SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A new bipartisan Senate bill would make it illegal for U.S. citizens to support international boycotts of Israel and Israeli settlements. (Photo: Takver/Flickr/cc)
Condemnation Grows for Bipartisan Attack on Free Speech Rights of BDS Supporters
Lawmakers urged to reject bill that would punish Americans for supporting boycotts of Israel
Jul 20, 2017
A pair of bipartisan bills targeting boycotts of Israel and Israeli settlements appear to have widespread support in Congress, to the dismay of civil rights advocates who say the proposals are an attack on free speech.
The Israeli Anti-Boycott Act targets the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS) movement aimed at ending Israel's occupation of the West Bank through a refusal to economically support the country. The law would specifically ban support by any U.S. citizen for international boycott efforts against Israel.
The law would make supporting such boycotts punishable by a fine of at least $250,000, with a maximum punishment of 20 years in prison and a fine of $1 million.
How can one credibly inveigh against 'authoritarianism' while sponsoring a bill that dictates to American citizens what political views they are and are not allowed to espouse under threat of criminal prosecution?--Glenn Greenwald and Ryan Grim, The Intercept
Despite the clear breach of the First Amendment that the bills represent, 42 senators and 234 representatives from both sides of the aisle have signed on as co-sponsors.
MoveOn.org tweeted about the bill's bipartisan support on Wednesday, urging lawmakers to stand up for the free speech rights of all Americans, regardless of whether their views align with the official U.S. stance on Israel.
The American Civil Liberties Union sent a letter to senators on Monday, urging them to reject the bill and noting that Americans are and should remain free to offer or withhold economic support to whatever entity they choose, for whatever reasons they see fit. The ACLU wrote:
"There are millions of businesses and individuals who do no business with Israel, or with companies doing business there, for a number of reasons...Under the bill, however, only a person whose lack of business ties to Israel is politically motivated would be subject to fines and imprisonment - even though there are many others who engage in the very same behavior."
At The Intercept, Glenn Greenwald and Ryan Grim noted that strong bipartisan support calls into question the claimed commitment to democratic ideals of many of bills' co-sponsors.
"It is hard to put into words the irony of watching many of the most celebrated and beloved congressional leaders of the anti-authoritarian Resistance -- Gillibrand, Schiff, Swalwell, and Lieu -- sponsor one of the most oppressive and authoritarian bills to appear in Congress in many years," Greenwald and Grim write. "How can one credibly inveigh against 'authoritarianism' while sponsoring a bill that dictates to American citizens what political views they are and are not allowed to espouse under threat of criminal prosecution?"
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A pair of bipartisan bills targeting boycotts of Israel and Israeli settlements appear to have widespread support in Congress, to the dismay of civil rights advocates who say the proposals are an attack on free speech.
The Israeli Anti-Boycott Act targets the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS) movement aimed at ending Israel's occupation of the West Bank through a refusal to economically support the country. The law would specifically ban support by any U.S. citizen for international boycott efforts against Israel.
The law would make supporting such boycotts punishable by a fine of at least $250,000, with a maximum punishment of 20 years in prison and a fine of $1 million.
How can one credibly inveigh against 'authoritarianism' while sponsoring a bill that dictates to American citizens what political views they are and are not allowed to espouse under threat of criminal prosecution?--Glenn Greenwald and Ryan Grim, The Intercept
Despite the clear breach of the First Amendment that the bills represent, 42 senators and 234 representatives from both sides of the aisle have signed on as co-sponsors.
MoveOn.org tweeted about the bill's bipartisan support on Wednesday, urging lawmakers to stand up for the free speech rights of all Americans, regardless of whether their views align with the official U.S. stance on Israel.
The American Civil Liberties Union sent a letter to senators on Monday, urging them to reject the bill and noting that Americans are and should remain free to offer or withhold economic support to whatever entity they choose, for whatever reasons they see fit. The ACLU wrote:
"There are millions of businesses and individuals who do no business with Israel, or with companies doing business there, for a number of reasons...Under the bill, however, only a person whose lack of business ties to Israel is politically motivated would be subject to fines and imprisonment - even though there are many others who engage in the very same behavior."
At The Intercept, Glenn Greenwald and Ryan Grim noted that strong bipartisan support calls into question the claimed commitment to democratic ideals of many of bills' co-sponsors.
"It is hard to put into words the irony of watching many of the most celebrated and beloved congressional leaders of the anti-authoritarian Resistance -- Gillibrand, Schiff, Swalwell, and Lieu -- sponsor one of the most oppressive and authoritarian bills to appear in Congress in many years," Greenwald and Grim write. "How can one credibly inveigh against 'authoritarianism' while sponsoring a bill that dictates to American citizens what political views they are and are not allowed to espouse under threat of criminal prosecution?"
A pair of bipartisan bills targeting boycotts of Israel and Israeli settlements appear to have widespread support in Congress, to the dismay of civil rights advocates who say the proposals are an attack on free speech.
The Israeli Anti-Boycott Act targets the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS) movement aimed at ending Israel's occupation of the West Bank through a refusal to economically support the country. The law would specifically ban support by any U.S. citizen for international boycott efforts against Israel.
The law would make supporting such boycotts punishable by a fine of at least $250,000, with a maximum punishment of 20 years in prison and a fine of $1 million.
How can one credibly inveigh against 'authoritarianism' while sponsoring a bill that dictates to American citizens what political views they are and are not allowed to espouse under threat of criminal prosecution?--Glenn Greenwald and Ryan Grim, The Intercept
Despite the clear breach of the First Amendment that the bills represent, 42 senators and 234 representatives from both sides of the aisle have signed on as co-sponsors.
MoveOn.org tweeted about the bill's bipartisan support on Wednesday, urging lawmakers to stand up for the free speech rights of all Americans, regardless of whether their views align with the official U.S. stance on Israel.
The American Civil Liberties Union sent a letter to senators on Monday, urging them to reject the bill and noting that Americans are and should remain free to offer or withhold economic support to whatever entity they choose, for whatever reasons they see fit. The ACLU wrote:
"There are millions of businesses and individuals who do no business with Israel, or with companies doing business there, for a number of reasons...Under the bill, however, only a person whose lack of business ties to Israel is politically motivated would be subject to fines and imprisonment - even though there are many others who engage in the very same behavior."
At The Intercept, Glenn Greenwald and Ryan Grim noted that strong bipartisan support calls into question the claimed commitment to democratic ideals of many of bills' co-sponsors.
"It is hard to put into words the irony of watching many of the most celebrated and beloved congressional leaders of the anti-authoritarian Resistance -- Gillibrand, Schiff, Swalwell, and Lieu -- sponsor one of the most oppressive and authoritarian bills to appear in Congress in many years," Greenwald and Grim write. "How can one credibly inveigh against 'authoritarianism' while sponsoring a bill that dictates to American citizens what political views they are and are not allowed to espouse under threat of criminal prosecution?"
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.