Pro-choice demonstrators rally outside the State House during a Pro-Choice Mother's Day Rally in Boston, Massachusetts on May 8, 2022. (Photo: Joseph Prezioso/AFP via Getty Images)
Eve's Choice: Patriarchy No Longer Rules
The passage of Roe v. Wade in 1973 was a direct undoing of the infrastructure of patriarchy: male rule, female submissiveness.
"Then the Lord God said, 'It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.'"--Genesis 2:18. RSV
One chapter later, after Eve was held responsible for the First Sin (Adam, the submissive male, just did what she told him to), we have this:
"To the woman he said, 'I will greatly multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be contrary for your husband, and he shall rule over you.'"--Genesis 3:16
"Women will go ahead and disobey the law. What are they going to do when half the population is in revolt?"
Some people are able to liberate the creation story from its theological misogyny, but for most believers (especially the male ones), it's pretty clear: Women are commanded, indeed, they were created, to do what they're told. This is our cultural infrastructure--a.k.a., the patriarchy--ten thousand or so years in the making.
The prejudice leaps into the New Testament ("Let a woman learn in silence with all submissiveness."--I Timothy 2:11), and on and on. Thirteen hundred years later, here's Thomas Aquinas, high-fiving Aristotle, agreeing that a woman is a "misbegotten male." Jump forward another seven centuries and we get SCOTUS Judge Samuel Alito:
"Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and (Planned Parenthood v. Casey) have enflamed debate and deepened division."
As everyone knows at this point, a woman's right to an abortion--a woman's right to be in full control of her own body--is now in jeopardy. This is a terrifying possibility. If the Supreme Court overthrows Roe v. Wade, the legality of abortion will be decided state by state, and at this point more than half of them are ready to pass legislation turning it back into a crime. Oklahoma, for instance, just passed a law making abortion illegal after about six weeks (when cardiac activity can be detected in the embryo)--with no exceptions for rape or incest.
"Yes, I'm angry," writes Elizabeth Warren. "I'm angry at the justices who deliberately deceived the American people. I'm angry at the Republicans in Congress who stole two Supreme Court seats to get us to this day. And I'm angry at the cruelty of the anti-abortion politicians who will impose enormous pain, suffering, and possible death on people who have the fewest resources to fight back."
The passage of Roe v. Wade in 1973 was a direct undoing of the infrastructure of patriarchy: male rule, female submissiveness. It dug to the core of who we are and began creating change at, perhaps, the deepest level of being human.
Playwright Eve Ensler (also known as V) puts it this way: Overturning Roe "will catalyze and amplify the rightwing misogynist project that is taking away the rights of women everywhere. . . . If we allow the erasure of this central right for women, it will escalate the erasure of them all.
". . . this is not about babies, it is about destroying women's agency and autonomy. And we know that this will most harshly affect the lives of Black and Brown women and marginalized people"--that is to say, those without the resources to travel long distances for an abortion.
In short, this is a complex combo of racism, sexism and God. It's not an issue to be solved with simplistic, "pro-life" self-righteousness. I honor and value all who are truly pro-life--who stand against trillion-dollar military budgets, a nuclear-armed planet, poverty and starvation--but:
". . . these self-styled pro-lifers don't seem to care much about 'life, once a baby is born," Jill Filipovic wrote three years ago at The Guardian, in reference to Donald Trump's supporters. "They want to cut aid to needy children and healthcare to poor mothers and pregnant women. They oppose contraception and sex education--the most effective ways to reduce the abortion rate. Many of them continue to support a president who separates small children from their parents and keeps them in squalid cages."
They saw in Trump, she wrote, "a kindred spirit who would work for their interests--their primary interest being a symbolic reassertion of their cultural dominance."
But cultural--patriarchal--dominance is at the end of its reign, with or without Roe v. Wade. Of course, if the leaked SCOTUS draft holds and Roe is overturned, if legal abortion turns into a patchwork right across the national landscape, chaos will ensue.
