

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Michael Chertoff, the former head of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under the Bush administration, has been paid a "modest sum" by a Virginia-based company trying to retain a profitable government contract for routing millions of phone calls and texts in and out of the country, the New York Times reports on Monday.
According to the reporting, Chertoff wrote an extensive report on behalf of the Neustar corporation, arguing that a proposal to give its lucrative government contract to a foreign-owed telecom company would threaten national security by exposing sensitive information to "unwarranted, and potentially harmful" access by adversaries. The contracting decision is now before the FCC, with preliminary reports suggesting the contract could go to an American subsidiary of the Swedish-owned Ericsson company.
Especially in the wake of surveillance revelations made possible by NSA documents leaked by whistleblower Edward Snowden, the Times reports that the "battle over the little-known routing network reflects the central role that the phone companies play in the government's surveillance and phone-tracing capabilities."
The role of Chertoff, however, also reflects the role of former high-level government officials who have gone on to play pivotal and very profitable roles when it comes to the business side of the national security state. In fact, without Chertoff playing his paid role as consultant and lobbyist, it's unlikely the story would ever have made it to the front page of the Times.
In essence, Chertoff is allowed to leverage his credentials as a former public servant alongside "insider" expertise as someone who once oversaw vast aspects of the government's foreign and domestic intelligence programs. Whether valid or not, those claims are inherently profitable to his employer -- in this case, Neustar, who would make many millions of dollars if their contract is renewed.
In addition to making sure the widely read paper had an "advance copy of his report," Chertoff's former role at DHS makes his dire warnings about national security threats relevant to news editors.
The Times reports:
In a 45-page report that Neustar plans to send to the F.C.C. this week, Mr. Chertoff, now a private consultant, argues that national security concerns have been slighted in the contracting process. An advance copy of his report was provided to The New York Times.
Without a fuller assessment of the risks posed in switching the contract to a European-based outfit, "security would become obsolete in the face of constantly morphing threats," Mr. Chertoff says in the report.
If a foreign intelligence service were to gain access to the phone-routing system and identify the targets of United States surveillance efforts, Mr. Chertoff said, "that would be a counterintelligence bonanza for adversaries of the nation and a security disaster for the United States."
However, immediately following Monday's story in the Times, independent journalist Tim Shorrock took to Twitter to ask important questions raised by Chertoff's role in the Neustar case. Shorrock tweeted:
And another independent journalist, Kevin Gosztola, summarized his assessment of the story by tweeting:
This isn't the first time Chertoff has given the appearance of playing national security fears towards his own benefit. In 2010, amidst elevated concerns surrounding airport security in the wake of a failed bombing of a commercial airliner over Detroit, Chertoff was noted for publicly pushing the need for more drastic airport security, including a massive rollout of full-body scanners. Filings revealed that Chertoff's consulting firm, the Chertoff Group, was paid by several companies that manufactured these scanners, though his ties to these firms were seldom pointed out or acknowdledged during his public appearances. Instead, he was often cited simply as "former Secretary of Homeland Security."
As the Huffington Post reported at the time:
Chertoff's role has been strongly criticized by passenger right advocate Kate Hanni, the founder of FlyersRights.org, who opposes the use of the scanners on privacy and health grounds, citing government studies about radiation exposure.
"They're trying to scare the pants off the American people that we need these things," Hanni told The Huffington Post. "When Chertoff goes on TV, he is basically promoting his clients and exploiting that fear to make money. Fear is a commodity and they're selling it. The more they can sell it, the more we buy into it. When American people are afraid, they will accept anything."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Michael Chertoff, the former head of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under the Bush administration, has been paid a "modest sum" by a Virginia-based company trying to retain a profitable government contract for routing millions of phone calls and texts in and out of the country, the New York Times reports on Monday.
According to the reporting, Chertoff wrote an extensive report on behalf of the Neustar corporation, arguing that a proposal to give its lucrative government contract to a foreign-owed telecom company would threaten national security by exposing sensitive information to "unwarranted, and potentially harmful" access by adversaries. The contracting decision is now before the FCC, with preliminary reports suggesting the contract could go to an American subsidiary of the Swedish-owned Ericsson company.
Especially in the wake of surveillance revelations made possible by NSA documents leaked by whistleblower Edward Snowden, the Times reports that the "battle over the little-known routing network reflects the central role that the phone companies play in the government's surveillance and phone-tracing capabilities."
The role of Chertoff, however, also reflects the role of former high-level government officials who have gone on to play pivotal and very profitable roles when it comes to the business side of the national security state. In fact, without Chertoff playing his paid role as consultant and lobbyist, it's unlikely the story would ever have made it to the front page of the Times.
In essence, Chertoff is allowed to leverage his credentials as a former public servant alongside "insider" expertise as someone who once oversaw vast aspects of the government's foreign and domestic intelligence programs. Whether valid or not, those claims are inherently profitable to his employer -- in this case, Neustar, who would make many millions of dollars if their contract is renewed.
In addition to making sure the widely read paper had an "advance copy of his report," Chertoff's former role at DHS makes his dire warnings about national security threats relevant to news editors.
The Times reports:
In a 45-page report that Neustar plans to send to the F.C.C. this week, Mr. Chertoff, now a private consultant, argues that national security concerns have been slighted in the contracting process. An advance copy of his report was provided to The New York Times.
