SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In West Africa, the African continent's most unequal region, the richest 1 percent hold more net worth than the entire bottom 99 percent. (Photo credit should read FATI ABUBAKAR/AFP/Getty Images)
A Lesson from West Africa, a Global Inequality Ground Zero
To end poverty at the bottom of our economic orders, we need to stop wealth from concentrating at the top.
Jul 30, 2019
Should we care how much wealth our wealthiest are grabbing? The flacks who seek deep-pocket favor have a ready response. Of course not, they tell us. Kvetching about the wealth of the wealthy just distracts us from the more important work we all ought to be doing--like growing our economic pie and getting everybody bigger pieces.
The folks at Oxfam, the global charitable network, would beg to disagree, and they've just released still another compelling report that says so. This latest analysis revolves around West Africa and particularly Nigeria, the region's economic powerhouse.
By all the standard metrics, Nigeria is doing just fine, booming even. In Africa overall, wealth jumped 13 percent in the decade ending in 2017, the most recent year with good numbers available. Wealth in Nigeria increased 19 percent.
These increases, Oxfam notes, should have created "an enormous opportunity to improve the lives of the many." Instead, the increases have essentially "benefited only a select few."
Nigeria's richest elites now enjoy world-class status. The five wealthiest Nigerians currently hold a combined fortune worth $29.9 billion, for just about a $6 billion average, a big-league bundle in anybody's ballpark.
Nigeria's single richest individual, Oxfam calculates, annually earns enough income off his wealth to take 2 million poor Nigerians out of poverty every year.
Nigeria's single richest individual, Oxfam calculates, annually earns enough income off his wealth to take 2 million poor Nigerians out of poverty every year. Think about that for a moment. Nigeria's richest man could significantly improve the well-being of 2 million desperately poor souls in 2019 and still end the year every bit as rich as when the year started.
Nigeria's richest man is making no such move in that direction. He seems to feel he needs still more. What in heaven for? He already, Oxfam helpfully points out, "earns about 150,000 times more from his wealth than the poorest 10 percent of Nigerians spend on average on their basic consumption in a year." Nigeria's wealthiest individual could spend $1 million a day and still not run out of money for 46 years.
In West Africa, the African continent's most unequal region, the richest 1 percent hold more net worth than the entire bottom 99 percent. The West African governments these top 1 percenters dominate do less than any other governments in Africa to advance social well-being. They spend the continent's least on the "most essential elements of a dignified life"--quality schools, health care, and decent jobs.
Nigeria, adds Oxfam, "has the worst score on social spending, not only in Africa but in the world."
And where do West African governments choose to steer the resources they do spend? These governments turn out to be quite generous with tax incentives for multinational corporate giants. The amount they dedicate annually to these corporate subsidies, Oxfam researchers point out, "would be enough to build about 100 modern and well-equipped hospitals each year in the region."
Oxfam's new report, The West Africa inequality crisis, recommends "scrapping unnecessary tax incentives" and increasing overall tax progressivity by expanding taxes "typically paid by the rich," among a host of other policy moves that aim to "redistribute from the rich to the poor." Tackling inequality, the new Oxfam analysis stresses, will always be "critical to the fight against extreme poverty."
"Indeed, unless countries significantly close the gap between the richest and the rest," Oxfam concludes, "ending extreme poverty will remain just a dream."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Sam Pizzigati
Sam Pizzigati, veteran labor journalist and Institute for Policy Studies associate fellow, edits Inequality.org. His recent books include: The Case for a Maximum Wage (2018) and The Rich Don't Always Win: The Forgotten Triumph over Plutocracy that Created the American Middle Class, 1900-1970 (2012).
Should we care how much wealth our wealthiest are grabbing? The flacks who seek deep-pocket favor have a ready response. Of course not, they tell us. Kvetching about the wealth of the wealthy just distracts us from the more important work we all ought to be doing--like growing our economic pie and getting everybody bigger pieces.
The folks at Oxfam, the global charitable network, would beg to disagree, and they've just released still another compelling report that says so. This latest analysis revolves around West Africa and particularly Nigeria, the region's economic powerhouse.
By all the standard metrics, Nigeria is doing just fine, booming even. In Africa overall, wealth jumped 13 percent in the decade ending in 2017, the most recent year with good numbers available. Wealth in Nigeria increased 19 percent.
These increases, Oxfam notes, should have created "an enormous opportunity to improve the lives of the many." Instead, the increases have essentially "benefited only a select few."
Nigeria's richest elites now enjoy world-class status. The five wealthiest Nigerians currently hold a combined fortune worth $29.9 billion, for just about a $6 billion average, a big-league bundle in anybody's ballpark.
Nigeria's single richest individual, Oxfam calculates, annually earns enough income off his wealth to take 2 million poor Nigerians out of poverty every year.
