

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
President Obama is bending over way too far to reach a budget deal with John Boehner and the Republicans.
By tentatively agreeing to changing the formula for calculating the Consumer Price Index for people on Social Security, Obama has, in fact, agreed to cut the benefits of seniors.
Because the new CPI index doesn't go up as fast as the traditional measure.
President Obama is bending over way too far to reach a budget deal with John Boehner and the Republicans.

By tentatively agreeing to changing the formula for calculating the Consumer Price Index for people on Social Security, Obama has, in fact, agreed to cut the benefits of seniors.
Because the new CPI index doesn't go up as fast as the traditional measure.
As a result, every year, seniors will receive less than they otherwise would have from Social Security.
And it's not like they're getting rich on Social Security as it is. The average monthly check is $1,230 - that's less than fifteen grand a year.
And now grandma and grandpa aren't even going to be keeping up with the rate of inflation as traditionally calculated.
Forcing seniors to make do with less on Social Security is not something Obama campaigned on, and it's not something we need Democrats for.
But there were plenty of warnings.
It's not like Boehner had to beat Obama into the ground on this. The President, it seems, was always prepared to give it away.
Obama's first appointee to head the Office of Management and Budget, Peter Orszag, was in favor of this proposal.
And Obama appointed the Bowles-Simpson Commission, which lent momentum to this idea of cutting Social Security.
And Obama floated this idea of the new and reduced Consumer Price Index last summer when he tried then to get Boehner to sign on to the "grand bargain."
Bernie Sanders warned us all during the campaign that Obama was wobbly on this issue, and worried about the President's willingness to cave on the Consumer Price Index.
Sanders told Sam Stein of HuffingtonPost back in September that Obama was likely to throw seniors overboard with the so-called "chained CPI."
And that's where we are today.
It's not like Boehner had to beat Obama into the ground on this. The President, it seems, was always prepared to give it away.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
President Obama is bending over way too far to reach a budget deal with John Boehner and the Republicans.

By tentatively agreeing to changing the formula for calculating the Consumer Price Index for people on Social Security, Obama has, in fact, agreed to cut the benefits of seniors.
Because the new CPI index doesn't go up as fast as the traditional measure.
As a result, every year, seniors will receive less than they otherwise would have from Social Security.
And it's not like they're getting rich on Social Security as it is. The average monthly check is $1,230 - that's less than fifteen grand a year.
And now grandma and grandpa aren't even going to be keeping up with the rate of inflation as traditionally calculated.
Forcing seniors to make do with less on Social Security is not something Obama campaigned on, and it's not something we need Democrats for.
But there were plenty of warnings.
It's not like Boehner had to beat Obama into the ground on this. The President, it seems, was always prepared to give it away.
Obama's first appointee to head the Office of Management and Budget, Peter Orszag, was in favor of this proposal.
And Obama appointed the Bowles-Simpson Commission, which lent momentum to this idea of cutting Social Security.
And Obama floated this idea of the new and reduced Consumer Price Index last summer when he tried then to get Boehner to sign on to the "grand bargain."
Bernie Sanders warned us all during the campaign that Obama was wobbly on this issue, and worried about the President's willingness to cave on the Consumer Price Index.
Sanders told Sam Stein of HuffingtonPost back in September that Obama was likely to throw seniors overboard with the so-called "chained CPI."
And that's where we are today.
It's not like Boehner had to beat Obama into the ground on this. The President, it seems, was always prepared to give it away.
President Obama is bending over way too far to reach a budget deal with John Boehner and the Republicans.

By tentatively agreeing to changing the formula for calculating the Consumer Price Index for people on Social Security, Obama has, in fact, agreed to cut the benefits of seniors.
Because the new CPI index doesn't go up as fast as the traditional measure.
As a result, every year, seniors will receive less than they otherwise would have from Social Security.
And it's not like they're getting rich on Social Security as it is. The average monthly check is $1,230 - that's less than fifteen grand a year.
And now grandma and grandpa aren't even going to be keeping up with the rate of inflation as traditionally calculated.
Forcing seniors to make do with less on Social Security is not something Obama campaigned on, and it's not something we need Democrats for.
But there were plenty of warnings.
It's not like Boehner had to beat Obama into the ground on this. The President, it seems, was always prepared to give it away.
Obama's first appointee to head the Office of Management and Budget, Peter Orszag, was in favor of this proposal.
And Obama appointed the Bowles-Simpson Commission, which lent momentum to this idea of cutting Social Security.
And Obama floated this idea of the new and reduced Consumer Price Index last summer when he tried then to get Boehner to sign on to the "grand bargain."
Bernie Sanders warned us all during the campaign that Obama was wobbly on this issue, and worried about the President's willingness to cave on the Consumer Price Index.
Sanders told Sam Stein of HuffingtonPost back in September that Obama was likely to throw seniors overboard with the so-called "chained CPI."
And that's where we are today.
It's not like Boehner had to beat Obama into the ground on this. The President, it seems, was always prepared to give it away.