"There will be marching, demonstrations, sit-ins, petitions," writes Robin Morgan. "Women will go ahead and disobey the law. What are they going to do when half the population is in revolt? Not 20 percent, not the ultra right wing, not the evangelicals. Women are going to control what happens to our own bodies. No matter how many thousands of us have to go to jail. We are not turning back the clock. No way."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
"Then the Lord God said, 'It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.'"--Genesis 2:18. RSV
One chapter later, after Eve was held responsible for the First Sin (Adam, the submissive male, just did what she told him to), we have this:
"To the woman he said, 'I will greatly multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be contrary for your husband, and he shall rule over you.'"--Genesis 3:16
"Women will go ahead and disobey the law. What are they going to do when half the population is in revolt?"
Some people are able to liberate the creation story from its theological misogyny, but for most believers (especially the male ones), it's pretty clear: Women are commanded, indeed, they were created, to do what they're told. This is our cultural infrastructure--a.k.a., the patriarchy--ten thousand or so years in the making.
The prejudice leaps into the New Testament ("Let a woman learn in silence with all submissiveness."--I Timothy 2:11), and on and on. Thirteen hundred years later, here's Thomas Aquinas, high-fiving Aristotle, agreeing that a woman is a "misbegotten male." Jump forward another seven centuries and we get SCOTUS Judge Samuel Alito:
"Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and (Planned Parenthood v. Casey) have enflamed debate and deepened division."
As everyone knows at this point, a woman's right to an abortion--a woman's right to be in full control of her own body--is now in jeopardy. This is a terrifying possibility. If the Supreme Court overthrows Roe v. Wade, the legality of abortion will be decided state by state, and at this point more than half of them are ready to pass legislation turning it back into a crime. Oklahoma, for instance, just passed a law making abortion illegal after about six weeks (when cardiac activity can be detected in the embryo)--with no exceptions for rape or incest.
"Yes, I'm angry," writes Elizabeth Warren. "I'm angry at the justices who deliberately deceived the American people. I'm angry at the Republicans in Congress who stole two Supreme Court seats to get us to this day. And I'm angry at the cruelty of the anti-abortion politicians who will impose enormous pain, suffering, and possible death on people who have the fewest resources to fight back."
The passage of Roe v. Wade in 1973 was a direct undoing of the infrastructure of patriarchy: male rule, female submissiveness. It dug to the core of who we are and began creating change at, perhaps, the deepest level of being human.
Playwright Eve Ensler (also known as V) puts it this way: Overturning Roe "will catalyze and amplify the rightwing misogynist project that is taking away the rights of women everywhere. . . . If we allow the erasure of this central right for women, it will escalate the erasure of them all.
". . . this is not about babies, it is about destroying women's agency and autonomy. And we know that this will most harshly affect the lives of Black and Brown women and marginalized people"--that is to say, those without the resources to travel long distances for an abortion.
In short, this is a complex combo of racism, sexism and God. It's not an issue to be solved with simplistic, "pro-life" self-righteousness. I honor and value all who are truly pro-life--who stand against trillion-dollar military budgets, a nuclear-armed planet, poverty and starvation--but:
". . . these self-styled pro-lifers don't seem to care much about 'life, once a baby is born," Jill Filipovic wrote three years ago at The Guardian, in reference to Donald Trump's supporters. "They want to cut aid to needy children and healthcare to poor mothers and pregnant women. They oppose contraception and sex education--the most effective ways to reduce the abortion rate. Many of them continue to support a president who separates small children from their parents and keeps them in squalid cages."
They saw in Trump, she wrote, "a kindred spirit who would work for their interests--their primary interest being a symbolic reassertion of their cultural dominance."
But cultural--patriarchal--dominance is at the end of its reign, with or without Roe v. Wade. Of course, if the leaked SCOTUS draft holds and Roe is overturned, if legal abortion turns into a patchwork right across the national landscape, chaos will ensue.
"There will be marching, demonstrations, sit-ins, petitions," writes Robin Morgan. "Women will go ahead and disobey the law. What are they going to do when half the population is in revolt? Not 20 percent, not the ultra right wing, not the evangelicals. Women are going to control what happens to our own bodies. No matter how many thousands of us have to go to jail. We are not turning back the clock. No way."
