"She deserves outrage, but because of her lack of morality, not her political party." (Photo: Screenshot)
Apr 13, 2018
School segregation is kind of like war.
When asked point blank, no one wants to admit to liking it.
To paraphrase Motown singer songwriter Edwin Starr:
"Segregation. Huh, Good God.
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing."
However, when it comes to supporting actual integration programs or even just education policies that don't make segregation worse, no one in politics really gives a crap.
Both Republicans and Democrats are heavily invested in ways to divide up school students along racial and economic lines - whether they be charter and voucher schools or strategic disinvestment in the public schools that serve the poor and minorities and hording resources for wealthy whites.
That's why it's somewhat shocking to hear the outrage over Trump judicial nominee Wendy Vitter.
\u201cWATCH: During her confirmation hearing this morning (yes, this morning \u2013 in 2018), judicial nominee Wendy Vitter refused to say whether she agreed with the result in Brown v. Board of Education. #UnfitToJudge\u201d— The Leadership Conference (@The Leadership Conference) 1523471223
Trump nominated the extremely partisan justice for a federal judgeship in Louisiana. Yet during a Senate hearing Wednesday, Vitter refused to answer a question from Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) about whether or not she believed the Supreme Court was right in its landmark 1954 decision, Brown v. Board of Education.
The decision overturned the excuse that we could educate white and black people in different facilities so long as they were "separate but equal." In effect, it said that when we educate the races separately, their schools will never be equal.
And Vitter couldn't bring herself to affirm this ruling.
"If I start commenting on 'I agree with this case' or don't agree with this case,' I think we get into a slippery slope," she said.
"I don't mean to be coy, but I think I get into a difficult area when I start commenting on Supreme Court decisions which are correctly decided and which I may disagree with," Vitter said.
She added that the ruling was "binding" and that she would uphold it if confirmed as a judge.
And there we have it, people.
That's where the bar is set during the Trump administration.
You no longer need to pretend to be against school segregation.
On the one hand, it's more honest than most people in the political arena.
On the other, how far have we sunk when you don't even need to feign decency in order to expect having a chance of Congress confirming you?
Let me be clear. Vitter's nomination should not be approved.
Congress should draw a line in the sand and say that it cannot accept people who do not share bedrock American values on the bench.
And that is the barest minimum.
That is merely decorum.
It's like having the decency to condemn Nazis - something else Trump can't bring himself to do.
What actually happens to Vitter will probably be determined by the degree of backlash against her.
As of Thursday afternoon, the video clip of Vitter's comments about Brown V. Board had more than 1.7 million views, and was retweeted over 13,000 times.
A few months ago, another Trump judicial nominee, Matthew Petersen, withdrew from consideration after a video in which he couldn't answer basic legal questions went viral.
But even if this reprehensible person who has no right sitting in judgement over anything more taxing than a checkbook gets turned away from the bench, we'll still be far from where we need to be on school segregation.
Despite Brown vs. Board, many of our schools today are more segregated - not less - than they were in the 1960s.
And instead of putting on our big boy pants and tackling the issue, we've gone in the opposite direction.
On both sides of the aisle, lawmakers support charter schools. Republicans and a few Democrats support school vouchers. And just about everyone is fine with the fact that our public schools serve vastly disproportionate racial and economic populations yet rely on local tax revenues for funding and thus are inequitably resourced.
In every case, these policies make segregation worse. Yet hardly anyone in the halls of power or in the media even admits it is happening.
At most, you get a news story every anniversary of Brown v. Board about the increased segregation and a journalistic shrug. Well, we don't know how to solve that one...
Yes, we do!
We need to integrate - not segregate.
We need to end school privatization.
We need to redraw district boundaries.
We need to audit school policies that keep the races apart within districts by building or by class.
And we need robust, equitable funding that can't be manipulated to favor wealthy white kids.
That will take a lot more moral courage than partisan outrage against Vitter.
Oh, she deserves outrage, but because of her lack of morality, not her political party.
This can no longer be about if you're political football team is in power or not.
It has to be about what's right and wrong.
Caring about integration should be part of what it means to be an American - like freedom, justice and apple pie.
If it isn't, we have a lot worse problems than one reprehensible would-be judge.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Steven Singer
Steven Singer is a husband, father, teacher, blogger and education advocate. Singer is an 8th grade Language Arts teacher in western Pennsylvania. He is a Nationally Board Certified Teacher and has an MAT from the University of Pittsburgh. He is Director of the Research and Blogging Committee for the Badass Teachers Association. He is co-founder of the Pennsylvania-based education budget advocacy group T.E.A.C.H. (Tell Everyone All Cuts Hurt). He often writes at his own blog, gadflyonthewallblog.com.
School segregation is kind of like war.
When asked point blank, no one wants to admit to liking it.
To paraphrase Motown singer songwriter Edwin Starr:
"Segregation. Huh, Good God.
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing."
However, when it comes to supporting actual integration programs or even just education policies that don't make segregation worse, no one in politics really gives a crap.
Both Republicans and Democrats are heavily invested in ways to divide up school students along racial and economic lines - whether they be charter and voucher schools or strategic disinvestment in the public schools that serve the poor and minorities and hording resources for wealthy whites.
That's why it's somewhat shocking to hear the outrage over Trump judicial nominee Wendy Vitter.
\u201cWATCH: During her confirmation hearing this morning (yes, this morning \u2013 in 2018), judicial nominee Wendy Vitter refused to say whether she agreed with the result in Brown v. Board of Education. #UnfitToJudge\u201d— The Leadership Conference (@The Leadership Conference) 1523471223
Trump nominated the extremely partisan justice for a federal judgeship in Louisiana. Yet during a Senate hearing Wednesday, Vitter refused to answer a question from Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) about whether or not she believed the Supreme Court was right in its landmark 1954 decision, Brown v. Board of Education.
The decision overturned the excuse that we could educate white and black people in different facilities so long as they were "separate but equal." In effect, it said that when we educate the races separately, their schools will never be equal.
And Vitter couldn't bring herself to affirm this ruling.
"If I start commenting on 'I agree with this case' or don't agree with this case,' I think we get into a slippery slope," she said.
"I don't mean to be coy, but I think I get into a difficult area when I start commenting on Supreme Court decisions which are correctly decided and which I may disagree with," Vitter said.
She added that the ruling was "binding" and that she would uphold it if confirmed as a judge.
And there we have it, people.
That's where the bar is set during the Trump administration.
You no longer need to pretend to be against school segregation.
On the one hand, it's more honest than most people in the political arena.
On the other, how far have we sunk when you don't even need to feign decency in order to expect having a chance of Congress confirming you?
Let me be clear. Vitter's nomination should not be approved.
Congress should draw a line in the sand and say that it cannot accept people who do not share bedrock American values on the bench.
And that is the barest minimum.
That is merely decorum.
It's like having the decency to condemn Nazis - something else Trump can't bring himself to do.
What actually happens to Vitter will probably be determined by the degree of backlash against her.
As of Thursday afternoon, the video clip of Vitter's comments about Brown V. Board had more than 1.7 million views, and was retweeted over 13,000 times.
A few months ago, another Trump judicial nominee, Matthew Petersen, withdrew from consideration after a video in which he couldn't answer basic legal questions went viral.
But even if this reprehensible person who has no right sitting in judgement over anything more taxing than a checkbook gets turned away from the bench, we'll still be far from where we need to be on school segregation.
Despite Brown vs. Board, many of our schools today are more segregated - not less - than they were in the 1960s.
And instead of putting on our big boy pants and tackling the issue, we've gone in the opposite direction.
On both sides of the aisle, lawmakers support charter schools. Republicans and a few Democrats support school vouchers. And just about everyone is fine with the fact that our public schools serve vastly disproportionate racial and economic populations yet rely on local tax revenues for funding and thus are inequitably resourced.
In every case, these policies make segregation worse. Yet hardly anyone in the halls of power or in the media even admits it is happening.
At most, you get a news story every anniversary of Brown v. Board about the increased segregation and a journalistic shrug. Well, we don't know how to solve that one...
Yes, we do!
We need to integrate - not segregate.
We need to end school privatization.
We need to redraw district boundaries.
We need to audit school policies that keep the races apart within districts by building or by class.
And we need robust, equitable funding that can't be manipulated to favor wealthy white kids.
That will take a lot more moral courage than partisan outrage against Vitter.
Oh, she deserves outrage, but because of her lack of morality, not her political party.
This can no longer be about if you're political football team is in power or not.
It has to be about what's right and wrong.
Caring about integration should be part of what it means to be an American - like freedom, justice and apple pie.
If it isn't, we have a lot worse problems than one reprehensible would-be judge.
Steven Singer
Steven Singer is a husband, father, teacher, blogger and education advocate. Singer is an 8th grade Language Arts teacher in western Pennsylvania. He is a Nationally Board Certified Teacher and has an MAT from the University of Pittsburgh. He is Director of the Research and Blogging Committee for the Badass Teachers Association. He is co-founder of the Pennsylvania-based education budget advocacy group T.E.A.C.H. (Tell Everyone All Cuts Hurt). He often writes at his own blog, gadflyonthewallblog.com.
School segregation is kind of like war.
When asked point blank, no one wants to admit to liking it.
To paraphrase Motown singer songwriter Edwin Starr:
"Segregation. Huh, Good God.
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing."
However, when it comes to supporting actual integration programs or even just education policies that don't make segregation worse, no one in politics really gives a crap.
Both Republicans and Democrats are heavily invested in ways to divide up school students along racial and economic lines - whether they be charter and voucher schools or strategic disinvestment in the public schools that serve the poor and minorities and hording resources for wealthy whites.
That's why it's somewhat shocking to hear the outrage over Trump judicial nominee Wendy Vitter.
\u201cWATCH: During her confirmation hearing this morning (yes, this morning \u2013 in 2018), judicial nominee Wendy Vitter refused to say whether she agreed with the result in Brown v. Board of Education. #UnfitToJudge\u201d— The Leadership Conference (@The Leadership Conference) 1523471223
Trump nominated the extremely partisan justice for a federal judgeship in Louisiana. Yet during a Senate hearing Wednesday, Vitter refused to answer a question from Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) about whether or not she believed the Supreme Court was right in its landmark 1954 decision, Brown v. Board of Education.
The decision overturned the excuse that we could educate white and black people in different facilities so long as they were "separate but equal." In effect, it said that when we educate the races separately, their schools will never be equal.
And Vitter couldn't bring herself to affirm this ruling.
"If I start commenting on 'I agree with this case' or don't agree with this case,' I think we get into a slippery slope," she said.
"I don't mean to be coy, but I think I get into a difficult area when I start commenting on Supreme Court decisions which are correctly decided and which I may disagree with," Vitter said.
She added that the ruling was "binding" and that she would uphold it if confirmed as a judge.
And there we have it, people.
That's where the bar is set during the Trump administration.
You no longer need to pretend to be against school segregation.
On the one hand, it's more honest than most people in the political arena.
On the other, how far have we sunk when you don't even need to feign decency in order to expect having a chance of Congress confirming you?
Let me be clear. Vitter's nomination should not be approved.
Congress should draw a line in the sand and say that it cannot accept people who do not share bedrock American values on the bench.
And that is the barest minimum.
That is merely decorum.
It's like having the decency to condemn Nazis - something else Trump can't bring himself to do.
What actually happens to Vitter will probably be determined by the degree of backlash against her.
As of Thursday afternoon, the video clip of Vitter's comments about Brown V. Board had more than 1.7 million views, and was retweeted over 13,000 times.
A few months ago, another Trump judicial nominee, Matthew Petersen, withdrew from consideration after a video in which he couldn't answer basic legal questions went viral.
But even if this reprehensible person who has no right sitting in judgement over anything more taxing than a checkbook gets turned away from the bench, we'll still be far from where we need to be on school segregation.
Despite Brown vs. Board, many of our schools today are more segregated - not less - than they were in the 1960s.
And instead of putting on our big boy pants and tackling the issue, we've gone in the opposite direction.
On both sides of the aisle, lawmakers support charter schools. Republicans and a few Democrats support school vouchers. And just about everyone is fine with the fact that our public schools serve vastly disproportionate racial and economic populations yet rely on local tax revenues for funding and thus are inequitably resourced.
In every case, these policies make segregation worse. Yet hardly anyone in the halls of power or in the media even admits it is happening.
At most, you get a news story every anniversary of Brown v. Board about the increased segregation and a journalistic shrug. Well, we don't know how to solve that one...
Yes, we do!
We need to integrate - not segregate.
We need to end school privatization.
We need to redraw district boundaries.
We need to audit school policies that keep the races apart within districts by building or by class.
And we need robust, equitable funding that can't be manipulated to favor wealthy white kids.
That will take a lot more moral courage than partisan outrage against Vitter.
Oh, she deserves outrage, but because of her lack of morality, not her political party.
This can no longer be about if you're political football team is in power or not.
It has to be about what's right and wrong.
Caring about integration should be part of what it means to be an American - like freedom, justice and apple pie.
If it isn't, we have a lot worse problems than one reprehensible would-be judge.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.