

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Steering a lobster boat called the Henry David T., two climate activists on Wednesday attempted to blockade a shipment of West Virginia coal from arriving at Brayton Point Power Station in Massachusetts, New England's largest coal-fired power plant.
The coal freighter, the Energy Entreprise, is believed to be carrying coal from a mountain top removal operation in Appalachia to the terminal in Massachusetts, setting up a 'David vs. Goliath' visual in which the activists in their tiny lobster boat put themselves between the massive coal ship and the power plant's terminal.
Updates from the site indicate that the Henry David T. and its occupants have been detained by the US Coast Guard.

In a statement released by Ken Ward and Jay O'Hara, the two men behind the action--which is operating under the name #coalisstupid--said their blockade at Brayton is a locally-directed action inspired by the international climate activism network 350.org and their "Summer Heat" campaign.
Ward and O'Hara's statement called for Brayton Point to be "shut down immediately." And by "immediately," they said, "We mean today." And offered these reasons:
First, every day of additional emissions is a terrible, immoral imposition on our children and, in ways we do not fully understand, on the other living things of God's creation. Second, we do not need this power plant - efficiency measures alone can reduce demand by far more than the 6% of Massachusetts electricity generation supplied by the plant. Third, in order for the US to exert global leadership on climate, we must take decisive and difficult steps in the right direction for our own nation. The closure of all US coal plants, coupled with the sort of vigorous advancement of efficiencies and renewables that is much talked about but little acted upon, would create the political and moral basis for effective global leadership by the US, without which no global solution is possible.
We are faced with an imperative like none confronted by any previous generation; we are living in a society that is disavows responsibility for this greatest of crises, and lacks any process or means by which decisions, like that to extend the life of Brayton Point, might be affected. It is our choice to take direct, non-violent action - putting our bodies between the Brayton Point coal plant and its water-borne coal supply - in an attempt to achieve the outcome necessary for planetary survival; the immediate closure of Brayton Point Power Station.
Follow the action on Twitter:

______________________________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

Steering a lobster boat called the Henry David T., two climate activists on Wednesday attempted to blockade a shipment of West Virginia coal from arriving at Brayton Point Power Station in Massachusetts, New England's largest coal-fired power plant.
The coal freighter, the Energy Entreprise, is believed to be carrying coal from a mountain top removal operation in Appalachia to the terminal in Massachusetts, setting up a 'David vs. Goliath' visual in which the activists in their tiny lobster boat put themselves between the massive coal ship and the power plant's terminal.
Updates from the site indicate that the Henry David T. and its occupants have been detained by the US Coast Guard.

In a statement released by Ken Ward and Jay O'Hara, the two men behind the action--which is operating under the name #coalisstupid--said their blockade at Brayton is a locally-directed action inspired by the international climate activism network 350.org and their "Summer Heat" campaign.
Ward and O'Hara's statement called for Brayton Point to be "shut down immediately." And by "immediately," they said, "We mean today." And offered these reasons:
First, every day of additional emissions is a terrible, immoral imposition on our children and, in ways we do not fully understand, on the other living things of God's creation. Second, we do not need this power plant - efficiency measures alone can reduce demand by far more than the 6% of Massachusetts electricity generation supplied by the plant. Third, in order for the US to exert global leadership on climate, we must take decisive and difficult steps in the right direction for our own nation. The closure of all US coal plants, coupled with the sort of vigorous advancement of efficiencies and renewables that is much talked about but little acted upon, would create the political and moral basis for effective global leadership by the US, without which no global solution is possible.
We are faced with an imperative like none confronted by any previous generation; we are living in a society that is disavows responsibility for this greatest of crises, and lacks any process or means by which decisions, like that to extend the life of Brayton Point, might be affected. It is our choice to take direct, non-violent action - putting our bodies between the Brayton Point coal plant and its water-borne coal supply - in an attempt to achieve the outcome necessary for planetary survival; the immediate closure of Brayton Point Power Station.
Follow the action on Twitter:

______________________________________

Steering a lobster boat called the Henry David T., two climate activists on Wednesday attempted to blockade a shipment of West Virginia coal from arriving at Brayton Point Power Station in Massachusetts, New England's largest coal-fired power plant.
The coal freighter, the Energy Entreprise, is believed to be carrying coal from a mountain top removal operation in Appalachia to the terminal in Massachusetts, setting up a 'David vs. Goliath' visual in which the activists in their tiny lobster boat put themselves between the massive coal ship and the power plant's terminal.
Updates from the site indicate that the Henry David T. and its occupants have been detained by the US Coast Guard.

In a statement released by Ken Ward and Jay O'Hara, the two men behind the action--which is operating under the name #coalisstupid--said their blockade at Brayton is a locally-directed action inspired by the international climate activism network 350.org and their "Summer Heat" campaign.
Ward and O'Hara's statement called for Brayton Point to be "shut down immediately." And by "immediately," they said, "We mean today." And offered these reasons:
First, every day of additional emissions is a terrible, immoral imposition on our children and, in ways we do not fully understand, on the other living things of God's creation. Second, we do not need this power plant - efficiency measures alone can reduce demand by far more than the 6% of Massachusetts electricity generation supplied by the plant. Third, in order for the US to exert global leadership on climate, we must take decisive and difficult steps in the right direction for our own nation. The closure of all US coal plants, coupled with the sort of vigorous advancement of efficiencies and renewables that is much talked about but little acted upon, would create the political and moral basis for effective global leadership by the US, without which no global solution is possible.
We are faced with an imperative like none confronted by any previous generation; we are living in a society that is disavows responsibility for this greatest of crises, and lacks any process or means by which decisions, like that to extend the life of Brayton Point, might be affected. It is our choice to take direct, non-violent action - putting our bodies between the Brayton Point coal plant and its water-borne coal supply - in an attempt to achieve the outcome necessary for planetary survival; the immediate closure of Brayton Point Power Station.
Follow the action on Twitter:

______________________________________