SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To Prevent Police Brutality, Overhaul Police Culture: Report
Police Executive Research Forum finds pervasive culture of competitiveness and aggression in departments around the country
Aug 20, 2015
Many high-profile instances of police brutality over the past year could have been avoided by addressing law enforcement culture, training, and supervision--and an overhaul of police institutions is crucial to prevent more of those cases, a new study released Thursday concluded.
The Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), a nonprofit policy organization based in Washington, D.C., analyzed several cases in which officers used excessive force as a first-resort means of addressing situations and found that, in departments throughout the country, police do not receive adequate training in communication, crisis intervention, and nonviolent de-escalation of crises.
Instead, a pervasive culture of aggression and competition encourages officers to react with force, even when suspects are unarmed, which has caused "missed opportunities to ratchet down the encounter, to slow things down, to call in additional resources," PERF executive director Chuck Wexler wrote in a summary of the report, Re-Engineering Training On Police Use of Force (pdf).
"Sometimes there is a feeling of competitiveness about it," he wrote. "If an officer slows a situation down and calls for assistance, there is sometimes a feeling that other responding officers will think, 'What, you couldn't handle this yourself?'"
Deescalating tension or calling in additional resources is often perceived as being "antithetical" to police culture.
Amid the growing prominence of the Black Lives Matter movement, police brutality cases--particularly those that are caught on video, such as the killing of Eric Garner, the arrest of Sandra Bland, or the assault on a group of swimsuit-clad teenagers in McKinney, Texas--have become much harder for departments to ignore. The report found that forces in Seattle, Washington; Las Vegas, Nevada; Leesburg, Virginia; and Oakland, California, among other cities, are overhauling tactical training to focus more on de-escalation and "emotional intelligence."
However, in outlining those efforts, the study also reveals how far behind the departments were, sometimes lacking seemingly fundamentals. For instance, as Las Vegas police chief Kirk Primas explained, "Our sheriff recognized that we had to change, including a change in the department's culture. So we revamped our policies, and we put 'respect for the sanctity of human life' in the first paragraph of our use-of-force policy."
Meanwhile, PERF's study comes soon after Amnesty International released a separate report which found that each of the 50 states has failed to comply with global standards on police use-of-force and engaged in "a widespread pattern of racially discriminatory treatment by law enforcement officers and an alarming use of lethal force nationwide."
"Police have a fundamental obligation to protect human life. Deadly force must be reserved as a method of absolute last resort," Steven W. Hawkins, executive director of Amnesty International USA, said at the time. "The fact that no state laws conform to this standard is deeply disturbing and raises serious human rights concerns."
Still, Wexler concluded that the resurgence of the racial justice movement and the sustained activism against police brutality is turning the tide on police culture.
"The last year has taught us that community oversight in the age of the Internet is a powerful force," Wexler writes. "The public's demands for increased accountability and transparency will continue to work their will on our 18,000 police departments."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Many high-profile instances of police brutality over the past year could have been avoided by addressing law enforcement culture, training, and supervision--and an overhaul of police institutions is crucial to prevent more of those cases, a new study released Thursday concluded.
The Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), a nonprofit policy organization based in Washington, D.C., analyzed several cases in which officers used excessive force as a first-resort means of addressing situations and found that, in departments throughout the country, police do not receive adequate training in communication, crisis intervention, and nonviolent de-escalation of crises.
Instead, a pervasive culture of aggression and competition encourages officers to react with force, even when suspects are unarmed, which has caused "missed opportunities to ratchet down the encounter, to slow things down, to call in additional resources," PERF executive director Chuck Wexler wrote in a summary of the report, Re-Engineering Training On Police Use of Force (pdf).
"Sometimes there is a feeling of competitiveness about it," he wrote. "If an officer slows a situation down and calls for assistance, there is sometimes a feeling that other responding officers will think, 'What, you couldn't handle this yourself?'"
Deescalating tension or calling in additional resources is often perceived as being "antithetical" to police culture.
