SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In Wisconsin and Texas, Courts Deliver Victories for Voting Rights
U.S. Supreme Court blocks Wisconsin voter ID law, while a federal trial court in Texas strikes down that state’s ID law
Oct 10, 2014
In a 6-3 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday evening blocked Wisconsin from implementing a voter ID law that would have required voters to provide photo identification before casting their ballots in the coming election.
The Court, which recently allowed North Carolina officials to eliminate same-day voter registration and discount votes cast mistakenly in the wrong precincts, did not consider the merits of the Wisconsin case, but rather vacated a Seventh Circuit appeals court order from mid-September that allowed state officials to implement the law as the case proceeds through the courts.
Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen said he would seek ways to reinstate the law, which Governor Scott Walker and fellow Republicans approved in 2011, within the month--in other words, before Election Day.
But critics of the law said it would create chaos because the state would not be able to train poll workers, inform voters, and distribute IDs to those who would need them to vote.
"Today's order puts the brakes on the last-minute disruption and voter chaos created by this law going into effect so close to the election," said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project. "It will help safeguard the vote for thousands of Wisconsinites as this case makes its way through the courts."
Also Thursday, a federal trial court in Texas struck down that state's ID law, saying it put a disproportionate burden on African American and Hispanic voters and calling the law an "unconstitutional poll tax."
U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos ruled that the law--passed by Texas legislators, signed by Republican Governor Rick Perry, and decried as one of the strictest in the nation--took an "unorthodox" approach that legislators knew would have a disparate impact on minority voters. The law requires voters to produce government-issued identification before casting a ballot. Concealed handgun permits are accepted, while college student IDs are not.
The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which is co-representing the plaintiffs in the case, called the ruling "momentous."
"Texas adopted its racially discriminatory photo ID law in response to the substantial and ongoing growth of Black and Latino communities in Texas," said Natasha M. Korgaonkar, who argued at the trial and is assistant counsel in the Political Participation Group of NAACP Legal Defense Fund. "This growth presented Texas with an important opportunity to welcome its rich diversity by expanding its electorate; Texas instead chose to intentionally erect one of the nation's strictest photo ID laws to minimize the growing political power of voters of color in Texas. Fortunately, the Court's ruling today prevented that result."
The Texas attorney general's office quickly stated that it would appeal the decision.
A report released earlier this week showed voter ID laws are "intended to discourage voting," especially among young, new, and minority voters.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
In a 6-3 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday evening blocked Wisconsin from implementing a voter ID law that would have required voters to provide photo identification before casting their ballots in the coming election.
The Court, which recently allowed North Carolina officials to eliminate same-day voter registration and discount votes cast mistakenly in the wrong precincts, did not consider the merits of the Wisconsin case, but rather vacated a Seventh Circuit appeals court order from mid-September that allowed state officials to implement the law as the case proceeds through the courts.
Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen said he would seek ways to reinstate the law, which Governor Scott Walker and fellow Republicans approved in 2011, within the month--in other words, before Election Day.
But critics of the law said it would create chaos because the state would not be able to train poll workers, inform voters, and distribute IDs to those who would need them to vote.
"Today's order puts the brakes on the last-minute disruption and voter chaos created by this law going into effect so close to the election," said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project. "It will help safeguard the vote for thousands of Wisconsinites as this case makes its way through the courts."
Also Thursday, a federal trial court in Texas struck down that state's ID law, saying it put a disproportionate burden on African American and Hispanic voters and calling the law an "unconstitutional poll tax."
U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos ruled that the law--passed by Texas legislators, signed by Republican Governor Rick Perry, and decried as one of the strictest in the nation--took an "unorthodox" approach that legislators knew would have a disparate impact on minority voters. The law requires voters to produce government-issued identification before casting a ballot. Concealed handgun permits are accepted, while college student IDs are not.
The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which is co-representing the plaintiffs in the case, called the ruling "momentous."
"Texas adopted its racially discriminatory photo ID law in response to the substantial and ongoing growth of Black and Latino communities in Texas," said Natasha M. Korgaonkar, who argued at the trial and is assistant counsel in the Political Participation Group of NAACP Legal Defense Fund. "This growth presented Texas with an important opportunity to welcome its rich diversity by expanding its electorate; Texas instead chose to intentionally erect one of the nation's strictest photo ID laws to minimize the growing political power of voters of color in Texas. Fortunately, the Court's ruling today prevented that result."
The Texas attorney general's office quickly stated that it would appeal the decision.
A report released earlier this week showed voter ID laws are "intended to discourage voting," especially among young, new, and minority voters.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
In a 6-3 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday evening blocked Wisconsin from implementing a voter ID law that would have required voters to provide photo identification before casting their ballots in the coming election.
The Court, which recently allowed North Carolina officials to eliminate same-day voter registration and discount votes cast mistakenly in the wrong precincts, did not consider the merits of the Wisconsin case, but rather vacated a Seventh Circuit appeals court order from mid-September that allowed state officials to implement the law as the case proceeds through the courts.
Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen said he would seek ways to reinstate the law, which Governor Scott Walker and fellow Republicans approved in 2011, within the month--in other words, before Election Day.
But critics of the law said it would create chaos because the state would not be able to train poll workers, inform voters, and distribute IDs to those who would need them to vote.
"Today's order puts the brakes on the last-minute disruption and voter chaos created by this law going into effect so close to the election," said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project. "It will help safeguard the vote for thousands of Wisconsinites as this case makes its way through the courts."
Also Thursday, a federal trial court in Texas struck down that state's ID law, saying it put a disproportionate burden on African American and Hispanic voters and calling the law an "unconstitutional poll tax."
U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos ruled that the law--passed by Texas legislators, signed by Republican Governor Rick Perry, and decried as one of the strictest in the nation--took an "unorthodox" approach that legislators knew would have a disparate impact on minority voters. The law requires voters to produce government-issued identification before casting a ballot. Concealed handgun permits are accepted, while college student IDs are not.
The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which is co-representing the plaintiffs in the case, called the ruling "momentous."
"Texas adopted its racially discriminatory photo ID law in response to the substantial and ongoing growth of Black and Latino communities in Texas," said Natasha M. Korgaonkar, who argued at the trial and is assistant counsel in the Political Participation Group of NAACP Legal Defense Fund. "This growth presented Texas with an important opportunity to welcome its rich diversity by expanding its electorate; Texas instead chose to intentionally erect one of the nation's strictest photo ID laws to minimize the growing political power of voters of color in Texas. Fortunately, the Court's ruling today prevented that result."
The Texas attorney general's office quickly stated that it would appeal the decision.
A report released earlier this week showed voter ID laws are "intended to discourage voting," especially among young, new, and minority voters.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.