To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Gladys Francisco stands in front of her destroyed home after U.S. soldiers unloaded food and water, provided by FEMA, to residents in the neighborhood still without grid electricity or running water on Oct. 17, 2017 in San Isidro, Puerto Rico. (Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images)
While 2017 was the costliest year ever for destruction from extreme weather events--and even as much of Puerto Rico is still struggling with a slow and "dehumanizing" recovery nearly six months after Hurricane Maria--a look at the new Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) four-year strategic plan reveals there is not a single mention of "climate change" or "global warming."
The document (pdf), as Bloomberg points out, "doesn't mention climate, global warming, sea-level rise, extreme weather, or any other terminology associated with scientific predictions of rising surface temperatures and their effects." With this "dangerous" decision, FEMA's 2018-2022 strategy departs from the version developed under the Obama adminitration, which "repeatedly cited the challenges caused by a changing climate, and the need for FEMA to incorporate those risks into its long-term plans."
The new plan claims that "[l]arge scale, complex incidents, including FEMA's responses to Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria, as well as the 2017-2018 California wildfires, underscore the criticality of our shared mission and remind us of the importance of learning from past disasters" and acknowledges that "[d]isaster costs are expected to continue to increase due to rising natural hazard risk, decaying critical infrastructure, and economic pressures that limit investments in risk resilience."
However, despite the record-breaking costs of natural disasters last year, FEMA's new plan fails to mention the how global warming--largely driven by greenhouse gas emissions generated by fossil fuel use--is fueling the "rising natural hazard risk" and has exacerbated these recent disasters.
\u201cThe U.S. suffered $306 billion in damage from extreme weather last year, a record. \n\nNow FEMA's new four-year strategic plan doesn't mention "climate change." \n\nhttps://t.co/eYdCqmKPrK\u201d— Sara Peach (@Sara Peach) 1521207157
Although the exclusion of climate science from the strategy document aligns with actions of other agencies under President Donald Trump, it still provoked swift condemnation and concern:
\u201cGood grief. Wish I hadn't been kicked off of @fema's National Advisory Council. Our nation won't be ready for challenges we can't even talk about... https://t.co/9yMapfxw2e\u201d— Daniel A. Zarrilli (@Daniel A. Zarrilli) 1521160814
Rachel Cleetus, lead economist and climate policy manager at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the move "demonstrates the chilling effect the Trump administration's denialism is having on vital work of federal government agencies." Considering that FEMA's responsibilities include helping communities prepare for and respond to events like the series of intense hurricanes that struck the Caribbean and Southern U.S. last year, she added, "muzzling agencies from speaking out about climate change and preventing them from planning for its impacts is a recipe for disaster."
This is far from the first time FEMA has faced a wave of criticism since Trump took office. During the ongoing recovery effort in Puerto Rico, the agency, as Democracy Now!noted last month, "has been hit by a series of scandals, after it was revealed that only a fraction of the 30 million meals slated to be sent to the island after Hurricane Maria was actually delivered."
"FEMA approved a $156 million contract for a one-woman company to deliver the 30 million meals. But in the end, FEMA canceled the contract after she delivered only 50,000 meals, in what FEMA called a logistical nightmare," the news show reported. "This came after FEMA gave more than $30 million in contracts to a newly created Florida company which failed to deliver a single tarp to Puerto Rico."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
While 2017 was the costliest year ever for destruction from extreme weather events--and even as much of Puerto Rico is still struggling with a slow and "dehumanizing" recovery nearly six months after Hurricane Maria--a look at the new Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) four-year strategic plan reveals there is not a single mention of "climate change" or "global warming."
The document (pdf), as Bloomberg points out, "doesn't mention climate, global warming, sea-level rise, extreme weather, or any other terminology associated with scientific predictions of rising surface temperatures and their effects." With this "dangerous" decision, FEMA's 2018-2022 strategy departs from the version developed under the Obama adminitration, which "repeatedly cited the challenges caused by a changing climate, and the need for FEMA to incorporate those risks into its long-term plans."
The new plan claims that "[l]arge scale, complex incidents, including FEMA's responses to Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria, as well as the 2017-2018 California wildfires, underscore the criticality of our shared mission and remind us of the importance of learning from past disasters" and acknowledges that "[d]isaster costs are expected to continue to increase due to rising natural hazard risk, decaying critical infrastructure, and economic pressures that limit investments in risk resilience."
However, despite the record-breaking costs of natural disasters last year, FEMA's new plan fails to mention the how global warming--largely driven by greenhouse gas emissions generated by fossil fuel use--is fueling the "rising natural hazard risk" and has exacerbated these recent disasters.
