SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Sens. Booker and Hirono specifically stated that they were releasing specific relevant "committee confidential" documents regardless of the illegitimate designation." (Photo: Screenshot)
Democrats' Civil Disobedience for American Values at the Sham SCOTUS Hearing
No Supreme Court confirmation process has been infected with corruption at this scale in modern times, perhaps ever
Sep 06, 2018
The GOP's effort to sell the Brett Kavanaugh hearings as legitimate crumbled even further as soon as Day Three began.
Chairman Grassley insisted the "committee confidential" process was fair and gave all senators plenty of time to make certain documents public. He read from a memo he claims to have sent to all members on August 22, setting a deadline for August 28 for them to submit requests for specific documents to be re-designated as publicly available.
So when thousands of records were dumped hours before the hearing began, senators were supposed to have asked Grassley for permission to re-designate specific documents by nearly a week earlier?
Democratic senators pointed out that the secret documents have nothing personal, nothing implicating national security, nothing at all sensitive--except that they reveal unflattering aspects of Kavanaugh's record that would make it all the more clear that he should not be confirmed.
Sens. Booker and Hirono specifically stated that they were releasing specific relevant "committee confidential" documents regardless of the illegitimate designation. Booker, announcing the release of documents on Kavanaugh and racial profiling, accurately called this civil disobedience.
Other Democrats agreed, making clear they do not accept the legitimacy of this hearing and of the "committee confidential" process. Ranking member Dianne Feinstein states that 190,000 documents have been so designated.
It has been clear from the start that this is a partisan process, designed to hide rather than reveal the nominee's record.
- After meeting with President Trump, Grassley chose not to ask the National Archives to provide records from Kavanaugh's three years as George W. Bush's staff secretary, a job of importance and substance that Kavanaugh himself has called relevant to his qualifications.
- Although the National Archives informed Grassley that they could not begin providing records until early October, Chairman scheduled the hearing for early September.
- Instead of getting records from the nonpartisan Archives, it's Kavanaugh's fellow Republican and former deputy Bill Burck who is deciding which documents will be released.
No Supreme Court confirmation process has been infected with corruption at this scale in modern times, perhaps ever. It threatens democracy, and that is its purpose.
Let's hear it for civil disobedience.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Paul Gordon
Paul Gordon is People For the American Way's senior legislative counsel, where he focuses particularly on matters relating to the federal courts, including the Supreme Court.
The GOP's effort to sell the Brett Kavanaugh hearings as legitimate crumbled even further as soon as Day Three began.
Chairman Grassley insisted the "committee confidential" process was fair and gave all senators plenty of time to make certain documents public. He read from a memo he claims to have sent to all members on August 22, setting a deadline for August 28 for them to submit requests for specific documents to be re-designated as publicly available.
So when thousands of records were dumped hours before the hearing began, senators were supposed to have asked Grassley for permission to re-designate specific documents by nearly a week earlier?
Democratic senators pointed out that the secret documents have nothing personal, nothing implicating national security, nothing at all sensitive--except that they reveal unflattering aspects of Kavanaugh's record that would make it all the more clear that he should not be confirmed.
Sens. Booker and Hirono specifically stated that they were releasing specific relevant "committee confidential" documents regardless of the illegitimate designation. Booker, announcing the release of documents on Kavanaugh and racial profiling, accurately called this civil disobedience.
Other Democrats agreed, making clear they do not accept the legitimacy of this hearing and of the "committee confidential" process. Ranking member Dianne Feinstein states that 190,000 documents have been so designated.
It has been clear from the start that this is a partisan process, designed to hide rather than reveal the nominee's record.
- After meeting with President Trump, Grassley chose not to ask the National Archives to provide records from Kavanaugh's three years as George W. Bush's staff secretary, a job of importance and substance that Kavanaugh himself has called relevant to his qualifications.
- Although the National Archives informed Grassley that they could not begin providing records until early October, Chairman scheduled the hearing for early September.
- Instead of getting records from the nonpartisan Archives, it's Kavanaugh's fellow Republican and former deputy Bill Burck who is deciding which documents will be released.
No Supreme Court confirmation process has been infected with corruption at this scale in modern times, perhaps ever. It threatens democracy, and that is its purpose.
Let's hear it for civil disobedience.
Paul Gordon
Paul Gordon is People For the American Way's senior legislative counsel, where he focuses particularly on matters relating to the federal courts, including the Supreme Court.
The GOP's effort to sell the Brett Kavanaugh hearings as legitimate crumbled even further as soon as Day Three began.
Chairman Grassley insisted the "committee confidential" process was fair and gave all senators plenty of time to make certain documents public. He read from a memo he claims to have sent to all members on August 22, setting a deadline for August 28 for them to submit requests for specific documents to be re-designated as publicly available.
So when thousands of records were dumped hours before the hearing began, senators were supposed to have asked Grassley for permission to re-designate specific documents by nearly a week earlier?
Democratic senators pointed out that the secret documents have nothing personal, nothing implicating national security, nothing at all sensitive--except that they reveal unflattering aspects of Kavanaugh's record that would make it all the more clear that he should not be confirmed.
Sens. Booker and Hirono specifically stated that they were releasing specific relevant "committee confidential" documents regardless of the illegitimate designation. Booker, announcing the release of documents on Kavanaugh and racial profiling, accurately called this civil disobedience.
Other Democrats agreed, making clear they do not accept the legitimacy of this hearing and of the "committee confidential" process. Ranking member Dianne Feinstein states that 190,000 documents have been so designated.
It has been clear from the start that this is a partisan process, designed to hide rather than reveal the nominee's record.
- After meeting with President Trump, Grassley chose not to ask the National Archives to provide records from Kavanaugh's three years as George W. Bush's staff secretary, a job of importance and substance that Kavanaugh himself has called relevant to his qualifications.
- Although the National Archives informed Grassley that they could not begin providing records until early October, Chairman scheduled the hearing for early September.
- Instead of getting records from the nonpartisan Archives, it's Kavanaugh's fellow Republican and former deputy Bill Burck who is deciding which documents will be released.
No Supreme Court confirmation process has been infected with corruption at this scale in modern times, perhaps ever. It threatens democracy, and that is its purpose.
Let's hear it for civil disobedience.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.