Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

joe_manchin_minimum_wage

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) speaks during a news conference with a bipartisan group of lawmakers on December 14, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Al Drago for The Washington Post via Getty Images

Cherry-Picking Polls to Mask Public Support for Biden's Reconciliation Package

Olsen presented a red herring argument about how many independents think the plan costs too much—all the while ignoring all the other polls showing support for the plan.

Washington Post columnist Henry Olsen (9/30/21) lauded Sen. Joe Manchin's opposition to the $3.5 trillion reconciliation package being considered by Congress, because Manchin "correctly reads public opinion."

That opinion, Olsen asserted, does not support the "radical change" that the reconciliation package, known as the Build Back Better bill, entails.

WaPo: Joe Manchin delivers a dagger to the heart of the progressive cause

Washington Post columnist Henry Olsen (9/30/21) says that Sen. Joe Manchin "correctly reads public opinion." That's more than you can say for Henry Olsen.

His assertion is contradicted by his own newspaper's poll, conducted with ABC News (8/29/21–9/1/21), which reported that Americans support the reconciliation package 53% to 41%.

That finding was similar to several other polls, as shown below. (To see results of the Pew poll, go here; for the other polls, go to PollingReport.com.)

Screen Shot

The margins in favor of the reconciliation package vary from a low of 12 points in the WP/ABC poll, to 24 points in the Pew poll. (Pew finds a larger "unsure" percentage, because, unlike other polls, it does not press that group to make a decision.)

Overall, the picture is uniformly favorable toward the bill. Wrote Gallup's Frank Newport (8/13/21) in a review of public opinion: "Existing survey evidence shows majority support for the new bill, and this level of support appears to be fairly robust across samples and ways of asking about it."

Majority support is also shown when the public is asked about individual provisions of the plan.

Evading the question

But Olsen cited none of those polls.

Instead, he argued that the 2020 election results were so close, they didn't give Biden a mandate for the type of change he is seeking. "A 50/50 election never augurs radical change."

Washington Post: Biden 306, Trump 232

Contrary to Henry Olsen, 2020 was not a "50/50 election." (Graphic: Washington Post)

Aside from the fact that Biden won the popular vote by 7 million votes, or more than 4 percentage points, that's a weak argument. Election results hardly produce clear indications of what policies the public prefers. The advantage of polls is that they ask people directly what they want. And, as shown above, the polls have shown widespread support for the $3.5 trillion bill.

Olsen also contended that Biden's approval rating had been declining recently. "This erosion," he wrote, "began just as public discussion of the reconciliation bill started to grow," implying that the rating decline occurred because people don't like the reconciliation bill.

However, the opposite conclusion can be drawn. CNN's Harry Enten speculates that Biden's falling ratings are caused by inaction on the reconciliation bill, not the provisions of the bill, which apparently most Americans like.

Rather than speculate on what Americans might like based on presidential approval ratings, however, one can refer to polls that ask people directly about the policies themselves.

Red herring argument

The only poll Olsen turns to that asked the public directly about the BBB package was an Echelon Insights poll, conducted August 13–18. And that poll also showed substantial public support for the reconciliation package. When asked, "Based on what you have heard, do you support or oppose the $3.5 trillion budget resolution currently being debated in Congress?" 45% said they were in favor, 29% opposed and 26% unsure.

Henry Olsen

Henry Olsen

The margin in favor of the resolution was 16 percentage points (45%–29%), smaller than the margin found by Pew (24 points), but comparable to the margin found by Fox (17 points), and higher than the margins found by WP/ABC (12 points) and Suffolk University/USA Today (13 points).

But Olsen did not cite the results of this question.

Instead, he referred to the next question in that poll, which asks if the budget plan is "spending too much money, too little, or just the right amount?"

The results there show that 40% overall say the amount was "too much." Olsen didn't even report that figure. He singled out the response of independents, which showed 49% saying too much.

But what can one make of that result? According to the poll question Olsen cited, 38% of Americans overall don't think the amount is too much, and another 22% are unsure.

The fact remains, according to the previous question in the same poll, respondents favored the plan by 16 percentage points.

Olsen didn't share that information with his readers. Instead, he presented a red herring argument about how many independents think the plan costs too much—all the while ignoring all the other polls showing support for the plan.


© 2021 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
David-Moore

David Moore

David Moore is a senior fellow with the Carsey School at the University of New Hampshire, and a two-time winner of the EPPY (Editors and Publishers) Award for his writing on iMediaEthics. He is a former managing editor of the Gallup Poll, and author of The Opinion Makers: An Insider Exposes the Truth Behind the Polls.

... We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

AOC, Joyce Introduce Bipartisan Bill for 'Immediate Relief' From Cannabis Convictions

"Goes to show that lawmakers don't have to agree on everything to find common ground on solutions to the challenges facing everyday Americans."

Brett Wilkins ·


Green Groups Demand Answers About 'Flimsy' and Buried Biden Drilling Report

"Public records released as a result of this request will shine light on the dangerous chasm separating Biden's climate promises from his refusal to phase out the use of our public lands and waters for oil and gas extraction."

Jessica Corbett ·


'Protest Works': Cheers as Shell Signals Pullout of Cambo Oil Field Project

"We have to see the end of North Sea projects as well as all new fossil fuel extraction: There is no future in them."

Julia Conley ·


Pentagon Blasted for 'Unacceptable Failure' to Reckon With Civilian Casualties

"For too long, the United States has failed to live up to its legal and moral commitments to the protection of civilians, as well as its own stated policies. This needs to change."

Brett Wilkins ·


Groups Say Congress Should Reject Biden's Harmful Sentencing Proposal on Fentanyl-Related Drugs

"The facts don't support the argument that a harsh law enforcement approach, such as permanent classwide scheduling of fentanyl-related substances, will curb drug distribution, sale, and use."

Andrea Germanos ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo