SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Trump Inauguration Bankrolled by Firms Seeking Government Favor
In one notable instance, agrochem giant Dow—which is trying to kill a risk study on its pesticides—gave $1 million for festivities
Apr 20, 2017
Companies seeking favor from the government wrote big checks for President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings (pdf) released this week.
In one notable instance, the agrochemical giant Dow--which is trying to kill a federal risk study on its pesticides--gave $1 million for the festivities. Dow's chairman and CEO Andrew Liveris is a close adviser to Trump and heads a White House manufacturing working group.
Last week, lawyers representing Dow and two other big chemical companies sent letters to the chiefs of three federal agencies asking them to ignore scientific findings that their pesticides cause damage to roughly 1,800 threatened or endangered species, the Associated Press reported Thursday.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that chlorpyrifos, diazinon, and malathion are "likely to adversely affect" 1,778 of the 1,835 animals and plants the agency examined, including endangered mammals, birds, and reptiles.
Dow claimed the tests had been conducted unreliably and asked the heads of the EPA, the Natural Marine Fisheries Service, and the Fish and Wildlife Service to "set aside" the scientific findings. (In March, EPA chief Scott Pruitt announced that he would lift a federal ban on chlorpyrifos, which is also known to cause brain damage in children.)
Green groups were not surprised that Dow was attempting to cast doubt on the results. Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, told the AP that the company was intentionally holding scientists to impossible standards.
"You can't just take an endangered fish out of the wild, take it to the lab, and then expose it to enough pesticides until it dies to get that sort of data," Hartl said. "It's wrong morally, and it's illegal."
Other companies shelling out for the inauguration were AT&T, which gave $2.1 million as it awaits federal approval of its proposed merger with Time Warner--a deal that opponents have slammed as "counter to the public good" and a threat to privacy. In March, Trump tapped Makan Delrahim, who once said the merger was no big deal, to serve as antitrust chief for the Department of Justice.
The telecommunications giant Qualcomm, which is fighting an Obama-era anti-competitiveness complaint, gave $1 million.
Defense contractor Boeing gave $1 million.
Sheldon Adelson, the reclusive casino mogul and conservative super-donor, gave $5 million.
In all, Politico noted, "more than 40 individuals and corporations each gave at least $1 million toward Trump's inauguration festivities, including Bank of America, Pfizer and Qualcomm, top executives from Cantor Fitzgerald and GoDaddy, and the owners of the National Football League's Houston Texans, Jacksonville Jaguars, Los Angeles Rams, New England Patriots, New York Jets, and Washington Redskins."
Robert Weissman, president of the watchdog group Public Citizen, said Wednesday, "The Trump administration did not wait to take office before embracing and deepening the pay-to-play, corrupting culture against which candidate Trump ran. Those who did attend the inauguration did so out of civic pride and a celebration of American democracy. For inaugural donors, it was all about buying access and influence, and corrupting American democracy."
"If only all that money had bought a bigger crowd," Weissman said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Companies seeking favor from the government wrote big checks for President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings (pdf) released this week.
In one notable instance, the agrochemical giant Dow--which is trying to kill a federal risk study on its pesticides--gave $1 million for the festivities. Dow's chairman and CEO Andrew Liveris is a close adviser to Trump and heads a White House manufacturing working group.
Last week, lawyers representing Dow and two other big chemical companies sent letters to the chiefs of three federal agencies asking them to ignore scientific findings that their pesticides cause damage to roughly 1,800 threatened or endangered species, the Associated Press reported Thursday.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that chlorpyrifos, diazinon, and malathion are "likely to adversely affect" 1,778 of the 1,835 animals and plants the agency examined, including endangered mammals, birds, and reptiles.
Dow claimed the tests had been conducted unreliably and asked the heads of the EPA, the Natural Marine Fisheries Service, and the Fish and Wildlife Service to "set aside" the scientific findings. (In March, EPA chief Scott Pruitt announced that he would lift a federal ban on chlorpyrifos, which is also known to cause brain damage in children.)
Green groups were not surprised that Dow was attempting to cast doubt on the results. Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, told the AP that the company was intentionally holding scientists to impossible standards.
