

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Michael Chertoff, the former head of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under the Bush administration, has been paid a "modest sum" by a Virginia-based company trying to retain a profitable government contract for routing millions of phone calls and texts in and out of the country, the New York Times reports on Monday.
According to the reporting, Chertoff wrote an extensive report on behalf of the Neustar corporation, arguing that a proposal to give its lucrative government contract to a foreign-owed telecom company would threaten national security by exposing sensitive information to "unwarranted, and potentially harmful" access by adversaries. The contracting decision is now before the FCC, with preliminary reports suggesting the contract could go to an American subsidiary of the Swedish-owned Ericsson company.
Especially in the wake of surveillance revelations made possible by NSA documents leaked by whistleblower Edward Snowden, the Times reports that the "battle over the little-known routing network reflects the central role that the phone companies play in the government's surveillance and phone-tracing capabilities."
The role of Chertoff, however, also reflects the role of former high-level government officials who have gone on to play pivotal and very profitable roles when it comes to the business side of the national security state. In fact, without Chertoff playing his paid role as consultant and lobbyist, it's unlikely the story would ever have made it to the front page of the Times.
In essence, Chertoff is allowed to leverage his credentials as a former public servant alongside "insider" expertise as someone who once oversaw vast aspects of the government's foreign and domestic intelligence programs. Whether valid or not, those claims are inherently profitable to his employer -- in this case, Neustar, who would make many millions of dollars if their contract is renewed.
In addition to making sure the widely read paper had an "advance copy of his report," Chertoff's former role at DHS makes his dire warnings about national security threats relevant to news editors.
The Times reports:
In a 45-page report that Neustar plans to send to the F.C.C. this week, Mr. Chertoff, now a private consultant, argues that national security concerns have been slighted in the contracting process. An advance copy of his report was provided to The New York Times.
Without a fuller assessment of the risks posed in switching the contract to a European-based outfit, "security would become obsolete in the face of constantly morphing threats," Mr. Chertoff says in the report.
If a foreign intelligence service were to gain access to the phone-routing system and identify the targets of United States surveillance efforts, Mr. Chertoff said, "that would be a counterintelligence bonanza for adversaries of the nation and a security disaster for the United States."
However, immediately following Monday's story in the Times, independent journalist Tim Shorrock took to Twitter to ask important questions raised by Chertoff's role in the Neustar case. Shorrock tweeted:
And another independent journalist, Kevin Gosztola, summarized his assessment of the story by tweeting:
This isn't the first time Chertoff has given the appearance of playing national security fears towards his own benefit. In 2010, amidst elevated concerns surrounding airport security in the wake of a failed bombing of a commercial airliner over Detroit, Chertoff was noted for publicly pushing the need for more drastic airport security, including a massive rollout of full-body scanners. Filings revealed that Chertoff's consulting firm, the Chertoff Group, was paid by several companies that manufactured these scanners, though his ties to these firms were seldom pointed out or acknowdledged during his public appearances. Instead, he was often cited simply as "former Secretary of Homeland Security."
As the Huffington Post reported at the time:
Chertoff's role has been strongly criticized by passenger right advocate Kate Hanni, the founder of FlyersRights.org, who opposes the use of the scanners on privacy and health grounds, citing government studies about radiation exposure.
"They're trying to scare the pants off the American people that we need these things," Hanni told The Huffington Post. "When Chertoff goes on TV, he is basically promoting his clients and exploiting that fear to make money. Fear is a commodity and they're selling it. The more they can sell it, the more we buy into it. When American people are afraid, they will accept anything."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Michael Chertoff, the former head of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under the Bush administration, has been paid a "modest sum" by a Virginia-based company trying to retain a profitable government contract for routing millions of phone calls and texts in and out of the country, the New York Times reports on Monday.
According to the reporting, Chertoff wrote an extensive report on behalf of the Neustar corporation, arguing that a proposal to give its lucrative government contract to a foreign-owed telecom company would threaten national security by exposing sensitive information to "unwarranted, and potentially harmful" access by adversaries. The contracting decision is now before the FCC, with preliminary reports suggesting the contract could go to an American subsidiary of the Swedish-owned Ericsson company.
Especially in the wake of surveillance revelations made possible by NSA documents leaked by whistleblower Edward Snowden, the Times reports that the "battle over the little-known routing network reflects the central role that the phone companies play in the government's surveillance and phone-tracing capabilities."
The role of Chertoff, however, also reflects the role of former high-level government officials who have gone on to play pivotal and very profitable roles when it comes to the business side of the national security state. In fact, without Chertoff playing his paid role as consultant and lobbyist, it's unlikely the story would ever have made it to the front page of the Times.
In essence, Chertoff is allowed to leverage his credentials as a former public servant alongside "insider" expertise as someone who once oversaw vast aspects of the government's foreign and domestic intelligence programs. Whether valid or not, those claims are inherently profitable to his employer -- in this case, Neustar, who would make many millions of dollars if their contract is renewed.
In addition to making sure the widely read paper had an "advance copy of his report," Chertoff's former role at DHS makes his dire warnings about national security threats relevant to news editors.
The Times reports:
In a 45-page report that Neustar plans to send to the F.C.C. this week, Mr. Chertoff, now a private consultant, argues that national security concerns have been slighted in the contracting process. An advance copy of his report was provided to The New York Times.
