

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
An 'acid fracking' operation near the Everglades in south Florida has generated a court battle, protests, and outrage among the public and elected officials alike, with community members and county commissioners accusing state regulators of not doing enough to protect public health and the environment.
The process of acid fracking, according to Clean Water Action, "involves injecting high volumes of hydrochloric or hydrofluoric acids to corrode the geology and bring oil or gas to the surface. Like [hydraulic] fracking, it is a heavily industrialized process, using high volumes of water and chemicals."
Rather than fracturing rock, acid fracking actually dissolves limestone, dolomite, and calcite, according to Rigzone, a trade publication for the oil and gas industry. Also known as 'acidizing' or 'acid stimulation,' limited study of the procedure leaves the level and nature of the risks unknown.
In Florida, the Texas-based Dan A. Hughes oil company engaged in acid fracking without permission--the first time the process had been used in the state--and continued to do so even after the state issued a cease and desist order to allow time to test groundwater for possible contamination.
Following legal wrangling between Collier County commissioners and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), the state began testing groundwater near the Hughes site last week.
On Wednesday, FDEP secretary Herschel T. Vinyard Jr. announced in a statement: "Today's results further confirm that contamination in the area is highly unlikely."
Residents and environmental activists are not reassured.
"Since the six monitoring wells only went down thirteen feet, the testing would only have been adequate to establish that no significant surface spillage had occurred at the well site," the group Preserve Our Paradise said on its website. "However we cannot even reach this conclusion because nearly six months have passed since the fracking operation took place."
In addition, PoP points out that the FDEP didn't test for all the chemicals that may have been present as part of the extraction process. "Put on your waders, the B.S. is now waist deep," declared a post on the PoP Facebook page.
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
An 'acid fracking' operation near the Everglades in south Florida has generated a court battle, protests, and outrage among the public and elected officials alike, with community members and county commissioners accusing state regulators of not doing enough to protect public health and the environment.
The process of acid fracking, according to Clean Water Action, "involves injecting high volumes of hydrochloric or hydrofluoric acids to corrode the geology and bring oil or gas to the surface. Like [hydraulic] fracking, it is a heavily industrialized process, using high volumes of water and chemicals."
Rather than fracturing rock, acid fracking actually dissolves limestone, dolomite, and calcite, according to Rigzone, a trade publication for the oil and gas industry. Also known as 'acidizing' or 'acid stimulation,' limited study of the procedure leaves the level and nature of the risks unknown.
In Florida, the Texas-based Dan A. Hughes oil company engaged in acid fracking without permission--the first time the process had been used in the state--and continued to do so even after the state issued a cease and desist order to allow time to test groundwater for possible contamination.
Following legal wrangling between Collier County commissioners and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), the state began testing groundwater near the Hughes site last week.
On Wednesday, FDEP secretary Herschel T. Vinyard Jr. announced in a statement: "Today's results further confirm that contamination in the area is highly unlikely."
Residents and environmental activists are not reassured.
"Since the six monitoring wells only went down thirteen feet, the testing would only have been adequate to establish that no significant surface spillage had occurred at the well site," the group Preserve Our Paradise said on its website. "However we cannot even reach this conclusion because nearly six months have passed since the fracking operation took place."
In addition, PoP points out that the FDEP didn't test for all the chemicals that may have been present as part of the extraction process. "Put on your waders, the B.S. is now waist deep," declared a post on the PoP Facebook page.
_____________________
An 'acid fracking' operation near the Everglades in south Florida has generated a court battle, protests, and outrage among the public and elected officials alike, with community members and county commissioners accusing state regulators of not doing enough to protect public health and the environment.
The process of acid fracking, according to Clean Water Action, "involves injecting high volumes of hydrochloric or hydrofluoric acids to corrode the geology and bring oil or gas to the surface. Like [hydraulic] fracking, it is a heavily industrialized process, using high volumes of water and chemicals."
Rather than fracturing rock, acid fracking actually dissolves limestone, dolomite, and calcite, according to Rigzone, a trade publication for the oil and gas industry. Also known as 'acidizing' or 'acid stimulation,' limited study of the procedure leaves the level and nature of the risks unknown.
In Florida, the Texas-based Dan A. Hughes oil company engaged in acid fracking without permission--the first time the process had been used in the state--and continued to do so even after the state issued a cease and desist order to allow time to test groundwater for possible contamination.
Following legal wrangling between Collier County commissioners and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), the state began testing groundwater near the Hughes site last week.
On Wednesday, FDEP secretary Herschel T. Vinyard Jr. announced in a statement: "Today's results further confirm that contamination in the area is highly unlikely."
Residents and environmental activists are not reassured.
"Since the six monitoring wells only went down thirteen feet, the testing would only have been adequate to establish that no significant surface spillage had occurred at the well site," the group Preserve Our Paradise said on its website. "However we cannot even reach this conclusion because nearly six months have passed since the fracking operation took place."
In addition, PoP points out that the FDEP didn't test for all the chemicals that may have been present as part of the extraction process. "Put on your waders, the B.S. is now waist deep," declared a post on the PoP Facebook page.
_____________________