"Sens. Booker and Hirono specifically stated that they were releasing specific relevant "committee confidential" documents regardless of the illegitimate designation." (Photo: Screenshot)
Democrats' Civil Disobedience for American Values at the Sham SCOTUS Hearing
No Supreme Court confirmation process has been infected with corruption at this scale in modern times, perhaps ever
The GOP's effort to sell the Brett Kavanaugh hearings as legitimate crumbled even further as soon as Day Three began.
Chairman Grassley insisted the "committee confidential" process was fair and gave all senators plenty of time to make certain documents public. He read from a memo he claims to have sent to all members on August 22, setting a deadline for August 28 for them to submit requests for specific documents to be re-designated as publicly available.
So when thousands of records were dumped hours before the hearing began, senators were supposed to have asked Grassley for permission to re-designate specific documents by nearly a week earlier?
Democratic senators pointed out that the secret documents have nothing personal, nothing implicating national security, nothing at all sensitive--except that they reveal unflattering aspects of Kavanaugh's record that would make it all the more clear that he should not be confirmed.
Sens. Booker and Hirono specifically stated that they were releasing specific relevant "committee confidential" documents regardless of the illegitimate designation. Booker, announcing the release of documents on Kavanaugh and racial profiling, accurately called this civil disobedience.
\u201cSen. @CoryBooker says he is releasing one of Kavanaugh's \u201ccommittee confidential\u201d emails, titled "Racial profiling," as an act of civil disobedience! Here is an example of the documents they are talking about: https://t.co/ZSLaPej8pe #StopKavanaugh #WhatAreTheyHiding\u201d— People For the American Way (@People For the American Way) 1536242640
Other Democrats agreed, making clear they do not accept the legitimacy of this hearing and of the "committee confidential" process. Ranking member Dianne Feinstein states that 190,000 documents have been so designated.
\u201c\u201cAll of these documents belong to the people of the Unites States.. and they will come out eventually, so shame on my colleagues if they conceal them now.\u201d \u2013@SenBlumenthal #StopKavanaugh #WhatAreTheyHiding\u201d— People For the American Way (@People For the American Way) 1536242640
It has been clear from the start that this is a partisan process, designed to hide rather than reveal the nominee's record.
- After meeting with President Trump, Grassley chose not to ask the National Archives to provide records from Kavanaugh's three years as George W. Bush's staff secretary, a job of importance and substance that Kavanaugh himself has called relevant to his qualifications.
- Although the National Archives informed Grassley that they could not begin providing records until early October, Chairman scheduled the hearing for early September.
- Instead of getting records from the nonpartisan Archives, it's Kavanaugh's fellow Republican and former deputy Bill Burck who is deciding which documents will be released.
No Supreme Court confirmation process has been infected with corruption at this scale in modern times, perhaps ever. It threatens democracy, and that is its purpose.
Let's hear it for civil disobedience.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The GOP's effort to sell the Brett Kavanaugh hearings as legitimate crumbled even further as soon as Day Three began.
Chairman Grassley insisted the "committee confidential" process was fair and gave all senators plenty of time to make certain documents public. He read from a memo he claims to have sent to all members on August 22, setting a deadline for August 28 for them to submit requests for specific documents to be re-designated as publicly available.
So when thousands of records were dumped hours before the hearing began, senators were supposed to have asked Grassley for permission to re-designate specific documents by nearly a week earlier?
Democratic senators pointed out that the secret documents have nothing personal, nothing implicating national security, nothing at all sensitive--except that they reveal unflattering aspects of Kavanaugh's record that would make it all the more clear that he should not be confirmed.
Sens. Booker and Hirono specifically stated that they were releasing specific relevant "committee confidential" documents regardless of the illegitimate designation. Booker, announcing the release of documents on Kavanaugh and racial profiling, accurately called this civil disobedience.
