SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
US Expands Afghan Prison Rights
Prisoners
held by the US military in Afghanistan will for the first time have the
right to challenge their indefinite detention and call witnesses in
their defence, according to published reports.
The new system,
due to come into effect this week, would allow more than 600 Afghan
prisoners held at the Bagram military base to submit evidence in their
defence, The New York Times said on Saturday.
Sep 13, 2009
Prisoners
held by the US military in Afghanistan will for the first time have the
right to challenge their indefinite detention and call witnesses in
their defence, according to published reports.
The new system,
due to come into effect this week, would allow more than 600 Afghan
prisoners held at the Bagram military base to submit evidence in their
defence, The New York Times said on Saturday.
Citing
unnamed Pentagon officials, the newspaper said the new guidelines would
assign a US military official to each detainee, and would mark the
first substantive change in the overseas detention policies that Barack
Obama, the US president, inherited from the Bush administration.
These
officials would not be lawyers but could for the first time gather
witnesses and evidence on behalf of the detainees to challenge their
detention in proceedings before a military-appointed review board, the
report said.
'Helpful step'
Wahad Sadaat, the deputy
mayor of Kabul municipality, told Al Jazeera that having US military
officials facilitate the situation of detainees is a "helpful step".
"The legal assistance is of crucial importance but we should not
forget the weakened infrastructure of the judicial system in the
country," he said.
"The new arrangement looks very helpful in that it will somehow
address the need of the prisoners as well as the families they have
left behind."
International human rights organisations have long criticised
conditions at the Bagram facility, where detainees have been held -
many of them for six years.
But unlike the prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba,
the detainees have had no access to lawyers, no right to hear the
allegations against them, and only rudimentary reviews of their status
as "enemy combatants."
The changes are expected to be announced this week after an obligatory congressional review, The New York Times said.
As
part of a prison-wide protest that began in July, detainees at Bagram,
located north of Kabul, have refused visits from the International
Committee of the Red Cross and have declined recreation time and family
visits.
Human rights campaigners have argued that the prisoners
should be given the same rights as those at Guantanamo, but the US
military argues that Bagram detainees should be treated differently
because they are being held in an active theatre of war.
Their status is the subject of petitions in the US.
A
federal judge ruled in April that several Bagram detainees have the
right to challenge their detention in US courts, and the Obama
administration has asked a federal appeals court to overturn the
decision.
New system 'inadequate'
Ramzi
Kassem, a law professor at City University of New York and attorney
for a Bagram detainee, said the move is just "window dressing".
"The whole thing was meant to pull the wool over the eyes of the judicial system,'' he told The Associated Press.
"These changes don't come anywhere near an adequate substitute for a real review."
Kassem said the changes appear to amount to a review by a military representative assigned to a detainee.
The
representative would not be bound by confidentality, thus making this
system similar to one already rejected by the US Supreme Court in 2008.
"These improvements are really just smoke and mirrors,'' Kassem said.
Kassem represents Amin al-Bakri, a Yemeni national who was taken to Bagram after being detained in Thailand in 2002.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Prisoners
held by the US military in Afghanistan will for the first time have the
right to challenge their indefinite detention and call witnesses in
their defence, according to published reports.
The new system,
due to come into effect this week, would allow more than 600 Afghan
prisoners held at the Bagram military base to submit evidence in their
defence, The New York Times said on Saturday.
Citing
unnamed Pentagon officials, the newspaper said the new guidelines would
assign a US military official to each detainee, and would mark the
first substantive change in the overseas detention policies that Barack
Obama, the US president, inherited from the Bush administration.
These
officials would not be lawyers but could for the first time gather
witnesses and evidence on behalf of the detainees to challenge their
detention in proceedings before a military-appointed review board, the
report said.
'Helpful step'
Wahad Sadaat, the deputy
mayor of Kabul municipality, told Al Jazeera that having US military
officials facilitate the situation of detainees is a "helpful step".
"The legal assistance is of crucial importance but we should not
forget the weakened infrastructure of the judicial system in the
country," he said.
"The new arrangement looks very helpful in that it will somehow
address the need of the prisoners as well as the families they have
left behind."
International human rights organisations have long criticised
conditions at the Bagram facility, where detainees have been held -
many of them for six years.
