SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A U.S. Border Patrol facility for children and families in McAllen, Texas, pictured in September 2014. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
'Whatever' - What Happens to Kids Taken From Families at US Border
CBP has no childcare facilities in detention centers.
Jun 18, 2018
I've had a chance over the past few days to see what happens to kids right after they're separated from their parents by US immigration officials. White House chief of staff John Kelly said we shouldn't worry about these kids because they'll be "put into foster care or whatever."
"Whatever" seems to be what they're aiming for, judging from my time interviewing children and their parents in McAllen, Texas. There are no specific services for kids at US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) detention facilities there - both the short-term holding cells known informally as the "freezers" because they are kept so cold and the larger processing center. No recreational areas, no place to run around and play, and no toys or books of any kind. "We're not set up as a child care facility," a CBP official told us.
These are intended to be short-term detention facilities: federal law requires CBP to transfer unaccompanied children to the Department of Health and Human Services "not later than 72 hours" after authorities know they're separated from their parents.
But three days alone is a long time for any kid. Consider the five-year-old boy I met on Friday. He'd been sitting in a caged area for nearly a day with older children he didn't know; nobody told him where his mother was or what would happen to him.
Now that CBP is effectively running day care for kids too young for grade school, you'd think they might at least bring in staff with the skills to look after children. But as I sat in CBP's Ursula processing center most of Friday, the only staff I saw were uniformed agents, one or two assigned to watch over four to six pens each holding 20 to 30 children.
Some of these kids aren't out of diapers. When Michelle Brane of the Women's Refugee Commission checked in on a girl estimated by CBP to be 2, she discovered that a group of teenage girls had been taking turns caring for her for three days. She said that CBP officials had done nothing more than check off the girl's name at roll call.
President Donald Trump has all but admitted he's using family separation as a negotiating tactic to get immigration legislation he wants. That's reprehensible. Kids shouldn't be used as political pawns. And "whatever" isn't an acceptable policy response when the government separates children from their families.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Michael Garcia Bochenek
Michael Garcia Bochenek is senior counsel to the Children's Rights Division of Human Rights Watch, focusing on juvenile justice and refugee and migrant children.
I've had a chance over the past few days to see what happens to kids right after they're separated from their parents by US immigration officials. White House chief of staff John Kelly said we shouldn't worry about these kids because they'll be "put into foster care or whatever."
"Whatever" seems to be what they're aiming for, judging from my time interviewing children and their parents in McAllen, Texas. There are no specific services for kids at US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) detention facilities there - both the short-term holding cells known informally as the "freezers" because they are kept so cold and the larger processing center. No recreational areas, no place to run around and play, and no toys or books of any kind. "We're not set up as a child care facility," a CBP official told us.
These are intended to be short-term detention facilities: federal law requires CBP to transfer unaccompanied children to the Department of Health and Human Services "not later than 72 hours" after authorities know they're separated from their parents.
But three days alone is a long time for any kid. Consider the five-year-old boy I met on Friday. He'd been sitting in a caged area for nearly a day with older children he didn't know; nobody told him where his mother was or what would happen to him.
Now that CBP is effectively running day care for kids too young for grade school, you'd think they might at least bring in staff with the skills to look after children. But as I sat in CBP's Ursula processing center most of Friday, the only staff I saw were uniformed agents, one or two assigned to watch over four to six pens each holding 20 to 30 children.
Some of these kids aren't out of diapers. When Michelle Brane of the Women's Refugee Commission checked in on a girl estimated by CBP to be 2, she discovered that a group of teenage girls had been taking turns caring for her for three days. She said that CBP officials had done nothing more than check off the girl's name at roll call.
President Donald Trump has all but admitted he's using family separation as a negotiating tactic to get immigration legislation he wants. That's reprehensible. Kids shouldn't be used as political pawns. And "whatever" isn't an acceptable policy response when the government separates children from their families.
Michael Garcia Bochenek
Michael Garcia Bochenek is senior counsel to the Children's Rights Division of Human Rights Watch, focusing on juvenile justice and refugee and migrant children.
I've had a chance over the past few days to see what happens to kids right after they're separated from their parents by US immigration officials. White House chief of staff John Kelly said we shouldn't worry about these kids because they'll be "put into foster care or whatever."
"Whatever" seems to be what they're aiming for, judging from my time interviewing children and their parents in McAllen, Texas. There are no specific services for kids at US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) detention facilities there - both the short-term holding cells known informally as the "freezers" because they are kept so cold and the larger processing center. No recreational areas, no place to run around and play, and no toys or books of any kind. "We're not set up as a child care facility," a CBP official told us.
These are intended to be short-term detention facilities: federal law requires CBP to transfer unaccompanied children to the Department of Health and Human Services "not later than 72 hours" after authorities know they're separated from their parents.
But three days alone is a long time for any kid. Consider the five-year-old boy I met on Friday. He'd been sitting in a caged area for nearly a day with older children he didn't know; nobody told him where his mother was or what would happen to him.
Now that CBP is effectively running day care for kids too young for grade school, you'd think they might at least bring in staff with the skills to look after children. But as I sat in CBP's Ursula processing center most of Friday, the only staff I saw were uniformed agents, one or two assigned to watch over four to six pens each holding 20 to 30 children.
Some of these kids aren't out of diapers. When Michelle Brane of the Women's Refugee Commission checked in on a girl estimated by CBP to be 2, she discovered that a group of teenage girls had been taking turns caring for her for three days. She said that CBP officials had done nothing more than check off the girl's name at roll call.
President Donald Trump has all but admitted he's using family separation as a negotiating tactic to get immigration legislation he wants. That's reprehensible. Kids shouldn't be used as political pawns. And "whatever" isn't an acceptable policy response when the government separates children from their families.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.