\u201cThe U.S. suffered $306 billion in damage from extreme weather last year, a record. \n\nNow FEMA's new four-year strategic plan doesn't mention "climate change." \n\nhttps://t.co/eYdCqmKPrK\u201d— Sara Peach (@Sara Peach) 1521207157
Although the exclusion of climate science from the strategy document aligns with actions of other agencies under President Donald Trump, it still provoked swift condemnation and concern:
\u201cGood grief. Wish I hadn't been kicked off of @fema's National Advisory Council. Our nation won't be ready for challenges we can't even talk about... https://t.co/9yMapfxw2e\u201d— Daniel A. Zarrilli (@Daniel A. Zarrilli) 1521160814
Rachel Cleetus, lead economist and climate policy manager at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the move "demonstrates the chilling effect the Trump administration's denialism is having on vital work of federal government agencies." Considering that FEMA's responsibilities include helping communities prepare for and respond to events like the series of intense hurricanes that struck the Caribbean and Southern U.S. last year, she added, "muzzling agencies from speaking out about climate change and preventing them from planning for its impacts is a recipe for disaster."
This is far from the first time FEMA has faced a wave of criticism since Trump took office. During the ongoing recovery effort in Puerto Rico, the agency, as Democracy Now!noted last month, "has been hit by a series of scandals, after it was revealed that only a fraction of the 30 million meals slated to be sent to the island after Hurricane Maria was actually delivered."
"FEMA approved a $156 million contract for a one-woman company to deliver the 30 million meals. But in the end, FEMA canceled the contract after she delivered only 50,000 meals, in what FEMA called a logistical nightmare," the news show reported. "This came after FEMA gave more than $30 million in contracts to a newly created Florida company which failed to deliver a single tarp to Puerto Rico."
While 2017 was the costliest year ever for destruction from extreme weather events--and even as much of Puerto Rico is still struggling with a slow and "dehumanizing" recovery nearly six months after Hurricane Maria--a look at the new Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) four-year strategic plan reveals there is not a single mention of "climate change" or "global warming."
The document (pdf), as Bloomberg points out, "doesn't mention climate, global warming, sea-level rise, extreme weather, or any other terminology associated with scientific predictions of rising surface temperatures and their effects." With this "dangerous" decision, FEMA's 2018-2022 strategy departs from the version developed under the Obama adminitration, which "repeatedly cited the challenges caused by a changing climate, and the need for FEMA to incorporate those risks into its long-term plans."
The new plan claims that "[l]arge scale, complex incidents, including FEMA's responses to Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria, as well as the 2017-2018 California wildfires, underscore the criticality of our shared mission and remind us of the importance of learning from past disasters" and acknowledges that "[d]isaster costs are expected to continue to increase due to rising natural hazard risk, decaying critical infrastructure, and economic pressures that limit investments in risk resilience."
However, despite the record-breaking costs of natural disasters last year, FEMA's new plan fails to mention the how global warming--largely driven by greenhouse gas emissions generated by fossil fuel use--is fueling the "rising natural hazard risk" and has exacerbated these recent disasters.
\u201cThe U.S. suffered $306 billion in damage from extreme weather last year, a record. \n\nNow FEMA's new four-year strategic plan doesn't mention "climate change." \n\nhttps://t.co/eYdCqmKPrK\u201d— Sara Peach (@Sara Peach) 1521207157
Although the exclusion of climate science from the strategy document aligns with actions of other agencies under President Donald Trump, it still provoked swift condemnation and concern:
\u201cGood grief. Wish I hadn't been kicked off of @fema's National Advisory Council. Our nation won't be ready for challenges we can't even talk about... https://t.co/9yMapfxw2e\u201d— Daniel A. Zarrilli (@Daniel A. Zarrilli) 1521160814
Rachel Cleetus, lead economist and climate policy manager at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the move "demonstrates the chilling effect the Trump administration's denialism is having on vital work of federal government agencies." Considering that FEMA's responsibilities include helping communities prepare for and respond to events like the series of intense hurricanes that struck the Caribbean and Southern U.S. last year, she added, "muzzling agencies from speaking out about climate change and preventing them from planning for its impacts is a recipe for disaster."
This is far from the first time FEMA has faced a wave of criticism since Trump took office. During the ongoing recovery effort in Puerto Rico, the agency, as Democracy Now!noted last month, "has been hit by a series of scandals, after it was revealed that only a fraction of the 30 million meals slated to be sent to the island after Hurricane Maria was actually delivered."
"FEMA approved a $156 million contract for a one-woman company to deliver the 30 million meals. But in the end, FEMA canceled the contract after she delivered only 50,000 meals, in what FEMA called a logistical nightmare," the news show reported. "This came after FEMA gave more than $30 million in contracts to a newly created Florida company which failed to deliver a single tarp to Puerto Rico."
