SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Fire Shuts Down Belgian Nuclear Plant
Greenpeace campaigner warns of risks of reliance on aging nuclear reactors
Dec 01, 2014
An electrical fire on Sunday forced the temporary shutdown of a nuclear reactor in Belgium.
According to a statement by Elia, the county's transmission system operator, the fire broke out at Electrabel's high-voltage power station at the site of the Tihange 3 nuclear reactor, one of seven nuclear reactors in Belgium.
As a result of the transmission fire, which occurred outside of the nuclear zone, the reactor was put offline--the fourth nuclear reactor now offline in the country.
Belgium's Le Soir reports that no one was injured.
Preliminary investigations indicate it was the result of a technical failure, according to a spokesperson for Electrabel.
Eloi Glorieux, Senior Energy Campaigner for Greenpeace Belgium, wrote at the organization's blog that this latest incident shows once again that the country's reliance on large centralized nuclear power plants is unwise. Keeping aging reactors online will only result in more forced shutdowns and supply problems, while risking enormous socio-economic costs and the potential of serious accidents, he wrote.
The new shutdown and the country's reliance on nuclear power could worsen Belgium's energy situation this winter. As Reuters reported: "Belgium's power supply security became a concern after three reactors, accounting for about half of its nuclear capacity of 5,700 megawatts (MW), were taken offline because of cracks in their steel reactor casings."
In their Winter Outlook report released Monday Europe's' Transmission System Operators write: "The situation in winter 14-15 will potentially be very stressed for the Belgian system," due in part to the nuclear reactors being offline. This situation will cause Belgium to be energy import-dependent for the winter, the report states.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
An electrical fire on Sunday forced the temporary shutdown of a nuclear reactor in Belgium.
According to a statement by Elia, the county's transmission system operator, the fire broke out at Electrabel's high-voltage power station at the site of the Tihange 3 nuclear reactor, one of seven nuclear reactors in Belgium.
As a result of the transmission fire, which occurred outside of the nuclear zone, the reactor was put offline--the fourth nuclear reactor now offline in the country.
Belgium's Le Soir reports that no one was injured.
Preliminary investigations indicate it was the result of a technical failure, according to a spokesperson for Electrabel.
Eloi Glorieux, Senior Energy Campaigner for Greenpeace Belgium, wrote at the organization's blog that this latest incident shows once again that the country's reliance on large centralized nuclear power plants is unwise. Keeping aging reactors online will only result in more forced shutdowns and supply problems, while risking enormous socio-economic costs and the potential of serious accidents, he wrote.
The new shutdown and the country's reliance on nuclear power could worsen Belgium's energy situation this winter. As Reuters reported: "Belgium's power supply security became a concern after three reactors, accounting for about half of its nuclear capacity of 5,700 megawatts (MW), were taken offline because of cracks in their steel reactor casings."
In their Winter Outlook report released Monday Europe's' Transmission System Operators write: "The situation in winter 14-15 will potentially be very stressed for the Belgian system," due in part to the nuclear reactors being offline. This situation will cause Belgium to be energy import-dependent for the winter, the report states.
An electrical fire on Sunday forced the temporary shutdown of a nuclear reactor in Belgium.
According to a statement by Elia, the county's transmission system operator, the fire broke out at Electrabel's high-voltage power station at the site of the Tihange 3 nuclear reactor, one of seven nuclear reactors in Belgium.
As a result of the transmission fire, which occurred outside of the nuclear zone, the reactor was put offline--the fourth nuclear reactor now offline in the country.
Belgium's Le Soir reports that no one was injured.
Preliminary investigations indicate it was the result of a technical failure, according to a spokesperson for Electrabel.
Eloi Glorieux, Senior Energy Campaigner for Greenpeace Belgium, wrote at the organization's blog that this latest incident shows once again that the country's reliance on large centralized nuclear power plants is unwise. Keeping aging reactors online will only result in more forced shutdowns and supply problems, while risking enormous socio-economic costs and the potential of serious accidents, he wrote.
The new shutdown and the country's reliance on nuclear power could worsen Belgium's energy situation this winter. As Reuters reported: "Belgium's power supply security became a concern after three reactors, accounting for about half of its nuclear capacity of 5,700 megawatts (MW), were taken offline because of cracks in their steel reactor casings."
In their Winter Outlook report released Monday Europe's' Transmission System Operators write: "The situation in winter 14-15 will potentially be very stressed for the Belgian system," due in part to the nuclear reactors being offline. This situation will cause Belgium to be energy import-dependent for the winter, the report states.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.