But unlike the prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba,
the detainees have had no access to lawyers, no right to hear the
allegations against them, and only rudimentary reviews of their status
as "enemy combatants."
The changes are expected to be announced this week after an obligatory congressional review, The New York Times said.
As
part of a prison-wide protest that began in July, detainees at Bagram,
located north of Kabul, have refused visits from the International
Committee of the Red Cross and have declined recreation time and family
visits.
Human rights campaigners have argued that the prisoners
should be given the same rights as those at Guantanamo, but the US
military argues that Bagram detainees should be treated differently
because they are being held in an active theatre of war.
Their status is the subject of petitions in the US.
A
federal judge ruled in April that several Bagram detainees have the
right to challenge their detention in US courts, and the Obama
administration has asked a federal appeals court to overturn the
decision.
New system 'inadequate'
Ramzi
Kassem, a law professor at City University of New York and attorney
for a Bagram detainee, said the move is just "window dressing".
"The whole thing was meant to pull the wool over the eyes of the judicial system,'' he told The Associated Press.
"These changes don't come anywhere near an adequate substitute for a real review."
Kassem said the changes appear to amount to a review by a military representative assigned to a detainee.
The
representative would not be bound by confidentality, thus making this
system similar to one already rejected by the US Supreme Court in 2008.
"These improvements are really just smoke and mirrors,'' Kassem said.
Kassem represents Amin al-Bakri, a Yemeni national who was taken to Bagram after being detained in Thailand in 2002.
Prisoners
held by the US military in Afghanistan will for the first time have the
right to challenge their indefinite detention and call witnesses in
their defence, according to published reports.
The new system,
due to come into effect this week, would allow more than 600 Afghan
prisoners held at the Bagram military base to submit evidence in their
defence, The New York Times said on Saturday.
Citing
unnamed Pentagon officials, the newspaper said the new guidelines would
assign a US military official to each detainee, and would mark the
first substantive change in the overseas detention policies that Barack
Obama, the US president, inherited from the Bush administration.
These
officials would not be lawyers but could for the first time gather
witnesses and evidence on behalf of the detainees to challenge their
detention in proceedings before a military-appointed review board, the
report said.
'Helpful step'
Wahad Sadaat, the deputy
mayor of Kabul municipality, told Al Jazeera that having US military
officials facilitate the situation of detainees is a "helpful step".
"The legal assistance is of crucial importance but we should not
forget the weakened infrastructure of the judicial system in the
country," he said.
"The new arrangement looks very helpful in that it will somehow
address the need of the prisoners as well as the families they have
left behind."
International human rights organisations have long criticised
conditions at the Bagram facility, where detainees have been held -
many of them for six years.
But unlike the prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba,
the detainees have had no access to lawyers, no right to hear the
allegations against them, and only rudimentary reviews of their status
as "enemy combatants."
The changes are expected to be announced this week after an obligatory congressional review, The New York Times said.
As
part of a prison-wide protest that began in July, detainees at Bagram,
located north of Kabul, have refused visits from the International
Committee of the Red Cross and have declined recreation time and family
visits.
Human rights campaigners have argued that the prisoners
should be given the same rights as those at Guantanamo, but the US
military argues that Bagram detainees should be treated differently
because they are being held in an active theatre of war.
Their status is the subject of petitions in the US.
A
federal judge ruled in April that several Bagram detainees have the
right to challenge their detention in US courts, and the Obama
administration has asked a federal appeals court to overturn the
decision.
New system 'inadequate'
Ramzi
Kassem, a law professor at City University of New York and attorney
for a Bagram detainee, said the move is just "window dressing".
"The whole thing was meant to pull the wool over the eyes of the judicial system,'' he told The Associated Press.
"These changes don't come anywhere near an adequate substitute for a real review."
Kassem said the changes appear to amount to a review by a military representative assigned to a detainee.
The
representative would not be bound by confidentality, thus making this
system similar to one already rejected by the US Supreme Court in 2008.
"These improvements are really just smoke and mirrors,'' Kassem said.
Kassem represents Amin al-Bakri, a Yemeni national who was taken to Bagram after being detained in Thailand in 2002.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.