SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Afghanistan Calls for Media Blackout Ahead of Election
Offical say that reporting of violence would create a climate of fear and keep voters away
Aug 19, 2009
Afghanistan
has ordered all journalists not to report incidents of violence during
tomorrow's presidential election amid fears that such coverage will
deter people from voting.
Two decrees were issued, one from the
foreign ministry banning all broadcasts of information about violence
while polls were open, and the other from the interior ministry
requiring reporters to keep away from the scene of any attacks.
Although
the English version of the foreign ministry's decree spoke of a
"request", the version in Dari, one of Afghanistan's official
languages, said reporting on violence during the election would be
"strictly forbidden".
"We have taken this decision in the
national interest of Afghanistan in order to encourage people and raise
their morale to come out and vote," Siamak Herawi, a spokesman for
President Hamid Karzai, told Reuters.
"This decision will control
the negative impact of the media. If something happens, this will
prevent them from exaggerating it, so that people will not be
frightened to come out and vote."
It was unclear how the
government intended to enforce the ban and Rachel Reid, the Afghanistan
researcher for Human Rights Watch, said freedom of expression is
enshrined in the Afghan constitution. The head of the Afghan
Independent Journalists' Association (AIJA) said the decrees would not
stop Afghan and foreign journalists from providing information to the
public during the crucial election period.
"It shows the weakness
of the government and we condemn such moves to deprive people from
accessing news," Rahimullah Samander said.
Taliban militants have
vowed to disrupt the election and authorities fear reports of violence
on election day could intimidate those wanting to vote and damage the
credibility of any result.
A suicide car bomber
killed eight people and wounded more than 50 in Kabul yesterday, one of
several attacks countrywide. Dozens of journalists were on the scene
within minutes of the blast. The Taliban leader, Mullah Omar, has
called on Afghans to boycott the vote and one commander has reportedly
warned villagers in the south where the Taliban are strongest that
voters found with indelible ink would have their fingers cut off.
The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, said the surge in violence from the Taliban reflected a deliberate campaign to intimidate voters ahead of the election. Clinton told reporters at the state department yesterday that the Taliban hope their attacks will create a climate of fear that will keep people away from the ballot boxes.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Afghanistan
has ordered all journalists not to report incidents of violence during
tomorrow's presidential election amid fears that such coverage will
deter people from voting.
Two decrees were issued, one from the
foreign ministry banning all broadcasts of information about violence
while polls were open, and the other from the interior ministry
requiring reporters to keep away from the scene of any attacks.
Although
the English version of the foreign ministry's decree spoke of a
"request", the version in Dari, one of Afghanistan's official
languages, said reporting on violence during the election would be
"strictly forbidden".
"We have taken this decision in the
national interest of Afghanistan in order to encourage people and raise
their morale to come out and vote," Siamak Herawi, a spokesman for
President Hamid Karzai, told Reuters.
"This decision will control
the negative impact of the media. If something happens, this will
prevent them from exaggerating it, so that people will not be
frightened to come out and vote."
It was unclear how the
government intended to enforce the ban and Rachel Reid, the Afghanistan
researcher for Human Rights Watch, said freedom of expression is
enshrined in the Afghan constitution. The head of the Afghan
Independent Journalists' Association (AIJA) said the decrees would not
stop Afghan and foreign journalists from providing information to the
public during the crucial election period.
"It shows the weakness
of the government and we condemn such moves to deprive people from
accessing news," Rahimullah Samander said.
Taliban militants have
vowed to disrupt the election and authorities fear reports of violence
on election day could intimidate those wanting to vote and damage the
credibility of any result.
A suicide car bomber
killed eight people and wounded more than 50 in Kabul yesterday, one of
several attacks countrywide. Dozens of journalists were on the scene
within minutes of the blast. The Taliban leader, Mullah Omar, has
called on Afghans to boycott the vote and one commander has reportedly
warned villagers in the south where the Taliban are strongest that
voters found with indelible ink would have their fingers cut off.
The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, said the surge in violence from the Taliban reflected a deliberate campaign to intimidate voters ahead of the election. Clinton told reporters at the state department yesterday that the Taliban hope their attacks will create a climate of fear that will keep people away from the ballot boxes.
Afghanistan
has ordered all journalists not to report incidents of violence during
tomorrow's presidential election amid fears that such coverage will
deter people from voting.
Two decrees were issued, one from the
foreign ministry banning all broadcasts of information about violence
while polls were open, and the other from the interior ministry
requiring reporters to keep away from the scene of any attacks.
Although
the English version of the foreign ministry's decree spoke of a
"request", the version in Dari, one of Afghanistan's official
languages, said reporting on violence during the election would be
"strictly forbidden".
"We have taken this decision in the
national interest of Afghanistan in order to encourage people and raise
their morale to come out and vote," Siamak Herawi, a spokesman for
President Hamid Karzai, told Reuters.
"This decision will control
the negative impact of the media. If something happens, this will
prevent them from exaggerating it, so that people will not be
frightened to come out and vote."
It was unclear how the
government intended to enforce the ban and Rachel Reid, the Afghanistan
researcher for Human Rights Watch, said freedom of expression is
enshrined in the Afghan constitution. The head of the Afghan
Independent Journalists' Association (AIJA) said the decrees would not
stop Afghan and foreign journalists from providing information to the
public during the crucial election period.
"It shows the weakness
of the government and we condemn such moves to deprive people from
accessing news," Rahimullah Samander said.
Taliban militants have
vowed to disrupt the election and authorities fear reports of violence
on election day could intimidate those wanting to vote and damage the
credibility of any result.
A suicide car bomber
killed eight people and wounded more than 50 in Kabul yesterday, one of
several attacks countrywide. Dozens of journalists were on the scene
within minutes of the blast. The Taliban leader, Mullah Omar, has
called on Afghans to boycott the vote and one commander has reportedly
warned villagers in the south where the Taliban are strongest that
voters found with indelible ink would have their fingers cut off.
The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, said the surge in violence from the Taliban reflected a deliberate campaign to intimidate voters ahead of the election. Clinton told reporters at the state department yesterday that the Taliban hope their attacks will create a climate of fear that will keep people away from the ballot boxes.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy