SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A U.S. Border Patrol facility for children and families in McAllen, Texas, pictured in September 2014. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
I've had a chance over the past few days to see what happens to kids right after they're separated from their parents by US immigration officials. White House chief of staff John Kelly said we shouldn't worry about these kids because they'll be "put into foster care or whatever."
"Whatever" seems to be what they're aiming for, judging from my time interviewing children and their parents in McAllen, Texas. There are no specific services for kids at US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) detention facilities there - both the short-term holding cells known informally as the "freezers" because they are kept so cold and the larger processing center. No recreational areas, no place to run around and play, and no toys or books of any kind. "We're not set up as a child care facility," a CBP official told us.
These are intended to be short-term detention facilities: federal law requires CBP to transfer unaccompanied children to the Department of Health and Human Services "not later than 72 hours" after authorities know they're separated from their parents.
But three days alone is a long time for any kid. Consider the five-year-old boy I met on Friday. He'd been sitting in a caged area for nearly a day with older children he didn't know; nobody told him where his mother was or what would happen to him.
Now that CBP is effectively running day care for kids too young for grade school, you'd think they might at least bring in staff with the skills to look after children. But as I sat in CBP's Ursula processing center most of Friday, the only staff I saw were uniformed agents, one or two assigned to watch over four to six pens each holding 20 to 30 children.
Some of these kids aren't out of diapers. When Michelle Brane of the Women's Refugee Commission checked in on a girl estimated by CBP to be 2, she discovered that a group of teenage girls had been taking turns caring for her for three days. She said that CBP officials had done nothing more than check off the girl's name at roll call.
President Donald Trump has all but admitted he's using family separation as a negotiating tactic to get immigration legislation he wants. That's reprehensible. Kids shouldn't be used as political pawns. And "whatever" isn't an acceptable policy response when the government separates children from their families.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
I've had a chance over the past few days to see what happens to kids right after they're separated from their parents by US immigration officials. White House chief of staff John Kelly said we shouldn't worry about these kids because they'll be "put into foster care or whatever."
"Whatever" seems to be what they're aiming for, judging from my time interviewing children and their parents in McAllen, Texas. There are no specific services for kids at US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) detention facilities there - both the short-term holding cells known informally as the "freezers" because they are kept so cold and the larger processing center. No recreational areas, no place to run around and play, and no toys or books of any kind. "We're not set up as a child care facility," a CBP official told us.
These are intended to be short-term detention facilities: federal law requires CBP to transfer unaccompanied children to the Department of Health and Human Services "not later than 72 hours" after authorities know they're separated from their parents.
But three days alone is a long time for any kid. Consider the five-year-old boy I met on Friday. He'd been sitting in a caged area for nearly a day with older children he didn't know; nobody told him where his mother was or what would happen to him.
Now that CBP is effectively running day care for kids too young for grade school, you'd think they might at least bring in staff with the skills to look after children. But as I sat in CBP's Ursula processing center most of Friday, the only staff I saw were uniformed agents, one or two assigned to watch over four to six pens each holding 20 to 30 children.
Some of these kids aren't out of diapers. When Michelle Brane of the Women's Refugee Commission checked in on a girl estimated by CBP to be 2, she discovered that a group of teenage girls had been taking turns caring for her for three days. She said that CBP officials had done nothing more than check off the girl's name at roll call.
President Donald Trump has all but admitted he's using family separation as a negotiating tactic to get immigration legislation he wants. That's reprehensible. Kids shouldn't be used as political pawns. And "whatever" isn't an acceptable policy response when the government separates children from their families.
I've had a chance over the past few days to see what happens to kids right after they're separated from their parents by US immigration officials. White House chief of staff John Kelly said we shouldn't worry about these kids because they'll be "put into foster care or whatever."
"Whatever" seems to be what they're aiming for, judging from my time interviewing children and their parents in McAllen, Texas. There are no specific services for kids at US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) detention facilities there - both the short-term holding cells known informally as the "freezers" because they are kept so cold and the larger processing center. No recreational areas, no place to run around and play, and no toys or books of any kind. "We're not set up as a child care facility," a CBP official told us.
These are intended to be short-term detention facilities: federal law requires CBP to transfer unaccompanied children to the Department of Health and Human Services "not later than 72 hours" after authorities know they're separated from their parents.
But three days alone is a long time for any kid. Consider the five-year-old boy I met on Friday. He'd been sitting in a caged area for nearly a day with older children he didn't know; nobody told him where his mother was or what would happen to him.
Now that CBP is effectively running day care for kids too young for grade school, you'd think they might at least bring in staff with the skills to look after children. But as I sat in CBP's Ursula processing center most of Friday, the only staff I saw were uniformed agents, one or two assigned to watch over four to six pens each holding 20 to 30 children.
Some of these kids aren't out of diapers. When Michelle Brane of the Women's Refugee Commission checked in on a girl estimated by CBP to be 2, she discovered that a group of teenage girls had been taking turns caring for her for three days. She said that CBP officials had done nothing more than check off the girl's name at roll call.
President Donald Trump has all but admitted he's using family separation as a negotiating tactic to get immigration legislation he wants. That's reprehensible. Kids shouldn't be used as political pawns. And "whatever" isn't an acceptable policy response when the government separates children from their families.