SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
State Commissioner: If You Oppose Fracking in North Carolina, Your Comment "Doesn't Count"
“About half are repetitive ‘don’t frack’ comments,” said Commissioner James Womack. “They don’t really count, if you know what I mean.”
Oct 11, 2014
As North Caroline makes plans to open itself up to hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, public comments are pouring into the Mining and Energy Commission as it prepares to make recommendations to lawmakers about the safety guidelines that should govern the controversial gas drilling in the state.
However, for those telling the commission that fracking shouldn't be approved at all--that there are no amount of safety measures that could curtail the threats from the inherently destructive practice--at least one of the members of the commission, James Womack, has a message in return: Those comments don't count.
According to the News & Observer, of the more than 100,000 that have so far come in expressing input on fracking, approximately half declare support for an outright ban on the controversial drilling that uses enormous amounts of water, sand, and a secret stew of toxic chemicals to obtain gas trapped in shale formations beneath the surface.
And while the commission is charged with accepting and cataloging those public comments, Womack told the newspaper that what he considered "substantive, detailed comments" have been a fraction of the total, but that many more contained general opposition to fracking which he said were not "helpful" to the commission's work.
"About half are repetitive 'don't frack' comments," Womack said. "They don't really count, if you know what I mean."
Beyond an outright ban, many residents in North Carolina have specifically expressed worry about the fracking industry's desire to use so-called "open pits" to store toxic waste-water produced during the drilling process.
Last month, the Center for Biology Diversity blasted North Carolina's process of deliberation around fracking and said the state's rules--as currently proposed--put the people, water, and wildlife of the state at grave risk.
On Saturday, anti-fracking activists from around the world are participating in what they'd dubbed a "Global Frackdown" calling for a moratorium on fracking and demanding that governments at the international, national, and local level respond aggressively to the growing body of evidence that shows that natural gas is neither a "clean" form of energy nor one that can in any way help address the global water crisis or the threat posed by global warming and climate change.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As North Caroline makes plans to open itself up to hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, public comments are pouring into the Mining and Energy Commission as it prepares to make recommendations to lawmakers about the safety guidelines that should govern the controversial gas drilling in the state.
However, for those telling the commission that fracking shouldn't be approved at all--that there are no amount of safety measures that could curtail the threats from the inherently destructive practice--at least one of the members of the commission, James Womack, has a message in return: Those comments don't count.
According to the News & Observer, of the more than 100,000 that have so far come in expressing input on fracking, approximately half declare support for an outright ban on the controversial drilling that uses enormous amounts of water, sand, and a secret stew of toxic chemicals to obtain gas trapped in shale formations beneath the surface.
And while the commission is charged with accepting and cataloging those public comments, Womack told the newspaper that what he considered "substantive, detailed comments" have been a fraction of the total, but that many more contained general opposition to fracking which he said were not "helpful" to the commission's work.
"About half are repetitive 'don't frack' comments," Womack said. "They don't really count, if you know what I mean."
Beyond an outright ban, many residents in North Carolina have specifically expressed worry about the fracking industry's desire to use so-called "open pits" to store toxic waste-water produced during the drilling process.
Last month, the Center for Biology Diversity blasted North Carolina's process of deliberation around fracking and said the state's rules--as currently proposed--put the people, water, and wildlife of the state at grave risk.
On Saturday, anti-fracking activists from around the world are participating in what they'd dubbed a "Global Frackdown" calling for a moratorium on fracking and demanding that governments at the international, national, and local level respond aggressively to the growing body of evidence that shows that natural gas is neither a "clean" form of energy nor one that can in any way help address the global water crisis or the threat posed by global warming and climate change.
As North Caroline makes plans to open itself up to hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, public comments are pouring into the Mining and Energy Commission as it prepares to make recommendations to lawmakers about the safety guidelines that should govern the controversial gas drilling in the state.
However, for those telling the commission that fracking shouldn't be approved at all--that there are no amount of safety measures that could curtail the threats from the inherently destructive practice--at least one of the members of the commission, James Womack, has a message in return: Those comments don't count.
According to the News & Observer, of the more than 100,000 that have so far come in expressing input on fracking, approximately half declare support for an outright ban on the controversial drilling that uses enormous amounts of water, sand, and a secret stew of toxic chemicals to obtain gas trapped in shale formations beneath the surface.
And while the commission is charged with accepting and cataloging those public comments, Womack told the newspaper that what he considered "substantive, detailed comments" have been a fraction of the total, but that many more contained general opposition to fracking which he said were not "helpful" to the commission's work.
"About half are repetitive 'don't frack' comments," Womack said. "They don't really count, if you know what I mean."
Beyond an outright ban, many residents in North Carolina have specifically expressed worry about the fracking industry's desire to use so-called "open pits" to store toxic waste-water produced during the drilling process.
Last month, the Center for Biology Diversity blasted North Carolina's process of deliberation around fracking and said the state's rules--as currently proposed--put the people, water, and wildlife of the state at grave risk.
On Saturday, anti-fracking activists from around the world are participating in what they'd dubbed a "Global Frackdown" calling for a moratorium on fracking and demanding that governments at the international, national, and local level respond aggressively to the growing body of evidence that shows that natural gas is neither a "clean" form of energy nor one that can in any way help address the global water crisis or the threat posed by global warming and climate change.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.