

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
An investigation by CBC News into the relationship between the University of Calgary and Canada's largest pipeline company has revealed "a university bending over backward to accommodate the apparent public relations ambitions of a corporate patron."
According to reporters Kyle Bakx and Paul Haavardsrud, emails obtained from a freedom of information request suggest "a pattern of corporate influence during the bungled attempt to establish a new research center that cost the university top level academic talent and its Haskayne School of Business upwards of a million dollars in corporate sponsorship."
"Most damningly it smacks of us being apologists for the fossil fuel industry rather than independent scholars and teachers doing work in broadly defined area."
--U of C professor Harrie Vredenburg
To establish the Enbridge Center for Corporate Sustainability at U of C, the corporation behind controversial pipeline proposals including Energy East and Northern Gateway reportedly pledged $2.25 million over a 10-year period.
The benefits for the company "seemed straightforward," write Bakx and Haavardsrud:
A series of industry pipeline spills were not doing the company any favours. If the centre could help to win hearts and minds for its existing operations or a major new project like the Northern Gateway pipeline, which was grinding through a controversial regulatory review and months of contentious public hearings, then presumably it would be a few million dollars well spent.
When viewed through the lens of the outrage caused by oil spilling into a pristine Midwest river--one of the largest inland oil spills in U.S. history--a partnership between the U of C and Central Michigan University, which some would argue makes little sense on paper, becomes much more understandable.
What the company wanted in return, however, raised some eyebrows.
CBC reports:
Beyond naming rights, Enbridge sought to influence board memberships, staffing and the type of students that would be considered for awards, the emails show.
The company hired its own public relations firm to publicize the centre's launch, and also wanted "customized opportunities" for Enbridge executives and clients to meet with researchers at the U of C's Haskayne School of Business.
"Enbridge is doing too much tune calling, in my view, to the point that the Center's usefulness to [Haskayne school] academics is being sacrificed to Enbridge's PR objectives," business professor Harrie Vredenburg wrote in a 2012 email complaint to Leonard Waverman, the dean of the Haskayne School of Business at the time.
"Most damningly," Vredenburg added, "it smacks of us being apologists for the fossil fuel industry rather than independent scholars and teachers doing work in broadly defined area."
"I am not sure what we are signing up for," U of C's Svare chair in applied decision research, professor Joe Arvai, wrote in a separate email to Waverman in 2012. "I have the impression that Enbridge sees the centre as a PR machine for themselves, whereas I see it as an academic research centre."
Arvai, who had been tapped to head the new venture, stepped down as the head of the Enbridge center before its launch. He has since left U of C for the University of Michigan.
Based on conversations he had "with many people who were involved, including Joe," climate scientist and former U of C professor David Keith told CBC that Arvai was removed as director of the center "before its formation at the specific request of Enbridge."
Last fall, CBC reports, Enbridge's name was taken off the center--it is now just the Center for Corporate Sustainability. Under a revised agreement, the company also dropped its funding to the school by one million dollars. Enbridge continues to sponsor the center's seminar series, as well as arrangements with several other university departments.
Such conflicts of interest, however, are sure to keep cropping up. As Bakx and Haavardsrud write, "corporate money is becoming a more critical part of the funding model for Canadian universities as they no longer receive the same level of financial support from government as they once did."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
An investigation by CBC News into the relationship between the University of Calgary and Canada's largest pipeline company has revealed "a university bending over backward to accommodate the apparent public relations ambitions of a corporate patron."
According to reporters Kyle Bakx and Paul Haavardsrud, emails obtained from a freedom of information request suggest "a pattern of corporate influence during the bungled attempt to establish a new research center that cost the university top level academic talent and its Haskayne School of Business upwards of a million dollars in corporate sponsorship."
"Most damningly it smacks of us being apologists for the fossil fuel industry rather than independent scholars and teachers doing work in broadly defined area."
--U of C professor Harrie Vredenburg
To establish the Enbridge Center for Corporate Sustainability at U of C, the corporation behind controversial pipeline proposals including Energy East and Northern Gateway reportedly pledged $2.25 million over a 10-year period.
The benefits for the company "seemed straightforward," write Bakx and Haavardsrud:
A series of industry pipeline spills were not doing the company any favours. If the centre could help to win hearts and minds for its existing operations or a major new project like the Northern Gateway pipeline, which was grinding through a controversial regulatory review and months of contentious public hearings, then presumably it would be a few million dollars well spent.
When viewed through the lens of the outrage caused by oil spilling into a pristine Midwest river--one of the largest inland oil spills in U.S. history--a partnership between the U of C and Central Michigan University, which some would argue makes little sense on paper, becomes much more understandable.
What the company wanted in return, however, raised some eyebrows.
CBC reports:
Beyond naming rights, Enbridge sought to influence board memberships, staffing and the type of students that would be considered for awards, the emails show.
