

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Responding to a weak statement on fossil fuel extraction from Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Thursday, protesters at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire on Thursday demanded the former secretary of state "act on climate" if she wants their votes.
Clinton was questioned about her stance on banning fossil fuel extraction on public land, something she said she couldn't support "until we get alternatives into place," according to CNN.
In response, an audience member stood up and asked of Clinton: "Is your answer, and your refusal to take leadership on climate change, due to the fact that you have contributions from the fossil fuel industry in your campaign?"
Bloomberg reported Friday that lobbyists for big companies including ExxonMobil raised money for the Clinton campaign.
In fact, Paul Blumenthal and Kate Sheppard of the Huffington Post wrote on Friday, "[n]early all of the lobbyists bundling contributions for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign have at one time or another worked for the fossil fuel industry."
The Democratic frontrunner--whose progressive rival Bernie Sanders has noted the candidates' divergence on the urgency of climate change--denied that her stances on climate-related issues were based on campaign contributions.
She said that while she knew that the "right answer in terms of getting votes" would have been to say, "You bet I will ban extraction on public lands," such an answer would be meaningless without a concrete plan for getting it done in Congress.
As she continued to respond, a number of agitated audience members began chanting: "Act on climate." Elsewhere in the audience, two people held up a sign that read, "Ban extraction on public land."
"That's OK, that's OK, that's OK," Clinton said as they chanted. "I am all in favor of acting on climate."
Watch the full exchange below:
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Responding to a weak statement on fossil fuel extraction from Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Thursday, protesters at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire on Thursday demanded the former secretary of state "act on climate" if she wants their votes.
Clinton was questioned about her stance on banning fossil fuel extraction on public land, something she said she couldn't support "until we get alternatives into place," according to CNN.
In response, an audience member stood up and asked of Clinton: "Is your answer, and your refusal to take leadership on climate change, due to the fact that you have contributions from the fossil fuel industry in your campaign?"
Bloomberg reported Friday that lobbyists for big companies including ExxonMobil raised money for the Clinton campaign.
In fact, Paul Blumenthal and Kate Sheppard of the Huffington Post wrote on Friday, "[n]early all of the lobbyists bundling contributions for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign have at one time or another worked for the fossil fuel industry."
The Democratic frontrunner--whose progressive rival Bernie Sanders has noted the candidates' divergence on the urgency of climate change--denied that her stances on climate-related issues were based on campaign contributions.
She said that while she knew that the "right answer in terms of getting votes" would have been to say, "You bet I will ban extraction on public lands," such an answer would be meaningless without a concrete plan for getting it done in Congress.
As she continued to respond, a number of agitated audience members began chanting: "Act on climate." Elsewhere in the audience, two people held up a sign that read, "Ban extraction on public land."
"That's OK, that's OK, that's OK," Clinton said as they chanted. "I am all in favor of acting on climate."
Watch the full exchange below:
Responding to a weak statement on fossil fuel extraction from Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Thursday, protesters at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire on Thursday demanded the former secretary of state "act on climate" if she wants their votes.
Clinton was questioned about her stance on banning fossil fuel extraction on public land, something she said she couldn't support "until we get alternatives into place," according to CNN.
In response, an audience member stood up and asked of Clinton: "Is your answer, and your refusal to take leadership on climate change, due to the fact that you have contributions from the fossil fuel industry in your campaign?"
Bloomberg reported Friday that lobbyists for big companies including ExxonMobil raised money for the Clinton campaign.
In fact, Paul Blumenthal and Kate Sheppard of the Huffington Post wrote on Friday, "[n]early all of the lobbyists bundling contributions for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign have at one time or another worked for the fossil fuel industry."
The Democratic frontrunner--whose progressive rival Bernie Sanders has noted the candidates' divergence on the urgency of climate change--denied that her stances on climate-related issues were based on campaign contributions.
She said that while she knew that the "right answer in terms of getting votes" would have been to say, "You bet I will ban extraction on public lands," such an answer would be meaningless without a concrete plan for getting it done in Congress.
As she continued to respond, a number of agitated audience members began chanting: "Act on climate." Elsewhere in the audience, two people held up a sign that read, "Ban extraction on public land."
"That's OK, that's OK, that's OK," Clinton said as they chanted. "I am all in favor of acting on climate."
Watch the full exchange below: