'Giving It Away': Obama Caving on Social Security
President Obama is bending over way too far to reach a budget deal with John Boehner and the Republicans.
By tentatively agreeing to changing the formula for calculating the Consumer Price Index for people on Social Security, Obama has, in fact, agreed to cut the benefits of seniors.
Because the new CPI index doesn't go up as fast as the traditional measure.
President Obama is bending over way too far to reach a budget deal with John Boehner and the Republicans.

By tentatively agreeing to changing the formula for calculating the Consumer Price Index for people on Social Security, Obama has, in fact, agreed to cut the benefits of seniors.
Because the new CPI index doesn't go up as fast as the traditional measure.
As a result, every year, seniors will receive less than they otherwise would have from Social Security.
And it's not like they're getting rich on Social Security as it is. The average monthly check is $1,230 - that's less than fifteen grand a year.
And now grandma and grandpa aren't even going to be keeping up with the rate of inflation as traditionally calculated.
Forcing seniors to make do with less on Social Security is not something Obama campaigned on, and it's not something we need Democrats for.
But there were plenty of warnings.
It's not like Boehner had to beat Obama into the ground on this. The President, it seems, was always prepared to give it away.
Obama's first appointee to head the Office of Management and Budget, Peter Orszag, was in favor of this proposal.
And Obama appointed the Bowles-Simpson Commission, which lent momentum to this idea of cutting Social Security.
And Obama floated this idea of the new and reduced Consumer Price Index last summer when he tried then to get Boehner to sign on to the "grand bargain."
Bernie Sanders warned us all during the campaign that Obama was wobbly on this issue, and worried about the President's willingness to cave on the Consumer Price Index.
Sanders told Sam Stein of HuffingtonPost back in September that Obama was likely to throw seniors overboard with the so-called "chained CPI."
And that's where we are today.
It's not like Boehner had to beat Obama into the ground on this. The President, it seems, was always prepared to give it away.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
President Obama is bending over way too far to reach a budget deal with John Boehner and the Republicans.

By tentatively agreeing to changing the formula for calculating the Consumer Price Index for people on Social Security, Obama has, in fact, agreed to cut the benefits of seniors.
Because the new CPI index doesn't go up as fast as the traditional measure.
As a result, every year, seniors will receive less than they otherwise would have from Social Security.
And it's not like they're getting rich on Social Security as it is. The average monthly check is $1,230 - that's less than fifteen grand a year.
And now grandma and grandpa aren't even going to be keeping up with the rate of inflation as traditionally calculated.
Forcing seniors to make do with less on Social Security is not something Obama campaigned on, and it's not something we need Democrats for.
But there were plenty of warnings.
It's not like Boehner had to beat Obama into the ground on this. The President, it seems, was always prepared to give it away.
Obama's first appointee to head the Office of Management and Budget, Peter Orszag, was in favor of this proposal.
And Obama appointed the Bowles-Simpson Commission, which lent momentum to this idea of cutting Social Security.
And Obama floated this idea of the new and reduced Consumer Price Index last summer when he tried then to get Boehner to sign on to the "grand bargain."
Bernie Sanders warned us all during the campaign that Obama was wobbly on this issue, and worried about the President's willingness to cave on the Consumer Price Index.
Sanders told Sam Stein of HuffingtonPost back in September that Obama was likely to throw seniors overboard with the so-called "chained CPI."
And that's where we are today.
It's not like Boehner had to beat Obama into the ground on this. The President, it seems, was always prepared to give it away.
President Obama is bending over way too far to reach a budget deal with John Boehner and the Republicans.

By tentatively agreeing to changing the formula for calculating the Consumer Price Index for people on Social Security, Obama has, in fact, agreed to cut the benefits of seniors.
Because the new CPI index doesn't go up as fast as the traditional measure.
As a result, every year, seniors will receive less than they otherwise would have from Social Security.
And it's not like they're getting rich on Social Security as it is. The average monthly check is $1,230 - that's less than fifteen grand a year.
And now grandma and grandpa aren't even going to be keeping up with the rate of inflation as traditionally calculated.
Forcing seniors to make do with less on Social Security is not something Obama campaigned on, and it's not something we need Democrats for.
But there were plenty of warnings.
It's not like Boehner had to beat Obama into the ground on this. The President, it seems, was always prepared to give it away.
Obama's first appointee to head the Office of Management and Budget, Peter Orszag, was in favor of this proposal.
And Obama appointed the Bowles-Simpson Commission, which lent momentum to this idea of cutting Social Security.
And Obama floated this idea of the new and reduced Consumer Price Index last summer when he tried then to get Boehner to sign on to the "grand bargain."
Bernie Sanders warned us all during the campaign that Obama was wobbly on this issue, and worried about the President's willingness to cave on the Consumer Price Index.
Sanders told Sam Stein of HuffingtonPost back in September that Obama was likely to throw seniors overboard with the so-called "chained CPI."
And that's where we are today.
It's not like Boehner had to beat Obama into the ground on this. The President, it seems, was always prepared to give it away.

