To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×
'Lunacy': Trump Aides Sought Afghanistan Advice From Notorious War Profiteers

The Trump administration's recruitment of Prince and Feinberg "raises a host of ethical issues, not least that both men could profit from their recommendations," the New York Times notes. (Photo: Miller Center/Flickr/cc)

'Lunacy': Trump Aides Sought Afghanistan Advice From Notorious War Profiteers

Blackwater founder Erik Prince and billionaire Stephen Feinberg reportedly "recruited" for war planning

Two of President Donald Trump's closest aides have reportedly solicited advice from two wealthy private military contractors--Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater, and Stephen Feinberg, the billionaire owner of DynCorp International--on how to proceed with the sixteen-year-long war in Afghanistan.

"That Erik 'Wage Holy War For Profit' Prince is talking to cabinet members should but probably won't be a huge story."
--Kate Aronoff, In These Times

According to the New York Times, White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and senior advisor Jared Kushner "recruited" the contractors, who have made a hefty sum from perpetual conflict in the Middle East, "to devise alternatives to the Pentagon's plan to send thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan."

Following a meeting with Bannon and Kushner, Prince and Feinberg have "developed proposals to rely on contractors instead of American troops in Afghanistan," the Times notes.

"The highly unusual meeting dramatizes the divide between Mr. Trump's generals and his political staff over Afghanistan, the lengths to which his aides will go to give their boss more options for dealing with it and the readiness of this White House to turn to business people for help with diplomatic and military problems," the Times reports. "But it also raises a host of ethical issues, not least that both men could profit from their recommendations."

As Common Dreams reported last month, Prince penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal in which he recommended a "viceroy approach" in Afghanistan that would rely heavily on private security forces.

Critics characterized Prince's proposals as tantamount to "colonialism" and argued they exude "sheer 19th century bloodlust and thirst for empire."

Following the Times reporting on Monday, commentators denounced the attempt to give credence to the ideas of war profiteers as "lunacy."

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world


Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
afghanistanblackwaterjared kushnersteve bannontrumpism

Two of President Donald Trump's closest aides have reportedly solicited advice from two wealthy private military contractors--Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater, and Stephen Feinberg, the billionaire owner of DynCorp International--on how to proceed with the sixteen-year-long war in Afghanistan.

"That Erik 'Wage Holy War For Profit' Prince is talking to cabinet members should but probably won't be a huge story."
--Kate Aronoff, In These Times

According to the New York Times, White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and senior advisor Jared Kushner "recruited" the contractors, who have made a hefty sum from perpetual conflict in the Middle East, "to devise alternatives to the Pentagon's plan to send thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan."

Following a meeting with Bannon and Kushner, Prince and Feinberg have "developed proposals to rely on contractors instead of American troops in Afghanistan," the Times notes.

"The highly unusual meeting dramatizes the divide between Mr. Trump's generals and his political staff over Afghanistan, the lengths to which his aides will go to give their boss more options for dealing with it and the readiness of this White House to turn to business people for help with diplomatic and military problems," the Times reports. "But it also raises a host of ethical issues, not least that both men could profit from their recommendations."

As Common Dreams reported last month, Prince penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal in which he recommended a "viceroy approach" in Afghanistan that would rely heavily on private security forces.

Critics characterized Prince's proposals as tantamount to "colonialism" and argued they exude "sheer 19th century bloodlust and thirst for empire."

Following the Times reporting on Monday, commentators denounced the attempt to give credence to the ideas of war profiteers as "lunacy."

Two of President Donald Trump's closest aides have reportedly solicited advice from two wealthy private military contractors--Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater, and Stephen Feinberg, the billionaire owner of DynCorp International--on how to proceed with the sixteen-year-long war in Afghanistan.

"That Erik 'Wage Holy War For Profit' Prince is talking to cabinet members should but probably won't be a huge story."
--Kate Aronoff, In These Times

According to the New York Times, White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and senior advisor Jared Kushner "recruited" the contractors, who have made a hefty sum from perpetual conflict in the Middle East, "to devise alternatives to the Pentagon's plan to send thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan."

Following a meeting with Bannon and Kushner, Prince and Feinberg have "developed proposals to rely on contractors instead of American troops in Afghanistan," the Times notes.

"The highly unusual meeting dramatizes the divide between Mr. Trump's generals and his political staff over Afghanistan, the lengths to which his aides will go to give their boss more options for dealing with it and the readiness of this White House to turn to business people for help with diplomatic and military problems," the Times reports. "But it also raises a host of ethical issues, not least that both men could profit from their recommendations."

As Common Dreams reported last month, Prince penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal in which he recommended a "viceroy approach" in Afghanistan that would rely heavily on private security forces.

Critics characterized Prince's proposals as tantamount to "colonialism" and argued they exude "sheer 19th century bloodlust and thirst for empire."

Following the Times reporting on Monday, commentators denounced the attempt to give credence to the ideas of war profiteers as "lunacy."

afghanistanblackwaterjared kushnersteve bannontrumpism