Trump and the Art of the Lie
As a presidential candidate last year, Donald Trump said, "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters." He didn't shoot anyone, but proved that he could say whatever he wanted and still become president, without apology or explanation.
As a presidential candidate last year, Donald Trump said, "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters." He didn't shoot anyone, but proved that he could say whatever he wanted and still become president, without apology or explanation.
This week, when he suddenly fired FBI Director James Comey, Trump made a version of the same boast. The administration said publicly that Trump fired him for his handling of Clinton's e-mails. But everybody understood that what he was really saying was, "I can fire the head of the FBI, give a ludicrous reason, and nothing will happen." The ludicrousness of the reason was not a mistake on his part -- it is an essential part of the power play.
Trump doesn't lie the way that other American politicians lie. This is the insight of Masha Gessen, a Russian and American journalist who is bringing her decades of studying the Kremlin to bear on modern American politics.
Normally, politicians lie because they want to persuade us of the truth of what they are saying. A candidate for Congress will claim that he earned a medal of honor when he did not, so that we will love and revere him. A mayor will claim crime is down, hiding the numbers that show the opposite, so that we will believe he is protecting us and reelect him. When we catch them in a lie, they lose credibility, and we vote them out of office.
But Trump -- like President Vladimir Putin of Russia -- doesn't use words to persuade us of their truth. As Gessen says, "They don't lie to hide the truth but to assert their power over reality." Trump doesn't start with facts and then veer from them -- he operates outside of truth, attacking the possibility of truth, and doesn't care if he is fact-checked; he succeeds the more that we all accept that words are tools, not referents for reality.
He uses words to express power, and to undermine the legitimacy of the state.
When Trump explained firing Comey because of Hillary Clinton's e-mails, of course he was lying. But he wasn't lying because he thought we would believe him. If he wanted to persuade us, why not come up with a better reason?
Instead, because Trump lies to assert power, using the flimsy Clinton excuse is essentially saying, "I can do whatever I want for whatever reason I want." Being obliged to give a reasonable reason would actually be bowing to a kind of constrained power -- the presidency limited by reason, by logic, by reason-giving. He wants us to know he is unconstrained. He wants us to know he can exercise power arbitrarily.
Firing Comey may be the most Trump-like thing Trump has done: His campaign, his rhetoric, it is all about destroying the legitimacy of government institutions. He rails against courts, but he cannot fire judges; he rails against senators, but he cannot fire them, either. Most of the time, he uses words; this week, he used action. He fired the most powerful fireable man in the country, without good reason. He struck with one blow to turn the FBI into an political institution. As we've seen with the Supreme Court, once an institution becomes fundamentally political it is hard to turn back.
Republicans in Congress have been anxiously sitting on the fence for four months, trying to decide whether Trump has gone too far, and they should flee from him. But running away from him -- as with all leaders with dictatorial tendencies -- is dangerous; he will not hesitate to use whatever tools he has to punish those who are disloyal. So instead of leaving him, they use complex sentences that call out, "Not yet, not yet!" His firing "raises questions," and we "might" need an independent investigation. These are the cowards with enormous power over the future of our country.
This may be bigger than Russia, bigger than the health care repeal, bigger than tax laws, because it attacks the heart of the promise of America: a nation ruled by laws and reason, a thoughtful, human nation. We fought a revolution to free ourselves from arbitrary power and the whims of a monarch. We now must fight a new revolution to protect it.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
As a presidential candidate last year, Donald Trump said, "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters." He didn't shoot anyone, but proved that he could say whatever he wanted and still become president, without apology or explanation.
This week, when he suddenly fired FBI Director James Comey, Trump made a version of the same boast. The administration said publicly that Trump fired him for his handling of Clinton's e-mails. But everybody understood that what he was really saying was, "I can fire the head of the FBI, give a ludicrous reason, and nothing will happen." The ludicrousness of the reason was not a mistake on his part -- it is an essential part of the power play.
Trump doesn't lie the way that other American politicians lie. This is the insight of Masha Gessen, a Russian and American journalist who is bringing her decades of studying the Kremlin to bear on modern American politics.
Normally, politicians lie because they want to persuade us of the truth of what they are saying. A candidate for Congress will claim that he earned a medal of honor when he did not, so that we will love and revere him. A mayor will claim crime is down, hiding the numbers that show the opposite, so that we will believe he is protecting us and reelect him. When we catch them in a lie, they lose credibility, and we vote them out of office.
But Trump -- like President Vladimir Putin of Russia -- doesn't use words to persuade us of their truth. As Gessen says, "They don't lie to hide the truth but to assert their power over reality." Trump doesn't start with facts and then veer from them -- he operates outside of truth, attacking the possibility of truth, and doesn't care if he is fact-checked; he succeeds the more that we all accept that words are tools, not referents for reality.
He uses words to express power, and to undermine the legitimacy of the state.
