SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Guantanamo Watchers: Obama Getting Away With Policies Bush Wouldn't Have
Death penalty expert: “There is nothing about this system that the average American... would see as being fair”
Apr 17, 2012
Guantanamo observers say the public has stopped paying attention to the military tribunals for detainees at Guantanamo, and if the policies for the tribunals had been enacted by George W. Bush rather than President Obama, Americans would be outraged.
Bryan Broyles, the Pentagon's deputy chief defense counsel at Guantanamo, told TPM that one aspect that should have Americans furious is allowing death penalty defendants to plead guilty yet still receive the death penalty. Broyles notes that this means the trials are "set up to give someone what appears to be a fair trial with a predetermined result."
Richard Kammen, a death penalty expert representing accused USS Cole attack plotter Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, told TPM there were "huge, huge problems" in the military commissions system.
* * *
TPMMuckraker: Guantanamo Lawyers: Obama Gets Away With Legal Moves Bush Wouldn't Have
More than two years after President Barack Obama blew his self-imposed deadline to shut down the extrajudicial prison at Guantanamo Bay, close observers and defense lawyers with clients making their way through the reformed military tribunal system say the public isn't paying attention.
"I think what you'll find is the interest in the process will never get back up again," Bryan Broyles, the Pentagon's deputy chief defense counsel at Guantanamo, told TPM. "It's fatigue and the thought that 'Well, it must be okay now because Obama said it's okay.'"
Broyles and other observers believe that some policy changes instituted under the Obama administration would have sparked outrage if President George W. Bush was still in the White House. One change he said should have been "extremely alarming" to the legal community: the rule allowing death penalty defendants to plead guilty and still receive the death penalty. [...]
[Richard Kammen, a death penalty expert representing accused USS Cole attack plotter Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri] called the reforms instituted by the Obama administration in 2009 "quite superficial" and said there are "huge, huge problems" in the military commissions system.
"There is nothing about this system that the average American, if they were caught up in it, would see as being fair," Kammen said. "The Republicans have an interest in keeping this process going and the Democrats have an interest, to a certain extent, in not embarrassing Obama."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Guantanamo observers say the public has stopped paying attention to the military tribunals for detainees at Guantanamo, and if the policies for the tribunals had been enacted by George W. Bush rather than President Obama, Americans would be outraged.
Bryan Broyles, the Pentagon's deputy chief defense counsel at Guantanamo, told TPM that one aspect that should have Americans furious is allowing death penalty defendants to plead guilty yet still receive the death penalty. Broyles notes that this means the trials are "set up to give someone what appears to be a fair trial with a predetermined result."
Richard Kammen, a death penalty expert representing accused USS Cole attack plotter Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, told TPM there were "huge, huge problems" in the military commissions system.
* * *
TPMMuckraker: Guantanamo Lawyers: Obama Gets Away With Legal Moves Bush Wouldn't Have
More than two years after President Barack Obama blew his self-imposed deadline to shut down the extrajudicial prison at Guantanamo Bay, close observers and defense lawyers with clients making their way through the reformed military tribunal system say the public isn't paying attention.
"I think what you'll find is the interest in the process will never get back up again," Bryan Broyles, the Pentagon's deputy chief defense counsel at Guantanamo, told TPM. "It's fatigue and the thought that 'Well, it must be okay now because Obama said it's okay.'"
Broyles and other observers believe that some policy changes instituted under the Obama administration would have sparked outrage if President George W. Bush was still in the White House. One change he said should have been "extremely alarming" to the legal community: the rule allowing death penalty defendants to plead guilty and still receive the death penalty. [...]
[Richard Kammen, a death penalty expert representing accused USS Cole attack plotter Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri] called the reforms instituted by the Obama administration in 2009 "quite superficial" and said there are "huge, huge problems" in the military commissions system.
"There is nothing about this system that the average American, if they were caught up in it, would see as being fair," Kammen said. "The Republicans have an interest in keeping this process going and the Democrats have an interest, to a certain extent, in not embarrassing Obama."
Guantanamo observers say the public has stopped paying attention to the military tribunals for detainees at Guantanamo, and if the policies for the tribunals had been enacted by George W. Bush rather than President Obama, Americans would be outraged.
Bryan Broyles, the Pentagon's deputy chief defense counsel at Guantanamo, told TPM that one aspect that should have Americans furious is allowing death penalty defendants to plead guilty yet still receive the death penalty. Broyles notes that this means the trials are "set up to give someone what appears to be a fair trial with a predetermined result."
Richard Kammen, a death penalty expert representing accused USS Cole attack plotter Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, told TPM there were "huge, huge problems" in the military commissions system.
* * *
TPMMuckraker: Guantanamo Lawyers: Obama Gets Away With Legal Moves Bush Wouldn't Have
More than two years after President Barack Obama blew his self-imposed deadline to shut down the extrajudicial prison at Guantanamo Bay, close observers and defense lawyers with clients making their way through the reformed military tribunal system say the public isn't paying attention.
"I think what you'll find is the interest in the process will never get back up again," Bryan Broyles, the Pentagon's deputy chief defense counsel at Guantanamo, told TPM. "It's fatigue and the thought that 'Well, it must be okay now because Obama said it's okay.'"
Broyles and other observers believe that some policy changes instituted under the Obama administration would have sparked outrage if President George W. Bush was still in the White House. One change he said should have been "extremely alarming" to the legal community: the rule allowing death penalty defendants to plead guilty and still receive the death penalty. [...]
[Richard Kammen, a death penalty expert representing accused USS Cole attack plotter Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri] called the reforms instituted by the Obama administration in 2009 "quite superficial" and said there are "huge, huge problems" in the military commissions system.
"There is nothing about this system that the average American, if they were caught up in it, would see as being fair," Kammen said. "The Republicans have an interest in keeping this process going and the Democrats have an interest, to a certain extent, in not embarrassing Obama."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy