Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

If you’ve been waiting for the right time to support our work—that time is now.

Our mission is simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

But without the support of our readers, this model does not work and we simply won’t survive. It’s that simple.
We must meet our Mid-Year Campaign goal but we need you now.

Please, support independent journalism today.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

doctors

Original Medicare enrollees who do not have supplemental coverage are at substantial financial and health risk. (Photo: Paul Hennessy/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Congress Should Ensure a Better Medicare

A low out-of-pocket cap in Medicare would save lives and help millions of lower and middle-income people with Medicare who are skipping needed care.

Bill Kadereit

It's well understood that health care costs are out of control in America. Older and disabled Americans are hit hardest because we use three times more health care services than working people. Congress can and should ensure health care is affordable to us through a reasonable Medicare out-of-pocket cap.

To be clear, original Medicare works well for many who can afford supplemental coverage that picks up most of Medicare's out-of-pocket costs. They can buy great health care protection and they don't have to decide between their rent and a hospital procedure.

Over half of all people with Medicare live on annual incomes under $30,000.

However, millions of people with Medicare cannot afford private supplemental coverage. Higher health care costs are driving premium, deductible, co-pay and coinsurance costs up. According to the 2020 Medicare Trustees' Report, the Center for Medicare Services (CMS) projects Medicare payments more than double from $797 billion in 2019 to $1.6 trillion by 2029. That's an increase of $649 per enrollee per month - $7,778 annually!

This imminent tsunami will be especially tragic for those in original Medicare who are not protected by a reasonable out-of-pocket cap. Today, over half of all people with Medicare live on annual incomes under $30,000. At this level and even at much higher incomes, sticker shock is already very real today. In 7-8 years, it will be catastrophic.

Millions more people with Medicare cannot buy supplemental coverage even if they can afford it. They have no guaranteed right to buy it in most cases, after their initial enrollment period in Medicare.  Consider the example of a 65-year-olds who enroll in  in a Medicare Advantage (MA) plan, but later switch to original Medicare without an out-of-pocket cap. If they contract cancer 2 years later and then try to purchase Medigap coverage, insurers will often deny them.

Original Medicare enrollees who do not have supplemental coverage are at substantial financial and health risk. A single chronic illness or catastrophic health event can lead to bankruptcy. With the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Congress ensured that everyone with private health insurance had an out-of-pocket limit for their health care. However, people with Medicare are not covered by the ACA.

MA plans, which offer Medicare benefits through private health insurers, are required to provide out-of-pocket financial protection to their enrollees. (That said, the limit is exorbitant at as much as $7,550 in 2021.) Congress should ensure that everyone with Medicare has a reasonable limit on financial liability for their care.

A low out-of-pocket cap in Medicare would save lives and help millions of lower and middle-income people with Medicare who are skipping needed care.

A reasonable out-of-pocket cap would ensure that those over age-65 have meaningful access to three alternative choices. They could enroll in original Medicare with an out-of-pocket cap or Medigap or in a MA plan knowing their costs would be limited. People with complex conditions, people under 65 with disabilities, people who live in rural communities and people who move throughout the year, among others, often need optional choices. Adding an out-of-pocket cap to original Medicare would satisfy these needs.

Giving people a meaningful choice of original Medicare has programmatic benefits as well as health benefits. Since its inception, Medicare Advantage has cost the Medicare Trust Fund significantly more per person than original Medicare. Medicare Advantage also drives up Part B premiums. Original Medicare is far more cost-effective.

Adding an out-of-pocket cap to original Medicare can be a steppingstone toward addressing long-term care (LTC) services that can cost $15,000 a month today, much more by 2029. Over 61 million Americans use LTC services today.

MedPAC and the Medicare Trustees' report data reveal that private MA plans have captured over 44% of the Medicare market. In 2021, over $41 billion in federal rebates will be doled out to MA plan insurers. That's $140 per month per MA plan enrollee. Why not apply some of that $140 a month to cap out-of-pocket costs for everyone in Medicare?

The last published U.S. Census projected that by 2060, when our grandchildren and greatgrandchildren will need affordable health care coverage in retirement, there will be 100 million Americans over age 65—nearly 25 percent of the U.S. population.  

Now is the time for Congress to set forward-looking health care policies. That includes adding an out-of-pocket cap to original Medicare so that it can continue as a better choice than the more costly Medicare Advantage private plans and can offer a competitive alternative to Medigap private plans.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Bill

Bill Kadereit

Bill Kadereit is president of the National Retiree Legislative Network (NRLN).

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.

 

80+ US Prosecutors Vow Not to Be Part of Criminalizing Abortion Care

"Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice," says a joint statement signed by 84 elected attorneys. "Prosecutors should not be part of that."

Kenny Stancil ·


Progressives Rebuke Dem Leadership as Clyburn Dismisses Death of Roe as 'Anticlimactic'

"The gap between the Democratic leadership, and younger progressives on the question of 'How Bad Is It?' is just enormous."

Julia Conley ·


In 10 Key US Senate Races, Here's How Top Candidates Responded to Roe Ruling

While Republicans unanimously welcomed the Supreme Court's rollback of half a century of reproductive rights, one Democrat said "it's just wrong that my granddaughter will have fewer freedoms than my grandmother did."

Brett Wilkins ·


Sanders Says End Filibuster to Combat 'Outrageous' Supreme Court Assault on Abortion Rights

"If Republicans can end the filibuster to install right-wing judges to overturn Roe v. Wade, Democrats can and must end the filibuster, codify Roe v. Wade, and make abortion legal and safe," said the Vermont senator.

Jake Johnson ·


Patients in Trigger-Ban States Immediately Denied Abortion Care in Post-Roe US

Some people scheduled to receive abortions were turned away within minutes of the right-wing Supreme Court's decision to strike down Roe v. Wade.

Kenny Stancil ·

Common Dreams Logo