SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"Even if the timing had not made the move gauche, it was objectionable on a large number of grounds," writes Juan Cole on President Donald's Trump pardoning of former sheriff Joe Arpaio. (Photo: NASA)
Eminent climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State noticed not one but two horrible things about Friday evening.
You never want to see a Hurricane that looks like this at landfall.
I fear #Harvey will take a heavy toll. Be safe folks. pic.twitter.com/1r0CXvhghm-- Michael E. Mann (@MichaelEMann) August 26, 2017
Eminent climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State noticed not one but two horrible things about Friday evening.
\u201cYou never want to see a Hurricane that looks like this at landfall.\nI fear #Harvey will take a heavy toll. Be safe folks.\u201d— Prof Michael E. Mann (@Prof Michael E. Mann) 1503716650
The second one was that Trump dropped a load of shady announcements while eyes and cameras were on the Texas coast:
\u201cBush may have botched #Katrina, but at least he didn't exploit in heinous manner Trump has just exploited #Harvey: https://t.co/k8Sih3iTc3\u201d— Prof Michael E. Mann (@Prof Michael E. Mann) 1503717645
That's right, instead of hunkering down with an emergency response team or consulting FEMA as category 4 Hurricane Harvey made landfall, Trump's mind was on voiding the criminal contempt of court verdict against former sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County.
Even if the timing had not made the move gauche, it was objectionable on a large number of grounds.
First, the criminal contempt of court sentence was issued by the judiciary, and Trump voided it even though Arpaio had not been sentenced or served any time. Many observers saw this high-handed intervention not as a pardon so much as it was a blatant shredding of the separation of powers.
Second, Arpaio is charged with a whole series of serious offenses. Although he is no longer sheriff, his legacy is a dangerous one and you would not want to see other sheriffs encouraged that they could get away with this behavior.
The Phoenix New Times newspaper has been reporting on Arpaio for years, and its editors recalled his many alleged crimes.
Arpaio illegally and routinely engaged in profiling Arizona Latinos, arresting them for existing while Latin.
For instance, he rounded up people and put them in a tent city that Arpaio himself admitted was a "concentration camp."
Or, there was that suspiciously high rate of "suicides" among the prisoners in his jail, far more than in any similar institution.
Arpaio even wrongly arrested the reporters the newspaper sent to cover him, and the county had to pay the newspaper's owners nearly $4 million in damages for false arrest.
Even after having been found guilty of profiling Latinos, he went on doing it. That behavior resulted in his being found guilty of criminal contempt of court.
And that was when Trump cavalierly wished the people of Texas "good luck" and turned his attention to pardoning Arpaio.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Eminent climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State noticed not one but two horrible things about Friday evening.
\u201cYou never want to see a Hurricane that looks like this at landfall.\nI fear #Harvey will take a heavy toll. Be safe folks.\u201d— Prof Michael E. Mann (@Prof Michael E. Mann) 1503716650
The second one was that Trump dropped a load of shady announcements while eyes and cameras were on the Texas coast:
\u201cBush may have botched #Katrina, but at least he didn't exploit in heinous manner Trump has just exploited #Harvey: https://t.co/k8Sih3iTc3\u201d— Prof Michael E. Mann (@Prof Michael E. Mann) 1503717645
That's right, instead of hunkering down with an emergency response team or consulting FEMA as category 4 Hurricane Harvey made landfall, Trump's mind was on voiding the criminal contempt of court verdict against former sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County.
Even if the timing had not made the move gauche, it was objectionable on a large number of grounds.
First, the criminal contempt of court sentence was issued by the judiciary, and Trump voided it even though Arpaio had not been sentenced or served any time. Many observers saw this high-handed intervention not as a pardon so much as it was a blatant shredding of the separation of powers.
Second, Arpaio is charged with a whole series of serious offenses. Although he is no longer sheriff, his legacy is a dangerous one and you would not want to see other sheriffs encouraged that they could get away with this behavior.
The Phoenix New Times newspaper has been reporting on Arpaio for years, and its editors recalled his many alleged crimes.
Arpaio illegally and routinely engaged in profiling Arizona Latinos, arresting them for existing while Latin.
For instance, he rounded up people and put them in a tent city that Arpaio himself admitted was a "concentration camp."
Or, there was that suspiciously high rate of "suicides" among the prisoners in his jail, far more than in any similar institution.
Arpaio even wrongly arrested the reporters the newspaper sent to cover him, and the county had to pay the newspaper's owners nearly $4 million in damages for false arrest.
Even after having been found guilty of profiling Latinos, he went on doing it. That behavior resulted in his being found guilty of criminal contempt of court.
And that was when Trump cavalierly wished the people of Texas "good luck" and turned his attention to pardoning Arpaio.
Eminent climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State noticed not one but two horrible things about Friday evening.
\u201cYou never want to see a Hurricane that looks like this at landfall.\nI fear #Harvey will take a heavy toll. Be safe folks.\u201d— Prof Michael E. Mann (@Prof Michael E. Mann) 1503716650
The second one was that Trump dropped a load of shady announcements while eyes and cameras were on the Texas coast:
\u201cBush may have botched #Katrina, but at least he didn't exploit in heinous manner Trump has just exploited #Harvey: https://t.co/k8Sih3iTc3\u201d— Prof Michael E. Mann (@Prof Michael E. Mann) 1503717645
That's right, instead of hunkering down with an emergency response team or consulting FEMA as category 4 Hurricane Harvey made landfall, Trump's mind was on voiding the criminal contempt of court verdict against former sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County.
Even if the timing had not made the move gauche, it was objectionable on a large number of grounds.
First, the criminal contempt of court sentence was issued by the judiciary, and Trump voided it even though Arpaio had not been sentenced or served any time. Many observers saw this high-handed intervention not as a pardon so much as it was a blatant shredding of the separation of powers.
Second, Arpaio is charged with a whole series of serious offenses. Although he is no longer sheriff, his legacy is a dangerous one and you would not want to see other sheriffs encouraged that they could get away with this behavior.
The Phoenix New Times newspaper has been reporting on Arpaio for years, and its editors recalled his many alleged crimes.
Arpaio illegally and routinely engaged in profiling Arizona Latinos, arresting them for existing while Latin.
For instance, he rounded up people and put them in a tent city that Arpaio himself admitted was a "concentration camp."
Or, there was that suspiciously high rate of "suicides" among the prisoners in his jail, far more than in any similar institution.
Arpaio even wrongly arrested the reporters the newspaper sent to cover him, and the county had to pay the newspaper's owners nearly $4 million in damages for false arrest.
Even after having been found guilty of profiling Latinos, he went on doing it. That behavior resulted in his being found guilty of criminal contempt of court.
And that was when Trump cavalierly wished the people of Texas "good luck" and turned his attention to pardoning Arpaio.