Amid the growing prominence of the Black Lives Matter movement, police brutality cases--particularly those that are caught on video, such as the killing of Eric Garner, the arrest of Sandra Bland, or the assault on a group of swimsuit-clad teenagers in McKinney, Texas--have become much harder for departments to ignore. The report found that forces in Seattle, Washington; Las Vegas, Nevada; Leesburg, Virginia; and Oakland, California, among other cities, are overhauling tactical training to focus more on de-escalation and "emotional intelligence."
However, in outlining those efforts, the study also reveals how far behind the departments were, sometimes lacking seemingly fundamentals. For instance, as Las Vegas police chief Kirk Primas explained, "Our sheriff recognized that we had to change, including a change in the department's culture. So we revamped our policies, and we put 'respect for the sanctity of human life' in the first paragraph of our use-of-force policy."
Meanwhile, PERF's study comes soon after Amnesty International released a separate report which found that each of the 50 states has failed to comply with global standards on police use-of-force and engaged in "a widespread pattern of racially discriminatory treatment by law enforcement officers and an alarming use of lethal force nationwide."
"Police have a fundamental obligation to protect human life. Deadly force must be reserved as a method of absolute last resort," Steven W. Hawkins, executive director of Amnesty International USA, said at the time. "The fact that no state laws conform to this standard is deeply disturbing and raises serious human rights concerns."
Still, Wexler concluded that the resurgence of the racial justice movement and the sustained activism against police brutality is turning the tide on police culture.
"The last year has taught us that community oversight in the age of the Internet is a powerful force," Wexler writes. "The public's demands for increased accountability and transparency will continue to work their will on our 18,000 police departments."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Many high-profile instances of police brutality over the past year could have been avoided by addressing law enforcement culture, training, and supervision--and an overhaul of police institutions is crucial to prevent more of those cases, a new study released Thursday concluded.
The Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), a nonprofit policy organization based in Washington, D.C., analyzed several cases in which officers used excessive force as a first-resort means of addressing situations and found that, in departments throughout the country, police do not receive adequate training in communication, crisis intervention, and nonviolent de-escalation of crises.
Instead, a pervasive culture of aggression and competition encourages officers to react with force, even when suspects are unarmed, which has caused "missed opportunities to ratchet down the encounter, to slow things down, to call in additional resources," PERF executive director Chuck Wexler wrote in a summary of the report, Re-Engineering Training On Police Use of Force (pdf).
"Sometimes there is a feeling of competitiveness about it," he wrote. "If an officer slows a situation down and calls for assistance, there is sometimes a feeling that other responding officers will think, 'What, you couldn't handle this yourself?'"
Deescalating tension or calling in additional resources is often perceived as being "antithetical" to police culture.
Amid the growing prominence of the Black Lives Matter movement, police brutality cases--particularly those that are caught on video, such as the killing of Eric Garner, the arrest of Sandra Bland, or the assault on a group of swimsuit-clad teenagers in McKinney, Texas--have become much harder for departments to ignore. The report found that forces in Seattle, Washington; Las Vegas, Nevada; Leesburg, Virginia; and Oakland, California, among other cities, are overhauling tactical training to focus more on de-escalation and "emotional intelligence."
However, in outlining those efforts, the study also reveals how far behind the departments were, sometimes lacking seemingly fundamentals. For instance, as Las Vegas police chief Kirk Primas explained, "Our sheriff recognized that we had to change, including a change in the department's culture. So we revamped our policies, and we put 'respect for the sanctity of human life' in the first paragraph of our use-of-force policy."
Meanwhile, PERF's study comes soon after Amnesty International released a separate report which found that each of the 50 states has failed to comply with global standards on police use-of-force and engaged in "a widespread pattern of racially discriminatory treatment by law enforcement officers and an alarming use of lethal force nationwide."
"Police have a fundamental obligation to protect human life. Deadly force must be reserved as a method of absolute last resort," Steven W. Hawkins, executive director of Amnesty International USA, said at the time. "The fact that no state laws conform to this standard is deeply disturbing and raises serious human rights concerns."
Still, Wexler concluded that the resurgence of the racial justice movement and the sustained activism against police brutality is turning the tide on police culture.
"The last year has taught us that community oversight in the age of the Internet is a powerful force," Wexler writes. "The public's demands for increased accountability and transparency will continue to work their will on our 18,000 police departments."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.