"Even if the timing had not made the move gauche, it was objectionable on a large number of grounds," writes Juan Cole on President Donald's Trump pardoning of former sheriff Joe Arpaio. (Photo: NASA)
Trump Exploits Harvey Victims in Stealth Pardon of Arpaio
Eminent climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State noticed not one but two horrible things about Friday evening.
You never want to see a Hurricane that looks like this at landfall.
I fear #Harvey will take a heavy toll. Be safe folks. pic.twitter.com/1r0CXvhghm-- Michael E. Mann (@MichaelEMann) August 26, 2017
Eminent climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State noticed not one but two horrible things about Friday evening.
The second one was that Trump dropped a load of shady announcements while eyes and cameras were on the Texas coast:
That's right, instead of hunkering down with an emergency response team or consulting FEMA as category 4 Hurricane Harvey made landfall, Trump's mind was on voiding the criminal contempt of court verdict against former sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County.
Even if the timing had not made the move gauche, it was objectionable on a large number of grounds.
First, the criminal contempt of court sentence was issued by the judiciary, and Trump voided it even though Arpaio had not been sentenced or served any time. Many observers saw this high-handed intervention not as a pardon so much as it was a blatant shredding of the separation of powers.
Second, Arpaio is charged with a whole series of serious offenses. Although he is no longer sheriff, his legacy is a dangerous one and you would not want to see other sheriffs encouraged that they could get away with this behavior.
The Phoenix New Times newspaper has been reporting on Arpaio for years, and its editors recalled his many alleged crimes.
Arpaio illegally and routinely engaged in profiling Arizona Latinos, arresting them for existing while Latin.
For instance, he rounded up people and put them in a tent city that Arpaio himself admitted was a "concentration camp."
Or, there was that suspiciously high rate of "suicides" among the prisoners in his jail, far more than in any similar institution.
Arpaio even wrongly arrested the reporters the newspaper sent to cover him, and the county had to pay the newspaper's owners nearly $4 million in damages for false arrest.
Even after having been found guilty of profiling Latinos, he went on doing it. That behavior resulted in his being found guilty of criminal contempt of court.
And that was when Trump cavalierly wished the people of Texas "good luck" and turned his attention to pardoning Arpaio.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Eminent climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State noticed not one but two horrible things about Friday evening.
The second one was that Trump dropped a load of shady announcements while eyes and cameras were on the Texas coast:
That's right, instead of hunkering down with an emergency response team or consulting FEMA as category 4 Hurricane Harvey made landfall, Trump's mind was on voiding the criminal contempt of court verdict against former sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County.
Even if the timing had not made the move gauche, it was objectionable on a large number of grounds.
First, the criminal contempt of court sentence was issued by the judiciary, and Trump voided it even though Arpaio had not been sentenced or served any time. Many observers saw this high-handed intervention not as a pardon so much as it was a blatant shredding of the separation of powers.
Second, Arpaio is charged with a whole series of serious offenses. Although he is no longer sheriff, his legacy is a dangerous one and you would not want to see other sheriffs encouraged that they could get away with this behavior.
The Phoenix New Times newspaper has been reporting on Arpaio for years, and its editors recalled his many alleged crimes.
Arpaio illegally and routinely engaged in profiling Arizona Latinos, arresting them for existing while Latin.
For instance, he rounded up people and put them in a tent city that Arpaio himself admitted was a "concentration camp."
Or, there was that suspiciously high rate of "suicides" among the prisoners in his jail, far more than in any similar institution.
Arpaio even wrongly arrested the reporters the newspaper sent to cover him, and the county had to pay the newspaper's owners nearly $4 million in damages for false arrest.
Even after having been found guilty of profiling Latinos, he went on doing it. That behavior resulted in his being found guilty of criminal contempt of court.
And that was when Trump cavalierly wished the people of Texas "good luck" and turned his attention to pardoning Arpaio.
Eminent climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State noticed not one but two horrible things about Friday evening.
The second one was that Trump dropped a load of shady announcements while eyes and cameras were on the Texas coast:
That's right, instead of hunkering down with an emergency response team or consulting FEMA as category 4 Hurricane Harvey made landfall, Trump's mind was on voiding the criminal contempt of court verdict against former sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County.
Even if the timing had not made the move gauche, it was objectionable on a large number of grounds.
First, the criminal contempt of court sentence was issued by the judiciary, and Trump voided it even though Arpaio had not been sentenced or served any time. Many observers saw this high-handed intervention not as a pardon so much as it was a blatant shredding of the separation of powers.
Second, Arpaio is charged with a whole series of serious offenses. Although he is no longer sheriff, his legacy is a dangerous one and you would not want to see other sheriffs encouraged that they could get away with this behavior.
The Phoenix New Times newspaper has been reporting on Arpaio for years, and its editors recalled his many alleged crimes.
Arpaio illegally and routinely engaged in profiling Arizona Latinos, arresting them for existing while Latin.
For instance, he rounded up people and put them in a tent city that Arpaio himself admitted was a "concentration camp."
Or, there was that suspiciously high rate of "suicides" among the prisoners in his jail, far more than in any similar institution.
Arpaio even wrongly arrested the reporters the newspaper sent to cover him, and the county had to pay the newspaper's owners nearly $4 million in damages for false arrest.
Even after having been found guilty of profiling Latinos, he went on doing it. That behavior resulted in his being found guilty of criminal contempt of court.
And that was when Trump cavalierly wished the people of Texas "good luck" and turned his attention to pardoning Arpaio.