SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Can 1 Million People Stop a Bad Trade Deal for Europe?
Nov 05, 2014
In July, a group of people set off to do a hard thing, but an important thing.
They wanted to collect 1 million signatures.
Once attained, those 1 million signatures would force the European Commission to discuss an immediate halt to the ongoing trade talks between the EU and U.S. These talks are known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. For short, they are called the TTIP.
Having already achieved nearly three-quarters of the signatures through the European Commission's official process -- the European Citizen's Initiative (ECI) -- we should be celebrating.
We aren't celebrating. Here's why:
On 11 September, just days before the ECI was to launch publicly by 230 organisations in 21 countries, the Commission announced that it was rejecting the ECI altogether. It claimed that the call to stop the TTIP "falls outside the framework of the Commission's powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the Union". The Commission argued that we could use an ECI to request an agreement, but we can't use an ECI to stop something we didn't ask for and don't want.
We are not waiting for permission to try to stop this very bad trade deal.
As Karl Baer on the Stop TTIP ECI steering committee aptly points out, "Democracy arises through social intervention and participation in the political process; it is not something to be granted or denied by Brussels."
So the ECI has re-formed and will carry on regardless of the Commission's disapproval. In fact, not only are we collecting signatures to halt the TTIP talks, we are appealing to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) against the Commission's rejection of the official ECI.
It's a wide-ranging mess that threatens to lower the standards that it took us generations to secure in employment and social policy, environmental protection, food safety, privacy, consumers' rights, the deregulation of public services like water and everything else swept into these secretive discussions. It controversially includes a so-called investor-state dispute settlement mechanism that would enable companies to side-step our courts if we change our laws to protect ourselves. It can't be allowed to happen.
Instead of a nice calm petition, the Commission now faces a legal challenge in the ECJ and an investigation by the European Ombudsman into transparency in the TTIP negotiations. Already an independent legal opinion issued by Professor Dr. Bernhard Kempen, University of Cologne, says that the decision to reject the ECI was wrong.
All of this lit the touchpaper of public anger over not just the TTIP but the very basis of EU trade policy.
For those keeping score:
Citizens: 1
Commission: nil
We need a new approach to trade and investment policy in the EU that puts people and genuine ecological sustainability at the very heart of discussions. To get that, we need to stop the TTIP.
Please sign our ECI now to help stop the TTIP. If there wasn't so much at stake, the Commission wouldn't be trying to stop us.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2021 Food & Water Watch
Eve Mitchell
Eve Mitchell is the Food Policy Advisor for Food & Water Europe, based in the Highlands of Scotland.
In July, a group of people set off to do a hard thing, but an important thing.
They wanted to collect 1 million signatures.
Once attained, those 1 million signatures would force the European Commission to discuss an immediate halt to the ongoing trade talks between the EU and U.S. These talks are known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. For short, they are called the TTIP.
Having already achieved nearly three-quarters of the signatures through the European Commission's official process -- the European Citizen's Initiative (ECI) -- we should be celebrating.
We aren't celebrating. Here's why:
On 11 September, just days before the ECI was to launch publicly by 230 organisations in 21 countries, the Commission announced that it was rejecting the ECI altogether. It claimed that the call to stop the TTIP "falls outside the framework of the Commission's powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the Union". The Commission argued that we could use an ECI to request an agreement, but we can't use an ECI to stop something we didn't ask for and don't want.
We are not waiting for permission to try to stop this very bad trade deal.
As Karl Baer on the Stop TTIP ECI steering committee aptly points out, "Democracy arises through social intervention and participation in the political process; it is not something to be granted or denied by Brussels."
So the ECI has re-formed and will carry on regardless of the Commission's disapproval. In fact, not only are we collecting signatures to halt the TTIP talks, we are appealing to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) against the Commission's rejection of the official ECI.
It's a wide-ranging mess that threatens to lower the standards that it took us generations to secure in employment and social policy, environmental protection, food safety, privacy, consumers' rights, the deregulation of public services like water and everything else swept into these secretive discussions. It controversially includes a so-called investor-state dispute settlement mechanism that would enable companies to side-step our courts if we change our laws to protect ourselves. It can't be allowed to happen.
Instead of a nice calm petition, the Commission now faces a legal challenge in the ECJ and an investigation by the European Ombudsman into transparency in the TTIP negotiations. Already an independent legal opinion issued by Professor Dr. Bernhard Kempen, University of Cologne, says that the decision to reject the ECI was wrong.
All of this lit the touchpaper of public anger over not just the TTIP but the very basis of EU trade policy.
For those keeping score:
Citizens: 1
Commission: nil
We need a new approach to trade and investment policy in the EU that puts people and genuine ecological sustainability at the very heart of discussions. To get that, we need to stop the TTIP.
Please sign our ECI now to help stop the TTIP. If there wasn't so much at stake, the Commission wouldn't be trying to stop us.
Eve Mitchell
Eve Mitchell is the Food Policy Advisor for Food & Water Europe, based in the Highlands of Scotland.
In July, a group of people set off to do a hard thing, but an important thing.
They wanted to collect 1 million signatures.
Once attained, those 1 million signatures would force the European Commission to discuss an immediate halt to the ongoing trade talks between the EU and U.S. These talks are known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. For short, they are called the TTIP.
Having already achieved nearly three-quarters of the signatures through the European Commission's official process -- the European Citizen's Initiative (ECI) -- we should be celebrating.
We aren't celebrating. Here's why:
On 11 September, just days before the ECI was to launch publicly by 230 organisations in 21 countries, the Commission announced that it was rejecting the ECI altogether. It claimed that the call to stop the TTIP "falls outside the framework of the Commission's powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the Union". The Commission argued that we could use an ECI to request an agreement, but we can't use an ECI to stop something we didn't ask for and don't want.
We are not waiting for permission to try to stop this very bad trade deal.
As Karl Baer on the Stop TTIP ECI steering committee aptly points out, "Democracy arises through social intervention and participation in the political process; it is not something to be granted or denied by Brussels."
So the ECI has re-formed and will carry on regardless of the Commission's disapproval. In fact, not only are we collecting signatures to halt the TTIP talks, we are appealing to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) against the Commission's rejection of the official ECI.
It's a wide-ranging mess that threatens to lower the standards that it took us generations to secure in employment and social policy, environmental protection, food safety, privacy, consumers' rights, the deregulation of public services like water and everything else swept into these secretive discussions. It controversially includes a so-called investor-state dispute settlement mechanism that would enable companies to side-step our courts if we change our laws to protect ourselves. It can't be allowed to happen.
Instead of a nice calm petition, the Commission now faces a legal challenge in the ECJ and an investigation by the European Ombudsman into transparency in the TTIP negotiations. Already an independent legal opinion issued by Professor Dr. Bernhard Kempen, University of Cologne, says that the decision to reject the ECI was wrong.
All of this lit the touchpaper of public anger over not just the TTIP but the very basis of EU trade policy.
For those keeping score:
Citizens: 1
Commission: nil
We need a new approach to trade and investment policy in the EU that puts people and genuine ecological sustainability at the very heart of discussions. To get that, we need to stop the TTIP.
Please sign our ECI now to help stop the TTIP. If there wasn't so much at stake, the Commission wouldn't be trying to stop us.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.