"Then the Lord God said, 'It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.'"--Genesis 2:18. RSV
One chapter later, after Eve was held responsible for the First Sin (Adam, the submissive male, just did what she told him to), we have this:
"To the woman he said, 'I will greatly multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be contrary for your husband, and he shall rule over you.'"--Genesis 3:16
"Women will go ahead and disobey the law. What are they going to do when half the population is in revolt?"
Some people are able to liberate the creation story from its theological misogyny, but for most believers (especially the male ones), it's pretty clear: Women are commanded, indeed, they were created, to do what they're told. This is our cultural infrastructure--a.k.a., the patriarchy--ten thousand or so years in the making.
The prejudice leaps into the New Testament ("Let a woman learn in silence with all submissiveness."--I Timothy 2:11), and on and on. Thirteen hundred years later, here's Thomas Aquinas, high-fiving Aristotle, agreeing that a woman is a "misbegotten male." Jump forward another seven centuries and we get SCOTUS Judge Samuel Alito:
"Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and (Planned Parenthood v. Casey) have enflamed debate and deepened division."
As everyone knows at this point, a woman's right to an abortion--a woman's right to be in full control of her own body--is now in jeopardy. This is a terrifying possibility. If the Supreme Court overthrows Roe v. Wade, the legality of abortion will be decided state by state, and at this point more than half of them are ready to pass legislation turning it back into a crime. Oklahoma, for instance, just passed a law making abortion illegal after about six weeks (when cardiac activity can be detected in the embryo)--with no exceptions for rape or incest.
"Yes, I'm angry," writes Elizabeth Warren. "I'm angry at the justices who deliberately deceived the American people. I'm angry at the Republicans in Congress who stole two Supreme Court seats to get us to this day. And I'm angry at the cruelty of the anti-abortion politicians who will impose enormous pain, suffering, and possible death on people who have the fewest resources to fight back."
The passage of Roe v. Wade in 1973 was a direct undoing of the infrastructure of patriarchy: male rule, female submissiveness. It dug to the core of who we are and began creating change at, perhaps, the deepest level of being human.
Playwright Eve Ensler (also known as V) puts it this way: Overturning Roe "will catalyze and amplify the rightwing misogynist project that is taking away the rights of women everywhere. . . . If we allow the erasure of this central right for women, it will escalate the erasure of them all.
". . . this is not about babies, it is about destroying women's agency and autonomy. And we know that this will most harshly affect the lives of Black and Brown women and marginalized people"--that is to say, those without the resources to travel long distances for an abortion.
In short, this is a complex combo of racism, sexism and God. It's not an issue to be solved with simplistic, "pro-life" self-righteousness. I honor and value all who are truly pro-life--who stand against trillion-dollar military budgets, a nuclear-armed planet, poverty and starvation--but:
". . . these self-styled pro-lifers don't seem to care much about 'life, once a baby is born," Jill Filipovic wrote three years ago at The Guardian, in reference to Donald Trump's supporters. "They want to cut aid to needy children and healthcare to poor mothers and pregnant women. They oppose contraception and sex education--the most effective ways to reduce the abortion rate. Many of them continue to support a president who separates small children from their parents and keeps them in squalid cages."
They saw in Trump, she wrote, "a kindred spirit who would work for their interests--their primary interest being a symbolic reassertion of their cultural dominance."
But cultural--patriarchal--dominance is at the end of its reign, with or without Roe v. Wade. Of course, if the leaked SCOTUS draft holds and Roe is overturned, if legal abortion turns into a patchwork right across the national landscape, chaos will ensue.
"There will be marching, demonstrations, sit-ins, petitions," writes Robin Morgan. "Women will go ahead and disobey the law. What are they going to do when half the population is in revolt? Not 20 percent, not the ultra right wing, not the evangelicals. Women are going to control what happens to our own bodies. No matter how many thousands of us have to go to jail. We are not turning back the clock. No way."