SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
FBI Paid Hackers to Unlock San Bernardino iPhone
Snowden tweeted, "Prediction: FBI's refusal to disclose security holes found during iPhone hack will result in attack being globally available by year's end."
Apr 13, 2016
The FBI paid professional hackers to unlock the suspected San Bernardino shooter's iPhone after a months-long unsuccessful attempt to force Apple to create decryption software, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.
The hackers reportedly discovered and alerted the bureau to at least one previously unknown security flaw in the phone's software, which they then used to create hardware that helped the FBI crack the phone's passcode.
Previous speculation on who would help the FBI in lieu of Apple had pointed to the Israeli security firm Cellebrite, but the bureau apparently turned to a different service in this case, the Post noted.
Reporter Ellen Nakashima writes:
Some hackers, known as "white hats," disclose the vulnerabilities to the firms responsible for the software or to the public so they can be fixed and are generally regarded as ethical. Others, called "black hats," use the information to hack network and steal people's personal information.
At least one of the people who helped the FBI in the San Bernardino case falls into a third category, often considered ethically murky: researchers who sell flaws--for instance, to governments or to companies that make surveillance tools.
This last group, dubbed "gray hats," can be controversial. Critics say they might be helping governments spy on their own citizens.
"Some of the most admired tech experts/hackers are those who find vulnerabilities/exploits & sell them to the US govt," tweeted journalist Glenn Greenwald.
The government must now decide whether to disclose the security flaws to Apple, Nakashima wrote, "a decision that probably will be made by a White House-led group."
FBI director James Comey has previously expressed hesitation at sharing the information, positing last week that Apple would "fix it and then we're back where we started from." He said the hack only works on iPhone 5C models running the iOS 9 operating system.
But as experts have long noted, there is more at stake than just one case or one phone, and new risks are raised through this development. Whistleblower Edward Snowden said Wednesday on Twitter, "Prediction: FBI's refusal to disclose security holes found during iPhone hack will result in attack being globally available by year's end."
Andrew Crocker, staff attorney with the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation, added:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The FBI paid professional hackers to unlock the suspected San Bernardino shooter's iPhone after a months-long unsuccessful attempt to force Apple to create decryption software, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.
The hackers reportedly discovered and alerted the bureau to at least one previously unknown security flaw in the phone's software, which they then used to create hardware that helped the FBI crack the phone's passcode.
Previous speculation on who would help the FBI in lieu of Apple had pointed to the Israeli security firm Cellebrite, but the bureau apparently turned to a different service in this case, the Post noted.
Reporter Ellen Nakashima writes:
Some hackers, known as "white hats," disclose the vulnerabilities to the firms responsible for the software or to the public so they can be fixed and are generally regarded as ethical. Others, called "black hats," use the information to hack network and steal people's personal information.
At least one of the people who helped the FBI in the San Bernardino case falls into a third category, often considered ethically murky: researchers who sell flaws--for instance, to governments or to companies that make surveillance tools.
This last group, dubbed "gray hats," can be controversial. Critics say they might be helping governments spy on their own citizens.
"Some of the most admired tech experts/hackers are those who find vulnerabilities/exploits & sell them to the US govt," tweeted journalist Glenn Greenwald.
The government must now decide whether to disclose the security flaws to Apple, Nakashima wrote, "a decision that probably will be made by a White House-led group."
FBI director James Comey has previously expressed hesitation at sharing the information, positing last week that Apple would "fix it and then we're back where we started from." He said the hack only works on iPhone 5C models running the iOS 9 operating system.
But as experts have long noted, there is more at stake than just one case or one phone, and new risks are raised through this development. Whistleblower Edward Snowden said Wednesday on Twitter, "Prediction: FBI's refusal to disclose security holes found during iPhone hack will result in attack being globally available by year's end."
Andrew Crocker, staff attorney with the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation, added:
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The FBI paid professional hackers to unlock the suspected San Bernardino shooter's iPhone after a months-long unsuccessful attempt to force Apple to create decryption software, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.
The hackers reportedly discovered and alerted the bureau to at least one previously unknown security flaw in the phone's software, which they then used to create hardware that helped the FBI crack the phone's passcode.
Previous speculation on who would help the FBI in lieu of Apple had pointed to the Israeli security firm Cellebrite, but the bureau apparently turned to a different service in this case, the Post noted.
Reporter Ellen Nakashima writes:
Some hackers, known as "white hats," disclose the vulnerabilities to the firms responsible for the software or to the public so they can be fixed and are generally regarded as ethical. Others, called "black hats," use the information to hack network and steal people's personal information.
At least one of the people who helped the FBI in the San Bernardino case falls into a third category, often considered ethically murky: researchers who sell flaws--for instance, to governments or to companies that make surveillance tools.
This last group, dubbed "gray hats," can be controversial. Critics say they might be helping governments spy on their own citizens.
"Some of the most admired tech experts/hackers are those who find vulnerabilities/exploits & sell them to the US govt," tweeted journalist Glenn Greenwald.
The government must now decide whether to disclose the security flaws to Apple, Nakashima wrote, "a decision that probably will be made by a White House-led group."
FBI director James Comey has previously expressed hesitation at sharing the information, positing last week that Apple would "fix it and then we're back where we started from." He said the hack only works on iPhone 5C models running the iOS 9 operating system.
But as experts have long noted, there is more at stake than just one case or one phone, and new risks are raised through this development. Whistleblower Edward Snowden said Wednesday on Twitter, "Prediction: FBI's refusal to disclose security holes found during iPhone hack will result in attack being globally available by year's end."
Andrew Crocker, staff attorney with the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation, added:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.