SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
New Study Makes Clear: Saving Reefs Means Slashing Emissions
"To save coral reefs, we need to reduce our overreliance on fossil fuels.... Local management alone won't cut it."
Jul 20, 2016
Climate change is the primary cause of coral reef degradation around the world, according to a groundbreaking new study that casts doubt on the previous scientific understanding of reef erosion.
The research, published Wednesday in the journal Nature Scientific Reports, finds that even isolated coral reefs, far away from localized human degradation like fishing and pollution--long assumed to be the primary causes of reef destruction--are no better off than those near coastal areas with human populations.
That means addressing localized problems won't be effective in salvaging these critical marine ecosystems unless greenhouse gas emissions are curbed first, the study concludes.
"We were surprised to discover that even those reefs most isolated from local impacts like pollution and fishing were no better off in terms of coral and seaweed cover," said lead author John Bruno, a professor of marine ecology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "This finding totally overturns a major paradigm in reef ecology and conservation: the assumption that isolated reefs are near-pristine and more resilient to global warming."
The study, which analyzed more than 1,700 coral reef surveys across the world, was released amid a mass bleaching event that has devastated some of the world's most pristine coral reefs. A study in April found that sections of the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) have been all but destroyed, with 50 percent of the GBR's northern section already dead and much of it "severely" bleached.
Bleaching occurs when overly warm ocean waters cause coral to expel internal algae, which turns the coral white and erodes its structures. The loss of structure makes shorelines more vulnerable and destroys natural habitats for marine life.
Abel Valdivia, a marine ecologist with the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and an author of the paper, said Wednesday, "Widespread arguments that coral reef degradation is mostly caused by local factors are unsupported. We found the problem is better explained by global impacts such as climate change."
"To save coral reefs, we need to reduce our overreliance on fossil fuels and lead global efforts to swiftly and drastically cut carbon emissions in the coming decades. Local management alone won't cut it," Valdivia said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Climate change is the primary cause of coral reef degradation around the world, according to a groundbreaking new study that casts doubt on the previous scientific understanding of reef erosion.
The research, published Wednesday in the journal Nature Scientific Reports, finds that even isolated coral reefs, far away from localized human degradation like fishing and pollution--long assumed to be the primary causes of reef destruction--are no better off than those near coastal areas with human populations.
That means addressing localized problems won't be effective in salvaging these critical marine ecosystems unless greenhouse gas emissions are curbed first, the study concludes.
"We were surprised to discover that even those reefs most isolated from local impacts like pollution and fishing were no better off in terms of coral and seaweed cover," said lead author John Bruno, a professor of marine ecology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "This finding totally overturns a major paradigm in reef ecology and conservation: the assumption that isolated reefs are near-pristine and more resilient to global warming."
The study, which analyzed more than 1,700 coral reef surveys across the world, was released amid a mass bleaching event that has devastated some of the world's most pristine coral reefs. A study in April found that sections of the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) have been all but destroyed, with 50 percent of the GBR's northern section already dead and much of it "severely" bleached.
Bleaching occurs when overly warm ocean waters cause coral to expel internal algae, which turns the coral white and erodes its structures. The loss of structure makes shorelines more vulnerable and destroys natural habitats for marine life.
Abel Valdivia, a marine ecologist with the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and an author of the paper, said Wednesday, "Widespread arguments that coral reef degradation is mostly caused by local factors are unsupported. We found the problem is better explained by global impacts such as climate change."
"To save coral reefs, we need to reduce our overreliance on fossil fuels and lead global efforts to swiftly and drastically cut carbon emissions in the coming decades. Local management alone won't cut it," Valdivia said.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Climate change is the primary cause of coral reef degradation around the world, according to a groundbreaking new study that casts doubt on the previous scientific understanding of reef erosion.
The research, published Wednesday in the journal Nature Scientific Reports, finds that even isolated coral reefs, far away from localized human degradation like fishing and pollution--long assumed to be the primary causes of reef destruction--are no better off than those near coastal areas with human populations.
That means addressing localized problems won't be effective in salvaging these critical marine ecosystems unless greenhouse gas emissions are curbed first, the study concludes.
"We were surprised to discover that even those reefs most isolated from local impacts like pollution and fishing were no better off in terms of coral and seaweed cover," said lead author John Bruno, a professor of marine ecology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "This finding totally overturns a major paradigm in reef ecology and conservation: the assumption that isolated reefs are near-pristine and more resilient to global warming."
The study, which analyzed more than 1,700 coral reef surveys across the world, was released amid a mass bleaching event that has devastated some of the world's most pristine coral reefs. A study in April found that sections of the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) have been all but destroyed, with 50 percent of the GBR's northern section already dead and much of it "severely" bleached.
Bleaching occurs when overly warm ocean waters cause coral to expel internal algae, which turns the coral white and erodes its structures. The loss of structure makes shorelines more vulnerable and destroys natural habitats for marine life.
Abel Valdivia, a marine ecologist with the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and an author of the paper, said Wednesday, "Widespread arguments that coral reef degradation is mostly caused by local factors are unsupported. We found the problem is better explained by global impacts such as climate change."
"To save coral reefs, we need to reduce our overreliance on fossil fuels and lead global efforts to swiftly and drastically cut carbon emissions in the coming decades. Local management alone won't cut it," Valdivia said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.