Without a fuller assessment of the risks posed in switching the contract to a European-based outfit, "security would become obsolete in the face of constantly morphing threats," Mr. Chertoff says in the report.
If a foreign intelligence service were to gain access to the phone-routing system and identify the targets of United States surveillance efforts, Mr. Chertoff said, "that would be a counterintelligence bonanza for adversaries of the nation and a security disaster for the United States."
However, immediately following Monday's story in the Times, independent journalist Tim Shorrock took to Twitter to ask important questions raised by Chertoff's role in the Neustar case. Shorrock tweeted:
And another independent journalist, Kevin Gosztola, summarized his assessment of the story by tweeting:
This isn't the first time Chertoff has given the appearance of playing national security fears towards his own benefit. In 2010, amidst elevated concerns surrounding airport security in the wake of a failed bombing of a commercial airliner over Detroit, Chertoff was noted for publicly pushing the need for more drastic airport security, including a massive rollout of full-body scanners. Filings revealed that Chertoff's consulting firm, the Chertoff Group, was paid by several companies that manufactured these scanners, though his ties to these firms were seldom pointed out or acknowdledged during his public appearances. Instead, he was often cited simply as "former Secretary of Homeland Security."
As the Huffington Post reported at the time:
Chertoff's role has been strongly criticized by passenger right advocate Kate Hanni, the founder of FlyersRights.org, who opposes the use of the scanners on privacy and health grounds, citing government studies about radiation exposure.
"They're trying to scare the pants off the American people that we need these things," Hanni told The Huffington Post. "When Chertoff goes on TV, he is basically promoting his clients and exploiting that fear to make money. Fear is a commodity and they're selling it. The more they can sell it, the more we buy into it. When American people are afraid, they will accept anything."
Michael Chertoff, the former head of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under the Bush administration, has been paid a "modest sum" by a Virginia-based company trying to retain a profitable government contract for routing millions of phone calls and texts in and out of the country, the New York Times reports on Monday.
According to the reporting, Chertoff wrote an extensive report on behalf of the Neustar corporation, arguing that a proposal to give its lucrative government contract to a foreign-owed telecom company would threaten national security by exposing sensitive information to "unwarranted, and potentially harmful" access by adversaries. The contracting decision is now before the FCC, with preliminary reports suggesting the contract could go to an American subsidiary of the Swedish-owned Ericsson company.
Especially in the wake of surveillance revelations made possible by NSA documents leaked by whistleblower Edward Snowden, the Times reports that the "battle over the little-known routing network reflects the central role that the phone companies play in the government's surveillance and phone-tracing capabilities."
The role of Chertoff, however, also reflects the role of former high-level government officials who have gone on to play pivotal and very profitable roles when it comes to the business side of the national security state. In fact, without Chertoff playing his paid role as consultant and lobbyist, it's unlikely the story would ever have made it to the front page of the Times.
In essence, Chertoff is allowed to leverage his credentials as a former public servant alongside "insider" expertise as someone who once oversaw vast aspects of the government's foreign and domestic intelligence programs. Whether valid or not, those claims are inherently profitable to his employer -- in this case, Neustar, who would make many millions of dollars if their contract is renewed.
In addition to making sure the widely read paper had an "advance copy of his report," Chertoff's former role at DHS makes his dire warnings about national security threats relevant to news editors.
The Times reports:
In a 45-page report that Neustar plans to send to the F.C.C. this week, Mr. Chertoff, now a private consultant, argues that national security concerns have been slighted in the contracting process. An advance copy of his report was provided to The New York Times.
Without a fuller assessment of the risks posed in switching the contract to a European-based outfit, "security would become obsolete in the face of constantly morphing threats," Mr. Chertoff says in the report.
If a foreign intelligence service were to gain access to the phone-routing system and identify the targets of United States surveillance efforts, Mr. Chertoff said, "that would be a counterintelligence bonanza for adversaries of the nation and a security disaster for the United States."
However, immediately following Monday's story in the Times, independent journalist Tim Shorrock took to Twitter to ask important questions raised by Chertoff's role in the Neustar case. Shorrock tweeted:
And another independent journalist, Kevin Gosztola, summarized his assessment of the story by tweeting:
This isn't the first time Chertoff has given the appearance of playing national security fears towards his own benefit. In 2010, amidst elevated concerns surrounding airport security in the wake of a failed bombing of a commercial airliner over Detroit, Chertoff was noted for publicly pushing the need for more drastic airport security, including a massive rollout of full-body scanners. Filings revealed that Chertoff's consulting firm, the Chertoff Group, was paid by several companies that manufactured these scanners, though his ties to these firms were seldom pointed out or acknowdledged during his public appearances. Instead, he was often cited simply as "former Secretary of Homeland Security."
As the Huffington Post reported at the time:
Chertoff's role has been strongly criticized by passenger right advocate Kate Hanni, the founder of FlyersRights.org, who opposes the use of the scanners on privacy and health grounds, citing government studies about radiation exposure.
"They're trying to scare the pants off the American people that we need these things," Hanni told The Huffington Post. "When Chertoff goes on TV, he is basically promoting his clients and exploiting that fear to make money. Fear is a commodity and they're selling it. The more they can sell it, the more we buy into it. When American people are afraid, they will accept anything."