The company hired its own public relations firm to publicize the centre's launch, and also wanted "customized opportunities" for Enbridge executives and clients to meet with researchers at the U of C's Haskayne School of Business.
"Enbridge is doing too much tune calling, in my view, to the point that the Center's usefulness to [Haskayne school] academics is being sacrificed to Enbridge's PR objectives," business professor Harrie Vredenburg wrote in a 2012 email complaint to Leonard Waverman, the dean of the Haskayne School of Business at the time.
"Most damningly," Vredenburg added, "it smacks of us being apologists for the fossil fuel industry rather than independent scholars and teachers doing work in broadly defined area."
"I am not sure what we are signing up for," U of C's Svare chair in applied decision research, professor Joe Arvai, wrote in a separate email to Waverman in 2012. "I have the impression that Enbridge sees the centre as a PR machine for themselves, whereas I see it as an academic research centre."
Arvai, who had been tapped to head the new venture, stepped down as the head of the Enbridge center before its launch. He has since left U of C for the University of Michigan.
Based on conversations he had "with many people who were involved, including Joe," climate scientist and former U of C professor David Keith told CBC that Arvai was removed as director of the center "before its formation at the specific request of Enbridge."
Last fall, CBC reports, Enbridge's name was taken off the center--it is now just the Center for Corporate Sustainability. Under a revised agreement, the company also dropped its funding to the school by one million dollars. Enbridge continues to sponsor the center's seminar series, as well as arrangements with several other university departments.
Such conflicts of interest, however, are sure to keep cropping up. As Bakx and Haavardsrud write, "corporate money is becoming a more critical part of the funding model for Canadian universities as they no longer receive the same level of financial support from government as they once did."
An investigation by CBC News into the relationship between the University of Calgary and Canada's largest pipeline company has revealed "a university bending over backward to accommodate the apparent public relations ambitions of a corporate patron."
According to reporters Kyle Bakx and Paul Haavardsrud, emails obtained from a freedom of information request suggest "a pattern of corporate influence during the bungled attempt to establish a new research center that cost the university top level academic talent and its Haskayne School of Business upwards of a million dollars in corporate sponsorship."
"Most damningly it smacks of us being apologists for the fossil fuel industry rather than independent scholars and teachers doing work in broadly defined area."
--U of C professor Harrie Vredenburg
To establish the Enbridge Center for Corporate Sustainability at U of C, the corporation behind controversial pipeline proposals including Energy East and Northern Gateway reportedly pledged $2.25 million over a 10-year period.
The benefits for the company "seemed straightforward," write Bakx and Haavardsrud:
A series of industry pipeline spills were not doing the company any favours. If the centre could help to win hearts and minds for its existing operations or a major new project like the Northern Gateway pipeline, which was grinding through a controversial regulatory review and months of contentious public hearings, then presumably it would be a few million dollars well spent.
When viewed through the lens of the outrage caused by oil spilling into a pristine Midwest river--one of the largest inland oil spills in U.S. history--a partnership between the U of C and Central Michigan University, which some would argue makes little sense on paper, becomes much more understandable.
What the company wanted in return, however, raised some eyebrows.
CBC reports:
Beyond naming rights, Enbridge sought to influence board memberships, staffing and the type of students that would be considered for awards, the emails show.
The company hired its own public relations firm to publicize the centre's launch, and also wanted "customized opportunities" for Enbridge executives and clients to meet with researchers at the U of C's Haskayne School of Business.
"Enbridge is doing too much tune calling, in my view, to the point that the Center's usefulness to [Haskayne school] academics is being sacrificed to Enbridge's PR objectives," business professor Harrie Vredenburg wrote in a 2012 email complaint to Leonard Waverman, the dean of the Haskayne School of Business at the time.
"Most damningly," Vredenburg added, "it smacks of us being apologists for the fossil fuel industry rather than independent scholars and teachers doing work in broadly defined area."
"I am not sure what we are signing up for," U of C's Svare chair in applied decision research, professor Joe Arvai, wrote in a separate email to Waverman in 2012. "I have the impression that Enbridge sees the centre as a PR machine for themselves, whereas I see it as an academic research centre."
Arvai, who had been tapped to head the new venture, stepped down as the head of the Enbridge center before its launch. He has since left U of C for the University of Michigan.
Based on conversations he had "with many people who were involved, including Joe," climate scientist and former U of C professor David Keith told CBC that Arvai was removed as director of the center "before its formation at the specific request of Enbridge."
Last fall, CBC reports, Enbridge's name was taken off the center--it is now just the Center for Corporate Sustainability. Under a revised agreement, the company also dropped its funding to the school by one million dollars. Enbridge continues to sponsor the center's seminar series, as well as arrangements with several other university departments.
Such conflicts of interest, however, are sure to keep cropping up. As Bakx and Haavardsrud write, "corporate money is becoming a more critical part of the funding model for Canadian universities as they no longer receive the same level of financial support from government as they once did."