"You can't just take an endangered fish out of the wild, take it to the lab, and then expose it to enough pesticides until it dies to get that sort of data," Hartl said. "It's wrong morally, and it's illegal."
Other companies shelling out for the inauguration were AT&T, which gave $2.1 million as it awaits federal approval of its proposed merger with Time Warner--a deal that opponents have slammed as "counter to the public good" and a threat to privacy. In March, Trump tapped Makan Delrahim, who once said the merger was no big deal, to serve as antitrust chief for the Department of Justice.
The telecommunications giant Qualcomm, which is fighting an Obama-era anti-competitiveness complaint, gave $1 million.
Defense contractor Boeing gave $1 million.
Sheldon Adelson, the reclusive casino mogul and conservative super-donor, gave $5 million.
In all, Politico noted, "more than 40 individuals and corporations each gave at least $1 million toward Trump's inauguration festivities, including Bank of America, Pfizer and Qualcomm, top executives from Cantor Fitzgerald and GoDaddy, and the owners of the National Football League's Houston Texans, Jacksonville Jaguars, Los Angeles Rams, New England Patriots, New York Jets, and Washington Redskins."
Robert Weissman, president of the watchdog group Public Citizen, said Wednesday, "The Trump administration did not wait to take office before embracing and deepening the pay-to-play, corrupting culture against which candidate Trump ran. Those who did attend the inauguration did so out of civic pride and a celebration of American democracy. For inaugural donors, it was all about buying access and influence, and corrupting American democracy."
"If only all that money had bought a bigger crowd," Weissman said.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Companies seeking favor from the government wrote big checks for President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings (pdf) released this week.
In one notable instance, the agrochemical giant Dow--which is trying to kill a federal risk study on its pesticides--gave $1 million for the festivities. Dow's chairman and CEO Andrew Liveris is a close adviser to Trump and heads a White House manufacturing working group.
Last week, lawyers representing Dow and two other big chemical companies sent letters to the chiefs of three federal agencies asking them to ignore scientific findings that their pesticides cause damage to roughly 1,800 threatened or endangered species, the Associated Press reported Thursday.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that chlorpyrifos, diazinon, and malathion are "likely to adversely affect" 1,778 of the 1,835 animals and plants the agency examined, including endangered mammals, birds, and reptiles.
Dow claimed the tests had been conducted unreliably and asked the heads of the EPA, the Natural Marine Fisheries Service, and the Fish and Wildlife Service to "set aside" the scientific findings. (In March, EPA chief Scott Pruitt announced that he would lift a federal ban on chlorpyrifos, which is also known to cause brain damage in children.)
Green groups were not surprised that Dow was attempting to cast doubt on the results. Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, told the AP that the company was intentionally holding scientists to impossible standards.
"You can't just take an endangered fish out of the wild, take it to the lab, and then expose it to enough pesticides until it dies to get that sort of data," Hartl said. "It's wrong morally, and it's illegal."
Other companies shelling out for the inauguration were AT&T, which gave $2.1 million as it awaits federal approval of its proposed merger with Time Warner--a deal that opponents have slammed as "counter to the public good" and a threat to privacy. In March, Trump tapped Makan Delrahim, who once said the merger was no big deal, to serve as antitrust chief for the Department of Justice.
The telecommunications giant Qualcomm, which is fighting an Obama-era anti-competitiveness complaint, gave $1 million.
Defense contractor Boeing gave $1 million.
Sheldon Adelson, the reclusive casino mogul and conservative super-donor, gave $5 million.
In all, Politico noted, "more than 40 individuals and corporations each gave at least $1 million toward Trump's inauguration festivities, including Bank of America, Pfizer and Qualcomm, top executives from Cantor Fitzgerald and GoDaddy, and the owners of the National Football League's Houston Texans, Jacksonville Jaguars, Los Angeles Rams, New England Patriots, New York Jets, and Washington Redskins."
Robert Weissman, president of the watchdog group Public Citizen, said Wednesday, "The Trump administration did not wait to take office before embracing and deepening the pay-to-play, corrupting culture against which candidate Trump ran. Those who did attend the inauguration did so out of civic pride and a celebration of American democracy. For inaugural donors, it was all about buying access and influence, and corrupting American democracy."
"If only all that money had bought a bigger crowd," Weissman said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.