Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

36 hours left in this Mid-Year Campaign. This is our hour of need.
If you value independent journalism, please support Common Dreams.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

"The latest evidence of the Republican Party’s anti-democratic activities comes from a federal court ruling, issued Tuesday, which found that North Carolina Republicans deliberately drew congressional district boundaries in order to benefit their own party."(Photo: Common Cause NC/Twitter)

"The latest evidence of the Republican Party’s anti-democratic activities comes from a federal court ruling, issued Tuesday, which found that North Carolina Republicans deliberately drew congressional district boundaries in order to benefit their own party."(Photo: Common Cause NC/Twitter)

When Will Democrats Start #Resisting GOP Voter Suppression?

Americans love democracy, at least in principle.

Remember all those pictures of smiling Iraqi citizens proudly holding up their blue, ink-stained fingers when they voted for the first time after the fall of Saddam Hussein? The Republicans – and far too many Democrats – who had supported the U.S. invasion of Iraq hoped those vivid images would appeal to the democracy-loving instincts of the American people.

Americans do love democracy, at least in principle, although they’ve long abandoned their support for that misguided war. So how is it that the party that distributed those photos of blue fingers has also been able to engage in a decades-long assault on democracy at home, without paying a political price? And why isn’t the party at the losing end of those machinations doing more about it?

Photo credit: U.S. Army, Sgt. Jerry Saslav

Against Democracy

The latest evidence of the Republican Party’s anti-democratic activities comes from a federal court ruling, issued Tuesday, which found that North Carolina Republicans deliberately drew congressional district boundaries in order to benefit their own party.

Judges usually to infer undemocratic motives by the way districts are drawn. But North Carolina Republicans made it easy for the judges in this case statements like this one, from state representative David Lewis, who was responsible for redistricting. “I think electing Republicans is better than electing Democrats,” said Lewis. “So I drew this map to help foster what I think is better for the country.”

Well, okay then.

The Supreme Court already ruled against North Carolina Republicans in 2017, finding that they had discriminated against black voters in drawing up congressional districts. That limited the electoral participation of a predominantly Democratic voting bloc. Earlier that year, a federal district court found that Republicans had similarly discriminated against black and Latino voters.

This kind of dirty politics doesn’t happen by accident.David Daley has written a detailed account of “REDMAP,” the GOP plan to regain political power by redrawing district lines in their own favor. Daley’s book is entitled “Ratf*cked,” and we interviewed him about it here.

An analysis by New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice found that, nationwide, partisan gerrymandering has given Republicans 16-17 additional congressional seats.

Cage Match

As another court decision reminds us, this sort of thing is nothing new for Republicans. This week another judge lifted a consent decree against the Republican National Committee that had been in place since 1982. That’s when the RNC was barred from their practice of sending intimidating mailers to African-American voters and hiring armed, off-duty law enforcement officers to stand watch at polling places in minority neighborhoods.

A related tactic, known as “voter caging,” consists of sending mass mailings to neighborhoods that typically vote against your party; minority neighborhoods are the typical target.  When mailers are returned, voters are then struck from the rolls.

By targeting certain neighborhoods rather than others, voter caging is used for partisan purposes.  Worse, as the Brennan Center explains, this tactic is often targeted against registered members of a political party.

As the Brennan Center notes, caging is a “notoriously unreliable” technique for legitimately purging ineligible voters. It’s extremely effective, however, in helping one party gain an unfair advantage over another.  That was also true of an Ohio Republican scheme, led by Secretary of State Jon Husted, which gamed election law to purge legally-registered voters for infrequent voting.

A Reuters investigation found, unsurprisingly, that Ohio Republicans benefited from Husted’s actions.  Two million voters were purged from Ohio’s rolls between 2011 and 2016, according to Ari Berman of The Nation, with 1.2 million of them purged for infrequent voting.

But, as bad as things are for Democrats today, they could get much worse very quickly. If the Supreme Court rules in Ohio’s favor, caging and its variants could become common practice in the two-thirds of state governments controlled by Republicans.

Nor is the recent disbanding of Donald Trump’s “voter fraud commission,” which under Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach had sought to enact some of these tactics on a national level, necessarily good news for Democrats. By handing over its responsibilities to the Department of Homeland Security, Trump could be putting the machinery of the national security state behind these antidemocratic efforts.

