SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Pharmaceutical Dumping Could Pose Risks to Wildlife, Scientists Warn
Research published Monday finds drugs for treating humans and animals are seeping into wild environments, causing changes in ecosystems
Oct 13, 2014
What happens when the drugs used to treat humans and animals are disposed? Scientific studies published Monday in a special issue of the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B reveal that pharmaceuticals, when flushed into land and water ecosystems, could pose risks to wildlife, from altering species' behavior to changing fertility rates to death.
Pharmaceuticals can enter wild environments through a variety of routes, including dumping from drug manufacturers, as well as sewage.
"Global pharmaceutical consumption is rising with the growing and aging human population and more intensive food production," write Kathryn E. Arnold of the University of York in the UK and colleagues. "Recent studies have revealed pharmaceutical residues in a wide range of ecosystems and organisms." Despite the scope of the issue, the effects of pharmaceuticals in the environment are little researched and understood.
But in the research series published Monday, scientists uncover a broad spectrum of impacts.
Wild starlings, exposed to the anti-depressant fluoxetine, undergo changes in behavior and physiology, including shifts in feeding frequency. At the Experimental Lakes Area in northwestern Ontario, Canada, estrogen from birth control pills was found to alter the entire ecosystem of the lake, leading to a decline in trout, an increase in insects, and the elimination of fathead minnows. Another study finds that amphibians, because most of them breed in water, "may therefore be exposed to water-borne pharmaceuticals during critical phases of the reproductive cycle," posing risks to fertility.
Researchers Anette Kuster and Nicole Adler, of Germany's Federal Environment Agency, point out, "For human medicinal products, hormones, antibiotics, analgesics, antidepressants and antineoplastics indicated an environmental risk. For veterinary products, hormones, antibiotics and parasiticides were most often discussed as being environmentally relevant."
They argue that more research and regulation is needed: "In order to minimize the quantity of pharmaceuticals in the environment [legislation and research] should aim to (i) improve the existing legislation for pharmaceuticals, (ii) prioritize pharmaceuticals in the environment and (iii) improve the availability and collection of pharmaceutical data."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
What happens when the drugs used to treat humans and animals are disposed? Scientific studies published Monday in a special issue of the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B reveal that pharmaceuticals, when flushed into land and water ecosystems, could pose risks to wildlife, from altering species' behavior to changing fertility rates to death.
Pharmaceuticals can enter wild environments through a variety of routes, including dumping from drug manufacturers, as well as sewage.
"Global pharmaceutical consumption is rising with the growing and aging human population and more intensive food production," write Kathryn E. Arnold of the University of York in the UK and colleagues. "Recent studies have revealed pharmaceutical residues in a wide range of ecosystems and organisms." Despite the scope of the issue, the effects of pharmaceuticals in the environment are little researched and understood.
But in the research series published Monday, scientists uncover a broad spectrum of impacts.
Wild starlings, exposed to the anti-depressant fluoxetine, undergo changes in behavior and physiology, including shifts in feeding frequency. At the Experimental Lakes Area in northwestern Ontario, Canada, estrogen from birth control pills was found to alter the entire ecosystem of the lake, leading to a decline in trout, an increase in insects, and the elimination of fathead minnows. Another study finds that amphibians, because most of them breed in water, "may therefore be exposed to water-borne pharmaceuticals during critical phases of the reproductive cycle," posing risks to fertility.
Researchers Anette Kuster and Nicole Adler, of Germany's Federal Environment Agency, point out, "For human medicinal products, hormones, antibiotics, analgesics, antidepressants and antineoplastics indicated an environmental risk. For veterinary products, hormones, antibiotics and parasiticides were most often discussed as being environmentally relevant."
They argue that more research and regulation is needed: "In order to minimize the quantity of pharmaceuticals in the environment [legislation and research] should aim to (i) improve the existing legislation for pharmaceuticals, (ii) prioritize pharmaceuticals in the environment and (iii) improve the availability and collection of pharmaceutical data."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
What happens when the drugs used to treat humans and animals are disposed? Scientific studies published Monday in a special issue of the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B reveal that pharmaceuticals, when flushed into land and water ecosystems, could pose risks to wildlife, from altering species' behavior to changing fertility rates to death.
Pharmaceuticals can enter wild environments through a variety of routes, including dumping from drug manufacturers, as well as sewage.
"Global pharmaceutical consumption is rising with the growing and aging human population and more intensive food production," write Kathryn E. Arnold of the University of York in the UK and colleagues. "Recent studies have revealed pharmaceutical residues in a wide range of ecosystems and organisms." Despite the scope of the issue, the effects of pharmaceuticals in the environment are little researched and understood.
But in the research series published Monday, scientists uncover a broad spectrum of impacts.
Wild starlings, exposed to the anti-depressant fluoxetine, undergo changes in behavior and physiology, including shifts in feeding frequency. At the Experimental Lakes Area in northwestern Ontario, Canada, estrogen from birth control pills was found to alter the entire ecosystem of the lake, leading to a decline in trout, an increase in insects, and the elimination of fathead minnows. Another study finds that amphibians, because most of them breed in water, "may therefore be exposed to water-borne pharmaceuticals during critical phases of the reproductive cycle," posing risks to fertility.
Researchers Anette Kuster and Nicole Adler, of Germany's Federal Environment Agency, point out, "For human medicinal products, hormones, antibiotics, analgesics, antidepressants and antineoplastics indicated an environmental risk. For veterinary products, hormones, antibiotics and parasiticides were most often discussed as being environmentally relevant."
They argue that more research and regulation is needed: "In order to minimize the quantity of pharmaceuticals in the environment [legislation and research] should aim to (i) improve the existing legislation for pharmaceuticals, (ii) prioritize pharmaceuticals in the environment and (iii) improve the availability and collection of pharmaceutical data."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.