When Trump explained firing Comey because of Hillary Clinton's e-mails, of course he was lying. But he wasn't lying because he thought we would believe him. If he wanted to persuade us, why not come up with a better reason?
Instead, because Trump lies to assert power, using the flimsy Clinton excuse is essentially saying, "I can do whatever I want for whatever reason I want." Being obliged to give a reasonable reason would actually be bowing to a kind of constrained power -- the presidency limited by reason, by logic, by reason-giving. He wants us to know he is unconstrained. He wants us to know he can exercise power arbitrarily.
Firing Comey may be the most Trump-like thing Trump has done: His campaign, his rhetoric, it is all about destroying the legitimacy of government institutions. He rails against courts, but he cannot fire judges; he rails against senators, but he cannot fire them, either. Most of the time, he uses words; this week, he used action. He fired the most powerful fireable man in the country, without good reason. He struck with one blow to turn the FBI into an political institution. As we've seen with the Supreme Court, once an institution becomes fundamentally political it is hard to turn back.
Republicans in Congress have been anxiously sitting on the fence for four months, trying to decide whether Trump has gone too far, and they should flee from him. But running away from him -- as with all leaders with dictatorial tendencies -- is dangerous; he will not hesitate to use whatever tools he has to punish those who are disloyal. So instead of leaving him, they use complex sentences that call out, "Not yet, not yet!" His firing "raises questions," and we "might" need an independent investigation. These are the cowards with enormous power over the future of our country.
This may be bigger than Russia, bigger than the health care repeal, bigger than tax laws, because it attacks the heart of the promise of America: a nation ruled by laws and reason, a thoughtful, human nation. We fought a revolution to free ourselves from arbitrary power and the whims of a monarch. We now must fight a new revolution to protect it.
As a presidential candidate last year, Donald Trump said, "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters." He didn't shoot anyone, but proved that he could say whatever he wanted and still become president, without apology or explanation.
This week, when he suddenly fired FBI Director James Comey, Trump made a version of the same boast. The administration said publicly that Trump fired him for his handling of Clinton's e-mails. But everybody understood that what he was really saying was, "I can fire the head of the FBI, give a ludicrous reason, and nothing will happen." The ludicrousness of the reason was not a mistake on his part -- it is an essential part of the power play.
Trump doesn't lie the way that other American politicians lie. This is the insight of Masha Gessen, a Russian and American journalist who is bringing her decades of studying the Kremlin to bear on modern American politics.
Normally, politicians lie because they want to persuade us of the truth of what they are saying. A candidate for Congress will claim that he earned a medal of honor when he did not, so that we will love and revere him. A mayor will claim crime is down, hiding the numbers that show the opposite, so that we will believe he is protecting us and reelect him. When we catch them in a lie, they lose credibility, and we vote them out of office.
But Trump -- like President Vladimir Putin of Russia -- doesn't use words to persuade us of their truth. As Gessen says, "They don't lie to hide the truth but to assert their power over reality." Trump doesn't start with facts and then veer from them -- he operates outside of truth, attacking the possibility of truth, and doesn't care if he is fact-checked; he succeeds the more that we all accept that words are tools, not referents for reality.
He uses words to express power, and to undermine the legitimacy of the state.
When Trump explained firing Comey because of Hillary Clinton's e-mails, of course he was lying. But he wasn't lying because he thought we would believe him. If he wanted to persuade us, why not come up with a better reason?
Instead, because Trump lies to assert power, using the flimsy Clinton excuse is essentially saying, "I can do whatever I want for whatever reason I want." Being obliged to give a reasonable reason would actually be bowing to a kind of constrained power -- the presidency limited by reason, by logic, by reason-giving. He wants us to know he is unconstrained. He wants us to know he can exercise power arbitrarily.
Firing Comey may be the most Trump-like thing Trump has done: His campaign, his rhetoric, it is all about destroying the legitimacy of government institutions. He rails against courts, but he cannot fire judges; he rails against senators, but he cannot fire them, either. Most of the time, he uses words; this week, he used action. He fired the most powerful fireable man in the country, without good reason. He struck with one blow to turn the FBI into an political institution. As we've seen with the Supreme Court, once an institution becomes fundamentally political it is hard to turn back.
Republicans in Congress have been anxiously sitting on the fence for four months, trying to decide whether Trump has gone too far, and they should flee from him. But running away from him -- as with all leaders with dictatorial tendencies -- is dangerous; he will not hesitate to use whatever tools he has to punish those who are disloyal. So instead of leaving him, they use complex sentences that call out, "Not yet, not yet!" His firing "raises questions," and we "might" need an independent investigation. These are the cowards with enormous power over the future of our country.
This may be bigger than Russia, bigger than the health care repeal, bigger than tax laws, because it attacks the heart of the promise of America: a nation ruled by laws and reason, a thoughtful, human nation. We fought a revolution to free ourselves from arbitrary power and the whims of a monarch. We now must fight a new revolution to protect it.