The Democracy Campaign

Democrats have not always been angels when it comes to gerrymandering and related tactics. Far from it. But far more often than not, especially in recent years, they’ve been the victims of a range of voter suppression tactics that includes gerrymandering, caging, and understaffing minority-neighborhood polling places. So why aren’t they making an issue of it?

While many voters are still unaware of more esoteric techniques like caging, an anti-gerrymandering agenda would be very popular with voters, according to a bipartisan poll released last September by Democratic researcher Celinda Lake and Republican analyst Ashlee Rich Stephenson.  Lake and Stephenson found that 80 percent of Democrats, 68 percent of independents, and 65 percent of Republicans would support a Supreme Court move to end partisan gerrymandering.

Said Lake: “This issue has bipartisan consensus even among partisan voters.”

To be clear, these issues aren’t the only thing Democrats should be talking about. In that sense, Jeff Greenfield is right when he writes, “What ails the party – at every level – goes far beyond alleged Republican skullduggery. And a diagnosis of those ills requires an understanding of what the past decade has wrought.”

The party’s losses include, at its high point, more than 1000 seats in state legislatures. Two-thirds of governorships and two-thirds of state legislatures are now in Republican hands, and it is those victories that allowed Republicans to engage in election-related “skullduggery.

To make matters even worse for Democrats, President Trump is hastily filling vacant judgeships all over the country. That will make it harder to pursue democratic claims in the courts.

The Democracy Campaign

Democrats can’t passively count on the “Rising American Electorate” of unmarried women, people of color, and millennials to rescue them.  They need to offer these voters a compelling agenda – one that motivates them to overcome the many obstacles to voting that are being placed in their way.

Democrats need to come up with social and economic policies that are strong enough to bring their base to the polls.  But these voters also deserve to know that their rights are being systematically suppressed – and that they can do something about it by voting incumbents out of office.

The party that gave us those “blue finger” pictures is now sticking its finger in the eye of American democracy. So why are Democrats talking about this issue every day?  Somebody should.

If party leaders won’t campaign on this issue, insurgent candidates will have to do it for them. If party leaders won’t organize voter registration efforts to counteract Republican suppression, movement activists will have to do it for them. And if party leaders don’t understand what they need to do to win elections, maybe it’s time to choose some new party leaders.


Richard J Eskow

Richard Eskow

Richard (RJ) Eskow is a freelance writer. Much of his work can be found on eskow.substack.com. His weekly program, The Zero Hour, can be found on cable television, radio, Spotify, and podcast media. He is a senior advisor with Social Security Works.

Just ONE DAY left in our crucial Mid-Year Campaign and we might not make it without your help.
Who funds our independent journalism? Readers like you who believe in our mission: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. No corporate advertisers. No billionaire founder. Our non-partisan, nonprofit media model has only one source of revenue: The people who read and value this work and our mission. That's it.
And the model is simple: If everyone just gives whatever amount they can afford and think is reasonable—$3, $9, $29, or more—we can continue. If not enough do, we go dark.

All the small gifts add up to something otherwise impossible. Please join us today. Donate to Common Dreams. This is crunch time. We need you now.

'We Will Fight! We Will Win!': Nearly 200 Abortion Rights Defenders Arrested in DC

"If people don't see the rage," said one woman at the protest, "nothing changes."

Jon Queally ·


Federal Abortion Ban Desired by GOP Would Increase Maternal Deaths by 24%: Study

"Pregnancy shouldn't kill people—in fact, in other rich countries it very rarely does," said the lead author of the new analysis.

Jake Johnson ·


Naomi Klein: The US Is in the Midst of a 'Shock-and-Awe Judicial Coup'

"The rolling judicial coup coming from this court is by no means over," warned the author of "The Shock Doctrine."

Jake Johnson ·


Markey, Bowman Join Climate Coalition in Urging SCOTUS Expansion

"We cannot sit idly by," said Markey, "as extremists on the Supreme Court eviscerate the authorities that the government has had for decades to combat climate change and reduce pollution."

Brett Wilkins ·


Ocasio-Cortez Says US 'Witnessing a Judicial Coup in Process'

"It is our duty to check the Court's gross overreach of power in violating people's inalienable rights and seizing for itself the powers of Congress and the president."

Brett Wilkins ·

Common Dreams Logo