SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Exxon Has No Free Speech Rights to Commit Fraud, say Climate Groups
Exxon's "preemptive strike to shut down the investigation before it is completed should not be countenanced," says Union of Concerned Scientists
Jun 17, 2016
ExxonMobil is attempting to evade a growing investigation into its campaign to suppress science about climate change, asking a federal court this week to throw out a subpoena that would force the oil giant to hand over decades of documents to a coalition of state attorneys general.
In its filing with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas in Fort Worth, Exxon argued that the subpoena from Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey violated Constitutional amendments on free speech, equal protection, and unreasonable search and seizure.
Healey is part of the coalition investigating whether Exxon intentionally deceived its shareholders and the public about the threat of global warming after its decades-long campaign to suppress climate science was revealed in 2015 by the Los Angeles Times and InsideClimate News. Healey's subpoena also seeks communications between the oil company and free-market business groups that expressed doubt about the efficacy of contradicting evidence of global warming, Reuters reports.
Healey's office said it was reviewing the motion, but climate advocates said the filing should not be taken seriously.
"No company has a First Amendment right to knowingly provide misinformation about the harm associated with its product," Ken Kimmell, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists, said Thursday. "State attorneys general, including in Massachusetts, have every right to investigate whether the company's actions amounted to an actionable fraud."
Exxon's "preemptive strike to shut down the investigation before it is completed should not be countenanced," Kimmell said.
The oil company argued in its filing on Wednesday that the subpoena is asking for documents that are outside the statute of limitations and that "the great irony" in the case is that it has "acknowledged the risks of climate change for more than a decade."
Despite that claim, Exxon executives spent last month's shareholder meeting pushing back against proposals that demanded to know how the company would respond to the historic Paris agreement to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
"CEO Rex Tillerson misleadingly spoke about uncertainties in climate science, while ExxonMobil continues to fund industry front groups that also sow doubt about the climate risks of burning oil, coal and gas," Kimmell said. "There is more than sufficient evidence to warrant the investigation by Attorney General Healey into whether state laws have been violated."
Healey was the latest to join the game-changing coalition of 17 state attorneys general, including those from California, New York, and the Virgin Islands, to look into the scandal. Exxon is also fighting a racketeering investigation launched by Virgin Islands Attorney General Claude Walker.
The oil company is backed by a smaller group of conservative attorneys general, including those from Texas and Alabama, who announced in May that they would be taking Exxon's side in the fight.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
ExxonMobil is attempting to evade a growing investigation into its campaign to suppress science about climate change, asking a federal court this week to throw out a subpoena that would force the oil giant to hand over decades of documents to a coalition of state attorneys general.
In its filing with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas in Fort Worth, Exxon argued that the subpoena from Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey violated Constitutional amendments on free speech, equal protection, and unreasonable search and seizure.
Healey is part of the coalition investigating whether Exxon intentionally deceived its shareholders and the public about the threat of global warming after its decades-long campaign to suppress climate science was revealed in 2015 by the Los Angeles Times and InsideClimate News. Healey's subpoena also seeks communications between the oil company and free-market business groups that expressed doubt about the efficacy of contradicting evidence of global warming, Reuters reports.
Healey's office said it was reviewing the motion, but climate advocates said the filing should not be taken seriously.
"No company has a First Amendment right to knowingly provide misinformation about the harm associated with its product," Ken Kimmell, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists, said Thursday. "State attorneys general, including in Massachusetts, have every right to investigate whether the company's actions amounted to an actionable fraud."
Exxon's "preemptive strike to shut down the investigation before it is completed should not be countenanced," Kimmell said.
The oil company argued in its filing on Wednesday that the subpoena is asking for documents that are outside the statute of limitations and that "the great irony" in the case is that it has "acknowledged the risks of climate change for more than a decade."
Despite that claim, Exxon executives spent last month's shareholder meeting pushing back against proposals that demanded to know how the company would respond to the historic Paris agreement to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
"CEO Rex Tillerson misleadingly spoke about uncertainties in climate science, while ExxonMobil continues to fund industry front groups that also sow doubt about the climate risks of burning oil, coal and gas," Kimmell said. "There is more than sufficient evidence to warrant the investigation by Attorney General Healey into whether state laws have been violated."
Healey was the latest to join the game-changing coalition of 17 state attorneys general, including those from California, New York, and the Virgin Islands, to look into the scandal. Exxon is also fighting a racketeering investigation launched by Virgin Islands Attorney General Claude Walker.
The oil company is backed by a smaller group of conservative attorneys general, including those from Texas and Alabama, who announced in May that they would be taking Exxon's side in the fight.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
ExxonMobil is attempting to evade a growing investigation into its campaign to suppress science about climate change, asking a federal court this week to throw out a subpoena that would force the oil giant to hand over decades of documents to a coalition of state attorneys general.
In its filing with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas in Fort Worth, Exxon argued that the subpoena from Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey violated Constitutional amendments on free speech, equal protection, and unreasonable search and seizure.
Healey is part of the coalition investigating whether Exxon intentionally deceived its shareholders and the public about the threat of global warming after its decades-long campaign to suppress climate science was revealed in 2015 by the Los Angeles Times and InsideClimate News. Healey's subpoena also seeks communications between the oil company and free-market business groups that expressed doubt about the efficacy of contradicting evidence of global warming, Reuters reports.
Healey's office said it was reviewing the motion, but climate advocates said the filing should not be taken seriously.
"No company has a First Amendment right to knowingly provide misinformation about the harm associated with its product," Ken Kimmell, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists, said Thursday. "State attorneys general, including in Massachusetts, have every right to investigate whether the company's actions amounted to an actionable fraud."
Exxon's "preemptive strike to shut down the investigation before it is completed should not be countenanced," Kimmell said.
The oil company argued in its filing on Wednesday that the subpoena is asking for documents that are outside the statute of limitations and that "the great irony" in the case is that it has "acknowledged the risks of climate change for more than a decade."
Despite that claim, Exxon executives spent last month's shareholder meeting pushing back against proposals that demanded to know how the company would respond to the historic Paris agreement to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
"CEO Rex Tillerson misleadingly spoke about uncertainties in climate science, while ExxonMobil continues to fund industry front groups that also sow doubt about the climate risks of burning oil, coal and gas," Kimmell said. "There is more than sufficient evidence to warrant the investigation by Attorney General Healey into whether state laws have been violated."
Healey was the latest to join the game-changing coalition of 17 state attorneys general, including those from California, New York, and the Virgin Islands, to look into the scandal. Exxon is also fighting a racketeering investigation launched by Virgin Islands Attorney General Claude Walker.
The oil company is backed by a smaller group of conservative attorneys general, including those from Texas and Alabama, who announced in May that they would be taking Exxon's side in the fight.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.