SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Border Agents Using 'Sledgehammer' Tactics as New Travel Ban Nears
Agents are reportedly detaining and threatening to deport travelers on little basis, a worrying trend as Trump readies 'Muslim Ban 2.0'
Mar 01, 2017
Civil rights groups are criticizing border agents' "sledgehammer approach" to vetting international travelers at airports around the country, a troubling trend as President Donald Trump prepares to sign his new ban on immigrants and refugees.
Agents are reportedly detaining and threatening to deport travelers, questioning them about their religions, and demanding access to their phones and social media platforms, often targeting those with non-Western names or in certain professions--including Muhammad Ali's American-born son and a French Holocaust historian.
"Customs and Border Patrol [CBP] agents are feeling more emboldened by the signal being sent from the White House," Jay Holland, a civil rights attorney, told The Hill. "We are seeing a real difference here in terms of the aggressiveness and in terms of the implementation of enforcement efforts, no doubt about it."
"It's basically a sledgehammer approach," he said.
The issue is particularly worrying as the White House is expected to unveil a new executive order on immigration that the administration has promised will be "tailored" to survive a court battle, unlike Trump's previous memorandum, which was suspended just days after its implementation in January.
Insiders say the new order lifts the freeze on allowing travelers from Iraq, one of the countries included on the list of seven majority-Muslim nations from the first memo. It is also only likely to target new visa applicants, while the original affected existing visa-holders as well.
The new order was expected to come as early as Wednesday, but White House officials reportedly scrapped the signage amid positive reviews of Trump's first address to a joint session of Congress. Still, that speech included the announcement of a new federal office to support "American victims" of crimes committed by undocumented immigrants, giving little reassurance that the president's stance on immigration had softened.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said in an email to supporters that it was ready to take on what they called the "Muslim Ban 2.0."
"No matter how he seeks to disguise the true intent of the new order," wrote the group's executive director Anthony D. Romero, "we are prepared to come to the immediate defense of any people whose rights it puts in jeopardy. "
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Civil rights groups are criticizing border agents' "sledgehammer approach" to vetting international travelers at airports around the country, a troubling trend as President Donald Trump prepares to sign his new ban on immigrants and refugees.
Agents are reportedly detaining and threatening to deport travelers, questioning them about their religions, and demanding access to their phones and social media platforms, often targeting those with non-Western names or in certain professions--including Muhammad Ali's American-born son and a French Holocaust historian.
"Customs and Border Patrol [CBP] agents are feeling more emboldened by the signal being sent from the White House," Jay Holland, a civil rights attorney, told The Hill. "We are seeing a real difference here in terms of the aggressiveness and in terms of the implementation of enforcement efforts, no doubt about it."
"It's basically a sledgehammer approach," he said.
The issue is particularly worrying as the White House is expected to unveil a new executive order on immigration that the administration has promised will be "tailored" to survive a court battle, unlike Trump's previous memorandum, which was suspended just days after its implementation in January.
Insiders say the new order lifts the freeze on allowing travelers from Iraq, one of the countries included on the list of seven majority-Muslim nations from the first memo. It is also only likely to target new visa applicants, while the original affected existing visa-holders as well.
The new order was expected to come as early as Wednesday, but White House officials reportedly scrapped the signage amid positive reviews of Trump's first address to a joint session of Congress. Still, that speech included the announcement of a new federal office to support "American victims" of crimes committed by undocumented immigrants, giving little reassurance that the president's stance on immigration had softened.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said in an email to supporters that it was ready to take on what they called the "Muslim Ban 2.0."
"No matter how he seeks to disguise the true intent of the new order," wrote the group's executive director Anthony D. Romero, "we are prepared to come to the immediate defense of any people whose rights it puts in jeopardy. "
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Civil rights groups are criticizing border agents' "sledgehammer approach" to vetting international travelers at airports around the country, a troubling trend as President Donald Trump prepares to sign his new ban on immigrants and refugees.
Agents are reportedly detaining and threatening to deport travelers, questioning them about their religions, and demanding access to their phones and social media platforms, often targeting those with non-Western names or in certain professions--including Muhammad Ali's American-born son and a French Holocaust historian.
"Customs and Border Patrol [CBP] agents are feeling more emboldened by the signal being sent from the White House," Jay Holland, a civil rights attorney, told The Hill. "We are seeing a real difference here in terms of the aggressiveness and in terms of the implementation of enforcement efforts, no doubt about it."
"It's basically a sledgehammer approach," he said.
The issue is particularly worrying as the White House is expected to unveil a new executive order on immigration that the administration has promised will be "tailored" to survive a court battle, unlike Trump's previous memorandum, which was suspended just days after its implementation in January.
Insiders say the new order lifts the freeze on allowing travelers from Iraq, one of the countries included on the list of seven majority-Muslim nations from the first memo. It is also only likely to target new visa applicants, while the original affected existing visa-holders as well.
The new order was expected to come as early as Wednesday, but White House officials reportedly scrapped the signage amid positive reviews of Trump's first address to a joint session of Congress. Still, that speech included the announcement of a new federal office to support "American victims" of crimes committed by undocumented immigrants, giving little reassurance that the president's stance on immigration had softened.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said in an email to supporters that it was ready to take on what they called the "Muslim Ban 2.0."
"No matter how he seeks to disguise the true intent of the new order," wrote the group's executive director Anthony D. Romero, "we are prepared to come to the immediate defense of any people whose rights it puts in jeopardy. "
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.