SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
General John F. Campbell pictured in Kabul, Afghanistan, Saturday, May 23, 2015.
If the highest-ranking U.S. and NATO military commander in Afghanistan gets his way, America's longest official war could become even more protracted.
Army General John Campbell said in a USA Today article published on Tuesday that he wants to keep the 9,800 American troops currently in Afghanistan there for as long as possible--and is considering asking for even more boots on the ground.
"My intent would be to keep as much as I could for as long as I could," Campbell told the paper from Kabul.
"Every time I've gone to the president and said, 'I need X,' I've been very, very fortunate that he's provided that."
--Army General John Campbell
The general's comments follow President Obama's October announcement that he plans to reverse his pledge to remove all but 1,000 U.S. troops from the country by the conclusion of 2016. Instead, Obama proclaimed that the 9,800 troops would be maintained through most of 2016 and cut to 5,500 by the beginning of 2017.
Even then, Obama's statement came despite the official declaration a year ago that the war was "over."
But now Campbell plans to ask the president to put off troop withdrawals even further by delaying the reduction to 5,500 troops.
"If I don't believe that we can accomplish the train, advise and assist... the (counter-terrorism) missions, then I owe it to the senior leadership to come back and say, 'Here's what I need,'" Campbell said. "If that's more people, it's more people."
The general expressed confidence that he would get his way. "My job as commander on the ground is to make assessments continually," Campbell said. "Every time I've gone to the president and said, 'I need X,' I've been very fortunate that he's provided that. So he's been very flexible."
Campbell's comments come as the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan stretches well into its 15th year--and appears certain to extend into the next presidency. While many argue that the Afghanistan intervention is not, in reality, the longest war in U.S. history, it is widely recognized as the most protracted, according to the official record.
What's more, the Bilateral Security Agreement signed in 2014 by the U.S. and Afghanistan locks in another decade of heavy American involvement in the country, including the training, funding, and arming of the Afghan military. The pact also secures immunity for U.S. service members under Afghan law--a highly controversial measure in a country that has suffered civilian massacres by U.S. troops.
The U.S. is planning a military role long into Afghanistan's future despite indications that its long-term intervention and occupation so far has worsened conflict and violence, with the Taliban now showing signs of increased strength.
Meanwhile, Afghan civilians continue to pay the greatest price. In the first half of 2015 alone, United Nations agencies documented 4,921 civilian casualties (1,592 deaths and 3,329 injured).
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
If the highest-ranking U.S. and NATO military commander in Afghanistan gets his way, America's longest official war could become even more protracted.
Army General John Campbell said in a USA Today article published on Tuesday that he wants to keep the 9,800 American troops currently in Afghanistan there for as long as possible--and is considering asking for even more boots on the ground.
"My intent would be to keep as much as I could for as long as I could," Campbell told the paper from Kabul.
"Every time I've gone to the president and said, 'I need X,' I've been very, very fortunate that he's provided that."
--Army General John Campbell
The general's comments follow President Obama's October announcement that he plans to reverse his pledge to remove all but 1,000 U.S. troops from the country by the conclusion of 2016. Instead, Obama proclaimed that the 9,800 troops would be maintained through most of 2016 and cut to 5,500 by the beginning of 2017.
Even then, Obama's statement came despite the official declaration a year ago that the war was "over."
But now Campbell plans to ask the president to put off troop withdrawals even further by delaying the reduction to 5,500 troops.
"If I don't believe that we can accomplish the train, advise and assist... the (counter-terrorism) missions, then I owe it to the senior leadership to come back and say, 'Here's what I need,'" Campbell said. "If that's more people, it's more people."
The general expressed confidence that he would get his way. "My job as commander on the ground is to make assessments continually," Campbell said. "Every time I've gone to the president and said, 'I need X,' I've been very fortunate that he's provided that. So he's been very flexible."
Campbell's comments come as the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan stretches well into its 15th year--and appears certain to extend into the next presidency. While many argue that the Afghanistan intervention is not, in reality, the longest war in U.S. history, it is widely recognized as the most protracted, according to the official record.
What's more, the Bilateral Security Agreement signed in 2014 by the U.S. and Afghanistan locks in another decade of heavy American involvement in the country, including the training, funding, and arming of the Afghan military. The pact also secures immunity for U.S. service members under Afghan law--a highly controversial measure in a country that has suffered civilian massacres by U.S. troops.
The U.S. is planning a military role long into Afghanistan's future despite indications that its long-term intervention and occupation so far has worsened conflict and violence, with the Taliban now showing signs of increased strength.
Meanwhile, Afghan civilians continue to pay the greatest price. In the first half of 2015 alone, United Nations agencies documented 4,921 civilian casualties (1,592 deaths and 3,329 injured).
If the highest-ranking U.S. and NATO military commander in Afghanistan gets his way, America's longest official war could become even more protracted.
Army General John Campbell said in a USA Today article published on Tuesday that he wants to keep the 9,800 American troops currently in Afghanistan there for as long as possible--and is considering asking for even more boots on the ground.
"My intent would be to keep as much as I could for as long as I could," Campbell told the paper from Kabul.
"Every time I've gone to the president and said, 'I need X,' I've been very, very fortunate that he's provided that."
--Army General John Campbell
The general's comments follow President Obama's October announcement that he plans to reverse his pledge to remove all but 1,000 U.S. troops from the country by the conclusion of 2016. Instead, Obama proclaimed that the 9,800 troops would be maintained through most of 2016 and cut to 5,500 by the beginning of 2017.
Even then, Obama's statement came despite the official declaration a year ago that the war was "over."
But now Campbell plans to ask the president to put off troop withdrawals even further by delaying the reduction to 5,500 troops.
"If I don't believe that we can accomplish the train, advise and assist... the (counter-terrorism) missions, then I owe it to the senior leadership to come back and say, 'Here's what I need,'" Campbell said. "If that's more people, it's more people."
The general expressed confidence that he would get his way. "My job as commander on the ground is to make assessments continually," Campbell said. "Every time I've gone to the president and said, 'I need X,' I've been very fortunate that he's provided that. So he's been very flexible."
Campbell's comments come as the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan stretches well into its 15th year--and appears certain to extend into the next presidency. While many argue that the Afghanistan intervention is not, in reality, the longest war in U.S. history, it is widely recognized as the most protracted, according to the official record.
What's more, the Bilateral Security Agreement signed in 2014 by the U.S. and Afghanistan locks in another decade of heavy American involvement in the country, including the training, funding, and arming of the Afghan military. The pact also secures immunity for U.S. service members under Afghan law--a highly controversial measure in a country that has suffered civilian massacres by U.S. troops.
The U.S. is planning a military role long into Afghanistan's future despite indications that its long-term intervention and occupation so far has worsened conflict and violence, with the Taliban now showing signs of increased strength.
Meanwhile, Afghan civilians continue to pay the greatest price. In the first half of 2015 alone, United Nations agencies documented 4,921 civilian casualties (1,592 deaths and 3,329 injured).