

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
When I heard our Congress critters are taking an extended vacation for all of August and part of September, I had two incongruous reactions: gratitude and anger.
Gratitude, because their vacation gives us a five-week break from the spectacle of right-wing mad dogs in the House yapping, foaming at the mouth, and running around in circles.
"Kill the minimum wage," they howl. "Repeal the Affordable Care Act, deport immigrant children, re-invade Iraq, impeach Obama," they go on. Yada yada yada.
Yet, nutty as they are, it's also infuriating that these pampered politicos feel entitled to so much vacation time. It's another sign of their total disconnect from the hard realities of the workaday majority they're supposed to serve.
Earth to Congress critters: Most American families are being hosed out of the middle class. They have to work harder and longer for less pay, no benefits, and they don't even get to take two weeks off, much less a five-week getaway.
In the spirit of fairness, though, I should concede that the current do-nothing House is outperforming in one category of congressional activity: junkets.
Yes, not only do our lawmakers love to vacation, but they also tiptoe around ethics rules so lobbyists can pay for their trips.
Not since the sleaze days of pay-to-play uber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff have House members taken as many cushy trips, financed by corporate interests.
Oh, excuse me. They're called "fact-finding missions," not junkets. By whatever name, lawmakers, their spouses, and staff enjoyed nearly 1,900 of those free trips last year -- paid for by private entities seeking legislative favors.
Do you know what's even more disgusting? The House Ethics Committee very quietly axed an ethics requirement this summer that lawmakers must disclose these travel freebies in their personal financial reports.
It's no wonder the public approval rating for Congress is in the ditch.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
When I heard our Congress critters are taking an extended vacation for all of August and part of September, I had two incongruous reactions: gratitude and anger.
Gratitude, because their vacation gives us a five-week break from the spectacle of right-wing mad dogs in the House yapping, foaming at the mouth, and running around in circles.
"Kill the minimum wage," they howl. "Repeal the Affordable Care Act, deport immigrant children, re-invade Iraq, impeach Obama," they go on. Yada yada yada.
Yet, nutty as they are, it's also infuriating that these pampered politicos feel entitled to so much vacation time. It's another sign of their total disconnect from the hard realities of the workaday majority they're supposed to serve.
Earth to Congress critters: Most American families are being hosed out of the middle class. They have to work harder and longer for less pay, no benefits, and they don't even get to take two weeks off, much less a five-week getaway.
In the spirit of fairness, though, I should concede that the current do-nothing House is outperforming in one category of congressional activity: junkets.
Yes, not only do our lawmakers love to vacation, but they also tiptoe around ethics rules so lobbyists can pay for their trips.
Not since the sleaze days of pay-to-play uber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff have House members taken as many cushy trips, financed by corporate interests.
Oh, excuse me. They're called "fact-finding missions," not junkets. By whatever name, lawmakers, their spouses, and staff enjoyed nearly 1,900 of those free trips last year -- paid for by private entities seeking legislative favors.
Do you know what's even more disgusting? The House Ethics Committee very quietly axed an ethics requirement this summer that lawmakers must disclose these travel freebies in their personal financial reports.
It's no wonder the public approval rating for Congress is in the ditch.
When I heard our Congress critters are taking an extended vacation for all of August and part of September, I had two incongruous reactions: gratitude and anger.
Gratitude, because their vacation gives us a five-week break from the spectacle of right-wing mad dogs in the House yapping, foaming at the mouth, and running around in circles.
"Kill the minimum wage," they howl. "Repeal the Affordable Care Act, deport immigrant children, re-invade Iraq, impeach Obama," they go on. Yada yada yada.
Yet, nutty as they are, it's also infuriating that these pampered politicos feel entitled to so much vacation time. It's another sign of their total disconnect from the hard realities of the workaday majority they're supposed to serve.
Earth to Congress critters: Most American families are being hosed out of the middle class. They have to work harder and longer for less pay, no benefits, and they don't even get to take two weeks off, much less a five-week getaway.
In the spirit of fairness, though, I should concede that the current do-nothing House is outperforming in one category of congressional activity: junkets.
Yes, not only do our lawmakers love to vacation, but they also tiptoe around ethics rules so lobbyists can pay for their trips.
Not since the sleaze days of pay-to-play uber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff have House members taken as many cushy trips, financed by corporate interests.
Oh, excuse me. They're called "fact-finding missions," not junkets. By whatever name, lawmakers, their spouses, and staff enjoyed nearly 1,900 of those free trips last year -- paid for by private entities seeking legislative favors.
Do you know what's even more disgusting? The House Ethics Committee very quietly axed an ethics requirement this summer that lawmakers must disclose these travel freebies in their personal financial reports.
It's no wonder the public approval rating for Congress is in the ditch.