\u201cSen. @CoryBooker says he is releasing one of Kavanaugh's \u201ccommittee confidential\u201d emails, titled "Racial profiling," as an act of civil disobedience! Here is an example of the documents they are talking about: https://t.co/ZSLaPej8pe #StopKavanaugh #WhatAreTheyHiding\u201d— People For the American Way (@People For the American Way) 1536242640
Other Democrats agreed, making clear they do not accept the legitimacy of this hearing and of the "committee confidential" process. Ranking member Dianne Feinstein states that 190,000 documents have been so designated.
\u201c\u201cAll of these documents belong to the people of the Unites States.. and they will come out eventually, so shame on my colleagues if they conceal them now.\u201d \u2013@SenBlumenthal #StopKavanaugh #WhatAreTheyHiding\u201d— People For the American Way (@People For the American Way) 1536242640
It has been clear from the start that this is a partisan process, designed to hide rather than reveal the nominee's record.
- After meeting with President Trump, Grassley chose not to ask the National Archives to provide records from Kavanaugh's three years as George W. Bush's staff secretary, a job of importance and substance that Kavanaugh himself has called relevant to his qualifications.
- Although the National Archives informed Grassley that they could not begin providing records until early October, Chairman scheduled the hearing for early September.
- Instead of getting records from the nonpartisan Archives, it's Kavanaugh's fellow Republican and former deputy Bill Burck who is deciding which documents will be released.
No Supreme Court confirmation process has been infected with corruption at this scale in modern times, perhaps ever. It threatens democracy, and that is its purpose.
Let's hear it for civil disobedience.
The GOP's effort to sell the Brett Kavanaugh hearings as legitimate crumbled even further as soon as Day Three began.
Chairman Grassley insisted the "committee confidential" process was fair and gave all senators plenty of time to make certain documents public. He read from a memo he claims to have sent to all members on August 22, setting a deadline for August 28 for them to submit requests for specific documents to be re-designated as publicly available.
So when thousands of records were dumped hours before the hearing began, senators were supposed to have asked Grassley for permission to re-designate specific documents by nearly a week earlier?
Democratic senators pointed out that the secret documents have nothing personal, nothing implicating national security, nothing at all sensitive--except that they reveal unflattering aspects of Kavanaugh's record that would make it all the more clear that he should not be confirmed.
Sens. Booker and Hirono specifically stated that they were releasing specific relevant "committee confidential" documents regardless of the illegitimate designation. Booker, announcing the release of documents on Kavanaugh and racial profiling, accurately called this civil disobedience.
\u201cSen. @CoryBooker says he is releasing one of Kavanaugh's \u201ccommittee confidential\u201d emails, titled "Racial profiling," as an act of civil disobedience! Here is an example of the documents they are talking about: https://t.co/ZSLaPej8pe #StopKavanaugh #WhatAreTheyHiding\u201d— People For the American Way (@People For the American Way) 1536242640
Other Democrats agreed, making clear they do not accept the legitimacy of this hearing and of the "committee confidential" process. Ranking member Dianne Feinstein states that 190,000 documents have been so designated.
\u201c\u201cAll of these documents belong to the people of the Unites States.. and they will come out eventually, so shame on my colleagues if they conceal them now.\u201d \u2013@SenBlumenthal #StopKavanaugh #WhatAreTheyHiding\u201d— People For the American Way (@People For the American Way) 1536242640
It has been clear from the start that this is a partisan process, designed to hide rather than reveal the nominee's record.
- After meeting with President Trump, Grassley chose not to ask the National Archives to provide records from Kavanaugh's three years as George W. Bush's staff secretary, a job of importance and substance that Kavanaugh himself has called relevant to his qualifications.
- Although the National Archives informed Grassley that they could not begin providing records until early October, Chairman scheduled the hearing for early September.
- Instead of getting records from the nonpartisan Archives, it's Kavanaugh's fellow Republican and former deputy Bill Burck who is deciding which documents will be released.
No Supreme Court confirmation process has been infected with corruption at this scale in modern times, perhaps ever. It threatens democracy, and that is its purpose.
Let's hear it for civil disobedience.