To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Prisoners
held by the US military in Afghanistan will for the first time have the
right to challenge their indefinite detention and call witnesses in
their defence, according to published reports.
The new system,
due to come into effect this week, would allow more than 600 Afghan
prisoners held at the Bagram military base to submit evidence in their
defence, The New York Times said on Saturday.
Prisoners
held by the US military in Afghanistan will for the first time have the
right to challenge their indefinite detention and call witnesses in
their defence, according to published reports.
The new system,
due to come into effect this week, would allow more than 600 Afghan
prisoners held at the Bagram military base to submit evidence in their
defence, The New York Times said on Saturday.
Citing
unnamed Pentagon officials, the newspaper said the new guidelines would
assign a US military official to each detainee, and would mark the
first substantive change in the overseas detention policies that Barack
Obama, the US president, inherited from the Bush administration.
These
officials would not be lawyers but could for the first time gather
witnesses and evidence on behalf of the detainees to challenge their
detention in proceedings before a military-appointed review board, the
report said.
'Helpful step'
Wahad Sadaat, the deputy
mayor of Kabul municipality, told Al Jazeera that having US military
officials facilitate the situation of detainees is a "helpful step".
"The legal assistance is of crucial importance but we should not
forget the weakened infrastructure of the judicial system in the
country," he said.
"The new arrangement looks very helpful in that it will somehow
address the need of the prisoners as well as the families they have
left behind."
International human rights organisations have long criticised
conditions at the Bagram facility, where detainees have been held -
many of them for six years.
But unlike the prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba,
the detainees have had no access to lawyers, no right to hear the
allegations against them, and only rudimentary reviews of their status
as "enemy combatants."
The changes are expected to be announced this week after an obligatory congressional review, The New York Times said.
As
part of a prison-wide protest that began in July, detainees at Bagram,
located north of Kabul, have refused visits from the International
Committee of the Red Cross and have declined recreation time and family
visits.
Human rights campaigners have argued that the prisoners
should be given the same rights as those at Guantanamo, but the US
military argues that Bagram detainees should be treated differently
because they are being held in an active theatre of war.
Their status is the subject of petitions in the US.
A
federal judge ruled in April that several Bagram detainees have the
right to challenge their detention in US courts, and the Obama
administration has asked a federal appeals court to overturn the
decision.
New system 'inadequate'
Ramzi
Kassem, a law professor at City University of New York and attorney
for a Bagram detainee, said the move is just "window dressing".
"The whole thing was meant to pull the wool over the eyes of the judicial system,'' he told The Associated Press.
"These changes don't come anywhere near an adequate substitute for a real review."
Kassem said the changes appear to amount to a review by a military representative assigned to a detainee.
The
representative would not be bound by confidentality, thus making this
system similar to one already rejected by the US Supreme Court in 2008.
"These improvements are really just smoke and mirrors,'' Kassem said.
Kassem represents Amin al-Bakri, a Yemeni national who was taken to Bagram after being detained in Thailand in 2002.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Prisoners
held by the US military in Afghanistan will for the first time have the
right to challenge their indefinite detention and call witnesses in
their defence, according to published reports.
The new system,
due to come into effect this week, would allow more than 600 Afghan
prisoners held at the Bagram military base to submit evidence in their
defence, The New York Times said on Saturday.
Citing
unnamed Pentagon officials, the newspaper said the new guidelines would
assign a US military official to each detainee, and would mark the
first substantive change in the overseas detention policies that Barack
Obama, the US president, inherited from the Bush administration.
These
officials would not be lawyers but could for the first time gather
witnesses and evidence on behalf of the detainees to challenge their
detention in proceedings before a military-appointed review board, the
report said.
'Helpful step'
Wahad Sadaat, the deputy
mayor of Kabul municipality, told Al Jazeera that having US military
officials facilitate the situation of detainees is a "helpful step".
"The legal assistance is of crucial importance but we should not
forget the weakened infrastructure of the judicial system in the
country," he said.
"The new arrangement looks very helpful in that it will somehow
address the need of the prisoners as well as the families they have
left behind."
International human rights organisations have long criticised
conditions at the Bagram facility, where detainees have been held -
many of them for six years.
