SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Pregnant Employees Have the Same Right to Light-Duty as Other Workers
Dec 03, 2014
Peggy Young worked for UPS delivering letters and packages. When she became pregnant, her doctor recommended that she avoid lifting more than 20 pounds. She requested a light-duty position so she would not have to lift heavy packages.
Sounds reasonable, right? Not to UPS it didn't.
Instead, the company denied Peggy's request and forced her to take unpaid leave, even though the world's largest shipping and logistics company routinely provides such accommodations to other workers temporarily unable to perform their regular tasks because of on-the-job injuries, disabilities covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, or loss of their commercial drivers' licenses.
Pushing Peggy out on unpaid leave was particularly difficult because she needed to prepare for the expenses of having a baby. In addition to losing her salary, she lost her health benefits, which were necessary for her pregnancy-related care.
Today the Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case, Young v. UPS. The question before the court is whether, and in what circumstances, an employer that provides accommodations to some employees with work limitations must provide the same accommodations to pregnant employees who are similar in their ability or inability to work.
We filed a friend of the court brief in support of Peggy Young. We argued that Peggy, like all pregnant workers who need temporary accommodations, is entitled to the same kinds of light-duty assignments employers routinely make available to disabled and injured workers.
This case is critically important because Peggy's situation is not an isolated case. In fact, it's pretty typical of pregnant workers who request accommodations and instead are pushed to take unpaid leave. Losing their jobs when they are pregnant can pose significant difficulties, particularly for low-income women. For example, our client Asia Myers, a nursing assistant at a nursing home, was not allowed to come to work after she experienced pregnancy complications and was told not to lift by her doctor. Being out of work made it nearly impossible for her to make ends meet, and she watched the bills pile up.
These incidents have long-term effects on women's ability to maintain stable careers and achieve equality in the workforce. Half of all workers are women and 75 percent of women will become pregnant during their working lives. Women's income - before, during, and after pregnancy - is critical to their families' well-being, and the loss of that income threatens their families' financial security.
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act was passed to level the playing field and ensure that pregnant women can remain productive members of the workforce. We are hopeful that the Supreme Court will clarify that this law requires employers to provide the same accommodations to pregnant women that they provide to other injured workers.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 ACLU
Peggy Young worked for UPS delivering letters and packages. When she became pregnant, her doctor recommended that she avoid lifting more than 20 pounds. She requested a light-duty position so she would not have to lift heavy packages.
Sounds reasonable, right? Not to UPS it didn't.
Instead, the company denied Peggy's request and forced her to take unpaid leave, even though the world's largest shipping and logistics company routinely provides such accommodations to other workers temporarily unable to perform their regular tasks because of on-the-job injuries, disabilities covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, or loss of their commercial drivers' licenses.
Pushing Peggy out on unpaid leave was particularly difficult because she needed to prepare for the expenses of having a baby. In addition to losing her salary, she lost her health benefits, which were necessary for her pregnancy-related care.
Today the Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case, Young v. UPS. The question before the court is whether, and in what circumstances, an employer that provides accommodations to some employees with work limitations must provide the same accommodations to pregnant employees who are similar in their ability or inability to work.
We filed a friend of the court brief in support of Peggy Young. We argued that Peggy, like all pregnant workers who need temporary accommodations, is entitled to the same kinds of light-duty assignments employers routinely make available to disabled and injured workers.
This case is critically important because Peggy's situation is not an isolated case. In fact, it's pretty typical of pregnant workers who request accommodations and instead are pushed to take unpaid leave. Losing their jobs when they are pregnant can pose significant difficulties, particularly for low-income women. For example, our client Asia Myers, a nursing assistant at a nursing home, was not allowed to come to work after she experienced pregnancy complications and was told not to lift by her doctor. Being out of work made it nearly impossible for her to make ends meet, and she watched the bills pile up.
These incidents have long-term effects on women's ability to maintain stable careers and achieve equality in the workforce. Half of all workers are women and 75 percent of women will become pregnant during their working lives. Women's income - before, during, and after pregnancy - is critical to their families' well-being, and the loss of that income threatens their families' financial security.
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act was passed to level the playing field and ensure that pregnant women can remain productive members of the workforce. We are hopeful that the Supreme Court will clarify that this law requires employers to provide the same accommodations to pregnant women that they provide to other injured workers.
Peggy Young worked for UPS delivering letters and packages. When she became pregnant, her doctor recommended that she avoid lifting more than 20 pounds. She requested a light-duty position so she would not have to lift heavy packages.
Sounds reasonable, right? Not to UPS it didn't.
Instead, the company denied Peggy's request and forced her to take unpaid leave, even though the world's largest shipping and logistics company routinely provides such accommodations to other workers temporarily unable to perform their regular tasks because of on-the-job injuries, disabilities covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, or loss of their commercial drivers' licenses.
Pushing Peggy out on unpaid leave was particularly difficult because she needed to prepare for the expenses of having a baby. In addition to losing her salary, she lost her health benefits, which were necessary for her pregnancy-related care.
Today the Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case, Young v. UPS. The question before the court is whether, and in what circumstances, an employer that provides accommodations to some employees with work limitations must provide the same accommodations to pregnant employees who are similar in their ability or inability to work.
We filed a friend of the court brief in support of Peggy Young. We argued that Peggy, like all pregnant workers who need temporary accommodations, is entitled to the same kinds of light-duty assignments employers routinely make available to disabled and injured workers.
This case is critically important because Peggy's situation is not an isolated case. In fact, it's pretty typical of pregnant workers who request accommodations and instead are pushed to take unpaid leave. Losing their jobs when they are pregnant can pose significant difficulties, particularly for low-income women. For example, our client Asia Myers, a nursing assistant at a nursing home, was not allowed to come to work after she experienced pregnancy complications and was told not to lift by her doctor. Being out of work made it nearly impossible for her to make ends meet, and she watched the bills pile up.
These incidents have long-term effects on women's ability to maintain stable careers and achieve equality in the workforce. Half of all workers are women and 75 percent of women will become pregnant during their working lives. Women's income - before, during, and after pregnancy - is critical to their families' well-being, and the loss of that income threatens their families' financial security.
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act was passed to level the playing field and ensure that pregnant women can remain productive members of the workforce. We are hopeful that the Supreme Court will clarify that this law requires employers to provide the same accommodations to pregnant women that they provide to other injured workers.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.