Anti-choice Republicans are passing unconstitutional state-level abortion restrictions in an effort to force the U.S. Supreme Court to consider reversing Roe v. Wade. (Photo: Victoria Pickering/Flickr/cc)
Mar 28, 2018
On Tuesday the Kentucky legislature passed a bill--which Republican Gov. Matt Bevin is expected to sign--barring a common abortion procedure after 11 weeks of pregnancy, just the latest move by anti-choice politicians to enact unconstitutional state-level abortion regulations in hopes of forcing the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider its landmark Roe v. Wade ruling.
This attempt to restrict access to the dilation and evacuation procedure in Kentucky came just a week after a federal judge temporarily blocked a Mississippi law that banned abortion after 15 weeks, days after Idaho and Indiana enacted laws requiring doctors to report abortion complications to state health officials, and as lawmakers in Ohio are considering legislation that would totally outlaw abortion across the state, without exceptions for rape, incest, and medical emergencies.
"If this all sounds legally unsound, that's because it is," the New York Timeseditorial board wrote on Sunday. The editorial came in response to the Ohio legislation but acknowledged that "this rash of radically unconstitutional bills is appearing by design."
State-level efforts to challenge the Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortions before fetal viability are not new. As Jennifer Dalven, director of the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, pointed out on the anniversary of Roe earlier this year, "in the 45 years since the Supreme Court recognized the right to have an abortion, state and federal lawmakers have passed hundreds of restrictions eroding this right. In 2017 alone, 19 states adopted 63 new restrictions on abortion rights and access."
However, with this recent onslaught of blatantly unconstitutional laws that ultimately seek the high court's reversal on Roe, "we're entering a period where states are trying to effectively one-up each other," Elizabeth Nash, the Guttmatcher Institute's senior state issues manager, explained to The Hill. "They're jockeying for position as to which would be the state that would have their name on that case."
The states' efforts are further emboldened by the administration of President Donald Trump, who called for more federal restrictions in his January speech to participants of March for Life--where the rabidly anti-choice Vice President Mike Pence described him as "the most pro-life president in American history."
"Under the current administration, we have a new Supreme Court justice [Neil Gorsuch] who is anti-abortion, and we also have a lot of Trump nominees to the federal courts," said Heather Shumaker, senior counsel at the National Women's Law Center. "So state legislatures are feeling more emboldened to push things that are obviously unconstitutional."
"If there's any lesson to learn from [these unconstitutional laws], it's that the Republican anti-abortion strategy doesn't stop with one extreme bill," the Times concluded. "If it's up to them, they won't stop until it's impossible for many or all women in America to make their own choices about whether to access a safe, popular, and common form of healthcare."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
On Tuesday the Kentucky legislature passed a bill--which Republican Gov. Matt Bevin is expected to sign--barring a common abortion procedure after 11 weeks of pregnancy, just the latest move by anti-choice politicians to enact unconstitutional state-level abortion regulations in hopes of forcing the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider its landmark Roe v. Wade ruling.
This attempt to restrict access to the dilation and evacuation procedure in Kentucky came just a week after a federal judge temporarily blocked a Mississippi law that banned abortion after 15 weeks, days after Idaho and Indiana enacted laws requiring doctors to report abortion complications to state health officials, and as lawmakers in Ohio are considering legislation that would totally outlaw abortion across the state, without exceptions for rape, incest, and medical emergencies.
"If this all sounds legally unsound, that's because it is," the New York Timeseditorial board wrote on Sunday. The editorial came in response to the Ohio legislation but acknowledged that "this rash of radically unconstitutional bills is appearing by design."
State-level efforts to challenge the Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortions before fetal viability are not new. As Jennifer Dalven, director of the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, pointed out on the anniversary of Roe earlier this year, "in the 45 years since the Supreme Court recognized the right to have an abortion, state and federal lawmakers have passed hundreds of restrictions eroding this right. In 2017 alone, 19 states adopted 63 new restrictions on abortion rights and access."
However, with this recent onslaught of blatantly unconstitutional laws that ultimately seek the high court's reversal on Roe, "we're entering a period where states are trying to effectively one-up each other," Elizabeth Nash, the Guttmatcher Institute's senior state issues manager, explained to The Hill. "They're jockeying for position as to which would be the state that would have their name on that case."
The states' efforts are further emboldened by the administration of President Donald Trump, who called for more federal restrictions in his January speech to participants of March for Life--where the rabidly anti-choice Vice President Mike Pence described him as "the most pro-life president in American history."
"Under the current administration, we have a new Supreme Court justice [Neil Gorsuch] who is anti-abortion, and we also have a lot of Trump nominees to the federal courts," said Heather Shumaker, senior counsel at the National Women's Law Center. "So state legislatures are feeling more emboldened to push things that are obviously unconstitutional."
"If there's any lesson to learn from [these unconstitutional laws], it's that the Republican anti-abortion strategy doesn't stop with one extreme bill," the Times concluded. "If it's up to them, they won't stop until it's impossible for many or all women in America to make their own choices about whether to access a safe, popular, and common form of healthcare."
On Tuesday the Kentucky legislature passed a bill--which Republican Gov. Matt Bevin is expected to sign--barring a common abortion procedure after 11 weeks of pregnancy, just the latest move by anti-choice politicians to enact unconstitutional state-level abortion regulations in hopes of forcing the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider its landmark Roe v. Wade ruling.
This attempt to restrict access to the dilation and evacuation procedure in Kentucky came just a week after a federal judge temporarily blocked a Mississippi law that banned abortion after 15 weeks, days after Idaho and Indiana enacted laws requiring doctors to report abortion complications to state health officials, and as lawmakers in Ohio are considering legislation that would totally outlaw abortion across the state, without exceptions for rape, incest, and medical emergencies.
"If this all sounds legally unsound, that's because it is," the New York Timeseditorial board wrote on Sunday. The editorial came in response to the Ohio legislation but acknowledged that "this rash of radically unconstitutional bills is appearing by design."
State-level efforts to challenge the Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortions before fetal viability are not new. As Jennifer Dalven, director of the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, pointed out on the anniversary of Roe earlier this year, "in the 45 years since the Supreme Court recognized the right to have an abortion, state and federal lawmakers have passed hundreds of restrictions eroding this right. In 2017 alone, 19 states adopted 63 new restrictions on abortion rights and access."
However, with this recent onslaught of blatantly unconstitutional laws that ultimately seek the high court's reversal on Roe, "we're entering a period where states are trying to effectively one-up each other," Elizabeth Nash, the Guttmatcher Institute's senior state issues manager, explained to The Hill. "They're jockeying for position as to which would be the state that would have their name on that case."
The states' efforts are further emboldened by the administration of President Donald Trump, who called for more federal restrictions in his January speech to participants of March for Life--where the rabidly anti-choice Vice President Mike Pence described him as "the most pro-life president in American history."
"Under the current administration, we have a new Supreme Court justice [Neil Gorsuch] who is anti-abortion, and we also have a lot of Trump nominees to the federal courts," said Heather Shumaker, senior counsel at the National Women's Law Center. "So state legislatures are feeling more emboldened to push things that are obviously unconstitutional."
"If there's any lesson to learn from [these unconstitutional laws], it's that the Republican anti-abortion strategy doesn't stop with one extreme bill," the Times concluded. "If it's up to them, they won't stop until it's impossible for many or all women in America to make their own choices about whether to access a safe, popular, and common form of healthcare."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.