Nigeria's single richest individual, Oxfam calculates, annually earns enough income off his wealth to take 2 million poor Nigerians out of poverty every year. Think about that for a moment. Nigeria's richest man could significantly improve the well-being of 2 million desperately poor souls in 2019 and still end the year every bit as rich as when the year started.
Nigeria's richest man is making no such move in that direction. He seems to feel he needs still more. What in heaven for? He already, Oxfam helpfully points out, "earns about 150,000 times more from his wealth than the poorest 10 percent of Nigerians spend on average on their basic consumption in a year." Nigeria's wealthiest individual could spend $1 million a day and still not run out of money for 46 years.
In West Africa, the African continent's most unequal region, the richest 1 percent hold more net worth than the entire bottom 99 percent. The West African governments these top 1 percenters dominate do less than any other governments in Africa to advance social well-being. They spend the continent's least on the "most essential elements of a dignified life"--quality schools, health care, and decent jobs.
Nigeria, adds Oxfam, "has the worst score on social spending, not only in Africa but in the world."
And where do West African governments choose to steer the resources they do spend? These governments turn out to be quite generous with tax incentives for multinational corporate giants. The amount they dedicate annually to these corporate subsidies, Oxfam researchers point out, "would be enough to build about 100 modern and well-equipped hospitals each year in the region."
Oxfam's new report, The West Africa inequality crisis, recommends "scrapping unnecessary tax incentives" and increasing overall tax progressivity by expanding taxes "typically paid by the rich," among a host of other policy moves that aim to "redistribute from the rich to the poor." Tackling inequality, the new Oxfam analysis stresses, will always be "critical to the fight against extreme poverty."
"Indeed, unless countries significantly close the gap between the richest and the rest," Oxfam concludes, "ending extreme poverty will remain just a dream."
Sam Pizzigati
Sam Pizzigati, veteran labor journalist and Institute for Policy Studies associate fellow, edits Inequality.org. His recent books include: The Case for a Maximum Wage (2018) and The Rich Don't Always Win: The Forgotten Triumph over Plutocracy that Created the American Middle Class, 1900-1970 (2012).
Should we care how much wealth our wealthiest are grabbing? The flacks who seek deep-pocket favor have a ready response. Of course not, they tell us. Kvetching about the wealth of the wealthy just distracts us from the more important work we all ought to be doing--like growing our economic pie and getting everybody bigger pieces.
The folks at Oxfam, the global charitable network, would beg to disagree, and they've just released still another compelling report that says so. This latest analysis revolves around West Africa and particularly Nigeria, the region's economic powerhouse.
By all the standard metrics, Nigeria is doing just fine, booming even. In Africa overall, wealth jumped 13 percent in the decade ending in 2017, the most recent year with good numbers available. Wealth in Nigeria increased 19 percent.
These increases, Oxfam notes, should have created "an enormous opportunity to improve the lives of the many." Instead, the increases have essentially "benefited only a select few."
Nigeria's richest elites now enjoy world-class status. The five wealthiest Nigerians currently hold a combined fortune worth $29.9 billion, for just about a $6 billion average, a big-league bundle in anybody's ballpark.
Nigeria's single richest individual, Oxfam calculates, annually earns enough income off his wealth to take 2 million poor Nigerians out of poverty every year.
Nigeria's single richest individual, Oxfam calculates, annually earns enough income off his wealth to take 2 million poor Nigerians out of poverty every year. Think about that for a moment. Nigeria's richest man could significantly improve the well-being of 2 million desperately poor souls in 2019 and still end the year every bit as rich as when the year started.
Nigeria's richest man is making no such move in that direction. He seems to feel he needs still more. What in heaven for? He already, Oxfam helpfully points out, "earns about 150,000 times more from his wealth than the poorest 10 percent of Nigerians spend on average on their basic consumption in a year." Nigeria's wealthiest individual could spend $1 million a day and still not run out of money for 46 years.
In West Africa, the African continent's most unequal region, the richest 1 percent hold more net worth than the entire bottom 99 percent. The West African governments these top 1 percenters dominate do less than any other governments in Africa to advance social well-being. They spend the continent's least on the "most essential elements of a dignified life"--quality schools, health care, and decent jobs.
Nigeria, adds Oxfam, "has the worst score on social spending, not only in Africa but in the world."
And where do West African governments choose to steer the resources they do spend? These governments turn out to be quite generous with tax incentives for multinational corporate giants. The amount they dedicate annually to these corporate subsidies, Oxfam researchers point out, "would be enough to build about 100 modern and well-equipped hospitals each year in the region."
Oxfam's new report, The West Africa inequality crisis, recommends "scrapping unnecessary tax incentives" and increasing overall tax progressivity by expanding taxes "typically paid by the rich," among a host of other policy moves that aim to "redistribute from the rich to the poor." Tackling inequality, the new Oxfam analysis stresses, will always be "critical to the fight against extreme poverty."
"Indeed, unless countries significantly close the gap between the richest and the rest," Oxfam concludes, "ending extreme poverty will remain just a dream."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.