SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Obama Signed Into Law Controversial GMO Labeling Bill. Now What?
'Passage of this bill leaves consumers with no other recourse but to boycott any brand or product that is not labeled either USDA organic, 100-percent grass-fed, or non-GMO'
Aug 01, 2016
What's an advocate of clear GMO labeling to do now that President Barack Obama has signed into law the food industry-supported measure dubbed the DARK Act?
One option, according to the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), is to join roughly half a million people who've said they will boycott brands that won't label their products--in a clear way for everyone to see--that have been produced with genetic engineering.
When Obama on Friday signed the measure "paid for and written by corporations who clearly have something to hide," said Ronnie Cummins, international director of OCA, the president "succumbed to industry pressure to betray the 90 percent of Americans who want GMOs labeled."
Congress passed the measure, which supercedes Vermont's historic labeling law, last month, and now, as the Associated Press reports, the "Agriculture Department has two years to write the rules."
Here's where the controversy lies: While called a GMO labeling bill--and though the White House says it "will provide new opportunities for consumers to have access to information about their food"--the organization Just Label It says it "falls short of what consumers rightly expect--a simple at-a-glance GMO disclosure on the package," and "contains loopholes that could limit the number of products that must carry a GMO disclosure."
In fact, says the Center for Food Safety, which opposed the measure, it's discriminatory, as it "allows companies and producers to use QR codes, 1-800 numbers, and other difficult-to-access technology."
Noting the impact of using QR electronic barcodes, OCA's Cummins says that "more than a third of Americans can't even read [them] because they don't have smart phones or reliable internet service." As such, he says, it "allows corporations to hide information about GMOs."
"Passage of this bill leaves consumers with no other recourse but to boycott any brand or product that is not labeled either USDA organic, 100-percent grass-fed, or non-GMO. Consumers who want to boycott those brands that have fought to keep labels off of their products, or any brands that refuse to label, can join the nearly half a million consumers who have already downloaded our boycott app," Cummins added in his press statement.
OCA is also calling on consumers to support the so-called Monsanto Tribunal, a two-day event that will take place in The Hague in October in which a panel of international judges will hear will hear testimony from citizens across the globe who feel they've been harmed by the company's products. A binding decision will not be produced by the tribunal; rather, the judges will issue opinions on six questions, including whether Monsanto violated the right to a healthy environment and the right to food.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
What's an advocate of clear GMO labeling to do now that President Barack Obama has signed into law the food industry-supported measure dubbed the DARK Act?
One option, according to the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), is to join roughly half a million people who've said they will boycott brands that won't label their products--in a clear way for everyone to see--that have been produced with genetic engineering.
When Obama on Friday signed the measure "paid for and written by corporations who clearly have something to hide," said Ronnie Cummins, international director of OCA, the president "succumbed to industry pressure to betray the 90 percent of Americans who want GMOs labeled."
Congress passed the measure, which supercedes Vermont's historic labeling law, last month, and now, as the Associated Press reports, the "Agriculture Department has two years to write the rules."
Here's where the controversy lies: While called a GMO labeling bill--and though the White House says it "will provide new opportunities for consumers to have access to information about their food"--the organization Just Label It says it "falls short of what consumers rightly expect--a simple at-a-glance GMO disclosure on the package," and "contains loopholes that could limit the number of products that must carry a GMO disclosure."
In fact, says the Center for Food Safety, which opposed the measure, it's discriminatory, as it "allows companies and producers to use QR codes, 1-800 numbers, and other difficult-to-access technology."
Noting the impact of using QR electronic barcodes, OCA's Cummins says that "more than a third of Americans can't even read [them] because they don't have smart phones or reliable internet service." As such, he says, it "allows corporations to hide information about GMOs."
"Passage of this bill leaves consumers with no other recourse but to boycott any brand or product that is not labeled either USDA organic, 100-percent grass-fed, or non-GMO. Consumers who want to boycott those brands that have fought to keep labels off of their products, or any brands that refuse to label, can join the nearly half a million consumers who have already downloaded our boycott app," Cummins added in his press statement.
OCA is also calling on consumers to support the so-called Monsanto Tribunal, a two-day event that will take place in The Hague in October in which a panel of international judges will hear will hear testimony from citizens across the globe who feel they've been harmed by the company's products. A binding decision will not be produced by the tribunal; rather, the judges will issue opinions on six questions, including whether Monsanto violated the right to a healthy environment and the right to food.
What's an advocate of clear GMO labeling to do now that President Barack Obama has signed into law the food industry-supported measure dubbed the DARK Act?
One option, according to the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), is to join roughly half a million people who've said they will boycott brands that won't label their products--in a clear way for everyone to see--that have been produced with genetic engineering.
When Obama on Friday signed the measure "paid for and written by corporations who clearly have something to hide," said Ronnie Cummins, international director of OCA, the president "succumbed to industry pressure to betray the 90 percent of Americans who want GMOs labeled."
Congress passed the measure, which supercedes Vermont's historic labeling law, last month, and now, as the Associated Press reports, the "Agriculture Department has two years to write the rules."
Here's where the controversy lies: While called a GMO labeling bill--and though the White House says it "will provide new opportunities for consumers to have access to information about their food"--the organization Just Label It says it "falls short of what consumers rightly expect--a simple at-a-glance GMO disclosure on the package," and "contains loopholes that could limit the number of products that must carry a GMO disclosure."
In fact, says the Center for Food Safety, which opposed the measure, it's discriminatory, as it "allows companies and producers to use QR codes, 1-800 numbers, and other difficult-to-access technology."
Noting the impact of using QR electronic barcodes, OCA's Cummins says that "more than a third of Americans can't even read [them] because they don't have smart phones or reliable internet service." As such, he says, it "allows corporations to hide information about GMOs."
"Passage of this bill leaves consumers with no other recourse but to boycott any brand or product that is not labeled either USDA organic, 100-percent grass-fed, or non-GMO. Consumers who want to boycott those brands that have fought to keep labels off of their products, or any brands that refuse to label, can join the nearly half a million consumers who have already downloaded our boycott app," Cummins added in his press statement.
OCA is also calling on consumers to support the so-called Monsanto Tribunal, a two-day event that will take place in The Hague in October in which a panel of international judges will hear will hear testimony from citizens across the globe who feel they've been harmed by the company's products. A binding decision will not be produced by the tribunal; rather, the judges will issue opinions on six questions, including whether Monsanto violated the right to a healthy environment and the right to food.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.