

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, in 2016. (Photo: Getty Images)
Sadiq Khan as mayor of London is the opposite of Trump in every way. Trump was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. Khan is a second-generation emigrant whose father drove a bus. Trump hates immigrants and Muslims (though of course there is a sense in which Trump is a 2nd-generation immigrant as well, since his mother was from Scotland). Khan is both the child of immigrants and a Muslim.
Sadiq Khan is a far better leader than Trump, with his priorities straight.
Khan supports infrastructural improvements in London, which studies show would add $33 bn. to the UK economy. Trump's promises of infrastructural improvements to the US have never materialized, being typically just hot air.
Khan is pressing for gasoline and diesel cars to be banned in the UK by 2030, which will help save the earth from rapid and extreme global heating.
Khan is pushing 500 million pounds in energy efficiency measures, which will save money and cut emissions.
Khan's centrality to British politics is greater than it might seem on the surface, and he represents Britain's future while Trump is plumping for an idealized and in fact non-existent British past.
But there are bigger structural issues in the feud between the two. London has been growing faster than the rest of the UK, and some of its growth depends on remaining in the European Union. It voted against Brexit, in contrast to some of the country's more hardscrabble areas where the economy has been stagnant for a long time.
Not only is London a rare UK economic success story, but it is an engine of UK economic growth in general.
London, a city of over 8 million people, is the largest by far in the UK (pop. 65 mn.). Some of its economic and social dynamism comes from its large immigrant population, of several generations. Over 3 million of its residents are first-generation immigrants. Only 48%, less than a majority, of Londoners say they are Christian. A good fifth say they don't really have a religion. Some 12 percent are Muslim, 5 percent Hindu, 2 percent Jewish. An amazing 1.5 percent are Sikh, and 1 percent are Buddhist.
So when Trump warns against letting immigrants into the UK lest white Christians "lose their culture" (an essentially Nazi meme), he is attacking London itself. Only a tiny percentage of Britons agrees with Trump, and most of them don't live in London. Trump's ridiculous nativism shows, as usual, complete ignorance about British history, which has all along been multicultural.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Sadiq Khan as mayor of London is the opposite of Trump in every way. Trump was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. Khan is a second-generation emigrant whose father drove a bus. Trump hates immigrants and Muslims (though of course there is a sense in which Trump is a 2nd-generation immigrant as well, since his mother was from Scotland). Khan is both the child of immigrants and a Muslim.
Sadiq Khan is a far better leader than Trump, with his priorities straight.
Khan supports infrastructural improvements in London, which studies show would add $33 bn. to the UK economy. Trump's promises of infrastructural improvements to the US have never materialized, being typically just hot air.
Khan is pressing for gasoline and diesel cars to be banned in the UK by 2030, which will help save the earth from rapid and extreme global heating.
Khan is pushing 500 million pounds in energy efficiency measures, which will save money and cut emissions.
Khan's centrality to British politics is greater than it might seem on the surface, and he represents Britain's future while Trump is plumping for an idealized and in fact non-existent British past.
But there are bigger structural issues in the feud between the two. London has been growing faster than the rest of the UK, and some of its growth depends on remaining in the European Union. It voted against Brexit, in contrast to some of the country's more hardscrabble areas where the economy has been stagnant for a long time.
Not only is London a rare UK economic success story, but it is an engine of UK economic growth in general.
London, a city of over 8 million people, is the largest by far in the UK (pop. 65 mn.). Some of its economic and social dynamism comes from its large immigrant population, of several generations. Over 3 million of its residents are first-generation immigrants. Only 48%, less than a majority, of Londoners say they are Christian. A good fifth say they don't really have a religion. Some 12 percent are Muslim, 5 percent Hindu, 2 percent Jewish. An amazing 1.5 percent are Sikh, and 1 percent are Buddhist.
So when Trump warns against letting immigrants into the UK lest white Christians "lose their culture" (an essentially Nazi meme), he is attacking London itself. Only a tiny percentage of Britons agrees with Trump, and most of them don't live in London. Trump's ridiculous nativism shows, as usual, complete ignorance about British history, which has all along been multicultural.
Sadiq Khan as mayor of London is the opposite of Trump in every way. Trump was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. Khan is a second-generation emigrant whose father drove a bus. Trump hates immigrants and Muslims (though of course there is a sense in which Trump is a 2nd-generation immigrant as well, since his mother was from Scotland). Khan is both the child of immigrants and a Muslim.
Sadiq Khan is a far better leader than Trump, with his priorities straight.
Khan supports infrastructural improvements in London, which studies show would add $33 bn. to the UK economy. Trump's promises of infrastructural improvements to the US have never materialized, being typically just hot air.
Khan is pressing for gasoline and diesel cars to be banned in the UK by 2030, which will help save the earth from rapid and extreme global heating.
Khan is pushing 500 million pounds in energy efficiency measures, which will save money and cut emissions.
Khan's centrality to British politics is greater than it might seem on the surface, and he represents Britain's future while Trump is plumping for an idealized and in fact non-existent British past.
But there are bigger structural issues in the feud between the two. London has been growing faster than the rest of the UK, and some of its growth depends on remaining in the European Union. It voted against Brexit, in contrast to some of the country's more hardscrabble areas where the economy has been stagnant for a long time.
Not only is London a rare UK economic success story, but it is an engine of UK economic growth in general.
London, a city of over 8 million people, is the largest by far in the UK (pop. 65 mn.). Some of its economic and social dynamism comes from its large immigrant population, of several generations. Over 3 million of its residents are first-generation immigrants. Only 48%, less than a majority, of Londoners say they are Christian. A good fifth say they don't really have a religion. Some 12 percent are Muslim, 5 percent Hindu, 2 percent Jewish. An amazing 1.5 percent are Sikh, and 1 percent are Buddhist.
So when Trump warns against letting immigrants into the UK lest white Christians "lose their culture" (an essentially Nazi meme), he is attacking London itself. Only a tiny percentage of Britons agrees with Trump, and most of them don't live in London. Trump's ridiculous nativism shows, as usual, complete ignorance about British history, which has all along been multicultural.