Without a fuller assessment of the risks posed in switching the contract to a European-based outfit, "security would become obsolete in the face of constantly morphing threats," Mr. Chertoff says in the report.
If a foreign intelligence service were to gain access to the phone-routing system and identify the targets of United States surveillance efforts, Mr. Chertoff said, "that would be a counterintelligence bonanza for adversaries of the nation and a security disaster for the United States."
However, immediately following Monday's story in the Times, independent journalist Tim Shorrock took to Twitter to ask important questions raised by Chertoff's role in the Neustar case. Shorrock tweeted:
And another independent journalist, Kevin Gosztola, summarized his assessment of the story by tweeting:
This isn't the first time Chertoff has given the appearance of playing national security fears towards his own benefit. In 2010, amidst elevated concerns surrounding airport security in the wake of a failed bombing of a commercial airliner over Detroit, Chertoff was noted for publicly pushing the need for more drastic airport security, including a massive rollout of full-body scanners. Filings revealed that Chertoff's consulting firm, the Chertoff Group, was paid by several companies that manufactured these scanners, though his ties to these firms were seldom pointed out or acknowdledged during his public appearances. Instead, he was often cited simply as "former Secretary of Homeland Security."
As the Huffington Post reported at the time:
Chertoff's role has been strongly criticized by passenger right advocate Kate Hanni, the founder of FlyersRights.org, who opposes the use of the scanners on privacy and health grounds, citing government studies about radiation exposure.
"They're trying to scare the pants off the American people that we need these things," Hanni told The Huffington Post. "When Chertoff goes on TV, he is basically promoting his clients and exploiting that fear to make money. Fear is a commodity and they're selling it. The more they can sell it, the more we buy into it. When American people are afraid, they will accept anything."
Michael Chertoff, the former head of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under the Bush administration, has been paid a "modest sum" by a Virginia-based company trying to retain a profitable government contract for routing millions of phone calls and texts in and out of the country, the New York Times reports on Monday.
According to the reporting, Chertoff wrote an extensive report on behalf of the Neustar corporation, arguing that a proposal to give its lucrative government contract to a foreign-owed telecom company would threaten national security by exposing sensitive information to "unwarranted, and potentially harmful" access by adversaries. The contracting decision is now before the FCC, with preliminary reports suggesting the contract could go to an American subsidiary of the Swedish-owned Ericsson company.
Especially in the wake of surveillance revelations made possible by NSA documents leaked by whistleblower Edward Snowden, the Times reports that the "battle over the little-known routing network reflects the central role that the phone companies play in the government's surveillance and phone-tracing capabilities."
The role of Chertoff, however, also reflects the role of former high-level government officials who have gone on to play pivotal and very profitable roles when it comes to the business side of the national security state. In fact, without Chertoff playing his paid role as consultant and lobbyist, it's unlikely the story would ever have made it to the front page of the Times.
In essence, Chertoff is allowed to leverage his credentials as a former public servant alongside "insider" expertise as someone who once oversaw vast aspects of the government's foreign and domestic intelligence programs. Whether valid or not, those claims are inherently profitable to his employer -- in this case, Neustar, who would make many millions of dollars if their contract is renewed.
In addition to making sure the widely read paper had an "advance copy of his report," Chertoff's former role at DHS makes his dire warnings about national security threats relevant to news editors.
The Times reports:
In a 45-page report that Neustar plans to send to the F.C.C. this week, Mr. Chertoff, now a private consultant, argues that national security concerns have been slighted in the contracting process. An advance copy of his report was provided to The New York Times.
Without a fuller assessment of the risks posed in switching the contract to a European-based outfit, "security would become obsolete in the face of constantly morphing threats," Mr. Chertoff says in the report.
If a foreign intelligence service were to gain access to the phone-routing system and identify the targets of United States surveillance efforts, Mr. Chertoff said, "that would be a counterintelligence bonanza for adversaries of the nation and a security disaster for the United States."
However, immediately following Monday's story in the Times, independent journalist Tim Shorrock took to Twitter to ask important questions raised by Chertoff's role in the Neustar case. Shorrock tweeted:
And another independent journalist, Kevin Gosztola, summarized his assessment of the story by tweeting:
This isn't the first time Chertoff has given the appearance of playing national security fears towards his own benefit. In 2010, amidst elevated concerns surrounding airport security in the wake of a failed bombing of a commercial airliner over Detroit, Chertoff was noted for publicly pushing the need for more drastic airport security, including a massive rollout of full-body scanners. Filings revealed that Chertoff's consulting firm, the Chertoff Group, was paid by several companies that manufactured these scanners, though his ties to these firms were seldom pointed out or acknowdledged during his public appearances. Instead, he was often cited simply as "former Secretary of Homeland Security."
As the Huffington Post reported at the time:
Chertoff's role has been strongly criticized by passenger right advocate Kate Hanni, the founder of FlyersRights.org, who opposes the use of the scanners on privacy and health grounds, citing government studies about radiation exposure.
"They're trying to scare the pants off the American people that we need these things," Hanni told The Huffington Post. "When Chertoff goes on TV, he is basically promoting his clients and exploiting that fear to make money. Fear is a commodity and they're selling it. The more they can sell it, the more we buy into it. When American people are afraid, they will accept anything."