has a poor record on action on
climate change. On a per capita basis, the country is one of the worst polluters on the planet, producing about 2% of the world's emissions even though it has just 33m people. It holds one of the worst track records
among industrialised states for living up to its commitment under the
Kyoto accords. By 2007, greenhouse gas emissions were 34% above the
target Canada agreed at Kyoto.
Canada's prime minister, Stephen
Harper, is resisting doing much more, committing to just a 6% cut over
1990 levels of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. "I see Harper's policy
as a continuation of the Bush agenda," said David Martin, climate
director for Greenpeace Canada.
A
key advisor to Obama made a similar point last week, comparing Canada's
current climate change policy to the inaction in America under George
Bush. "The Canadians would be well served by keeping up with what's
going on in the United States with respect to this push towards clean
technology," John Podesta, who oversaw Obama's transition team, told a
conference in Ottawa.
Environmentalists also fear that Harper
intends to exclude the Alberta tar sands - the heavy crude deposits
that have fuelled the rise in emissions - from any future greenhouse
gas emissions regime.
But the Harper government did relent on
forest protection, working with the Sahtu and Deh Cho First Nations to
set aside 40m acres in the Northwest Territories.
Canadian
provincial leaders have moved even more aggressively in recent years,
with Ontario committed to protecting 55m acres, or about half of its
forest, and Quebec committed to protecting 150m acres. "Canada is torn
between wanting to promote the tar sands and make money off it now, and
wanting to live up to its promises under the Kyoto accord. But as far
as protecting carbon rich ecosystems, particularly the boreal forest,
Canada is a world leader," said Kallick.