But unlike the prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba,
the detainees have had no access to lawyers, no right to hear the
allegations against them, and only rudimentary reviews of their status
as "enemy combatants."
The changes are expected to be announced this week after an obligatory congressional review, The New York Times said.
As
part of a prison-wide protest that began in July, detainees at Bagram,
located north of Kabul, have refused visits from the International
Committee of the Red Cross and have declined recreation time and family
visits.
Human rights campaigners have argued that the prisoners
should be given the same rights as those at Guantanamo, but the US
military argues that Bagram detainees should be treated differently
because they are being held in an active theatre of war.
Their status is the subject of petitions in the US.
A
federal judge ruled in April that several Bagram detainees have the
right to challenge their detention in US courts, and the Obama
administration has asked a federal appeals court to overturn the
decision.
New system 'inadequate'
Ramzi
Kassem, a law professor at City University of New York and attorney
for a Bagram detainee, said the move is just "window dressing".
"The whole thing was meant to pull the wool over the eyes of the judicial system,'' he told The Associated Press.
"These changes don't come anywhere near an adequate substitute for a real review."
Kassem said the changes appear to amount to a review by a military representative assigned to a detainee.
The
representative would not be bound by confidentality, thus making this
system similar to one already rejected by the US Supreme Court in 2008.
"These improvements are really just smoke and mirrors,'' Kassem said.
Kassem represents Amin al-Bakri, a Yemeni national who was taken to Bagram after being detained in Thailand in 2002.
Prisoners
held by the US military in Afghanistan will for the first time have the
right to challenge their indefinite detention and call witnesses in
their defence, according to published reports.
The new system,
due to come into effect this week, would allow more than 600 Afghan
prisoners held at the Bagram military base to submit evidence in their
defence, The New York Times said on Saturday.
Citing
unnamed Pentagon officials, the newspaper said the new guidelines would
assign a US military official to each detainee, and would mark the
first substantive change in the overseas detention policies that Barack
Obama, the US president, inherited from the Bush administration.
These
officials would not be lawyers but could for the first time gather
witnesses and evidence on behalf of the detainees to challenge their
detention in proceedings before a military-appointed review board, the
report said.
'Helpful step'
Wahad Sadaat, the deputy
mayor of Kabul municipality, told Al Jazeera that having US military
officials facilitate the situation of detainees is a "helpful step".
"The legal assistance is of crucial importance but we should not
forget the weakened infrastructure of the judicial system in the
country," he said.
"The new arrangement looks very helpful in that it will somehow
address the need of the prisoners as well as the families they have
left behind."
International human rights organisations have long criticised
conditions at the Bagram facility, where detainees have been held -
many of them for six years.
But unlike the prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba,
the detainees have had no access to lawyers, no right to hear the
allegations against them, and only rudimentary reviews of their status
as "enemy combatants."
The changes are expected to be announced this week after an obligatory congressional review, The New York Times said.
As
part of a prison-wide protest that began in July, detainees at Bagram,
located north of Kabul, have refused visits from the International
Committee of the Red Cross and have declined recreation time and family
visits.
Human rights campaigners have argued that the prisoners
should be given the same rights as those at Guantanamo, but the US
military argues that Bagram detainees should be treated differently
because they are being held in an active theatre of war.
Their status is the subject of petitions in the US.
A
federal judge ruled in April that several Bagram detainees have the
right to challenge their detention in US courts, and the Obama
administration has asked a federal appeals court to overturn the
decision.
New system 'inadequate'
Ramzi
Kassem, a law professor at City University of New York and attorney
for a Bagram detainee, said the move is just "window dressing".
"The whole thing was meant to pull the wool over the eyes of the judicial system,'' he told The Associated Press.
"These changes don't come anywhere near an adequate substitute for a real review."
Kassem said the changes appear to amount to a review by a military representative assigned to a detainee.
The
representative would not be bound by confidentality, thus making this
system similar to one already rejected by the US Supreme Court in 2008.
"These improvements are really just smoke and mirrors,'' Kassem said.
Kassem represents Amin al-Bakri, a Yemeni national who was taken to Bagram after being detained in Thailand in 2002.