SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Here's Why the Republican AHCA-But-Worse Plan Should Not Be Passed by the House Today
May 04, 2017
A vote in favor of the American Health Care Act (AHCA) today would be a vote to make the vast majority of Americans poorer, less healthy and more financially insecure.
The AHCA would cost 24 million Americans their health insurance coverage. The majority (14 million) would lose it to breathtakingly large cuts (almost $900 billion over the next decade) to the vital Medicaid program. Further, 7 million Americans would lose the coverage they get through their employer if AHCA passes.
Costs would skyrocket for those who still needed coverage in the nongroup market. A 64 year-old making 175 percent of the federal poverty line would pay $12,900 more each year for the health insurance plan's premiums under AHCA, but would also face deductibles and co-pays that would cost thousands more than they do currently. For the entire nongroup market, out-of-pocket costs after premiums would rise by $25 billion each year by 2026 if AHCA is passed.
On top of this severe degradation of health and financial security, the AHCA would also drag on job-growth in coming years. This drag would occur because the AHCA cuts to Medicaid and insurance subsidies reduce growth in economic activity and job creation far more powerfully than the AHCA tax cuts boost this growth. By 2022, this drag could lower employment by 1.8 million unless some countervailing macroeconomic boost neutralized the AHCA job-losses. This drag on job-growth would felt in nearly every Congressional District.
The tweaks made to the AHCA since March have made it unambiguously worse, not better. Allowing states to tell insurance companies that they no longer have to provide what are defined as "essential health benefits" or provide coverage for those with pre-existing conditions is not a win for health and financial security. Claims that the most-vulnerable and sickest Americans can be held harmless by this provision because money has been allocated for forming "high-risk" pools would be laughable if it was not so damaging to real people. The money allocated for these high-risk pools is wildly insufficient, and there is no serious rationale for segregating the sickest Americans in politically vulnerable coverage schemes unless the plan is eventually to save money by letting them go without insurance.
Further, allowing states to undermine the key regulatory protections introduced in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will degrade the protectiveness of even employer-sponsored health insurance plans. The ACA instituted bans on lifetime limits and capped annual out-of-pocket spending in employer-sponsored plans, but only for essential health benefits. If a state starts stripping these essential health benefits out of regulatory protections, all Americans with employer-sponsored plans will be exposed to greater risk as the ACA bans on lifetime limits and annual out-of-pocket caps will no longer apply.
Congressional Republicans have taken a terrible bill that was rejected by the vast majority of Americans and made it clearly worse. The only people winning from this action would be those who would receive the lion's share of benefits from the hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts that are bundled in the AHCA.
If it passes the House of Representatives today, it will be a terrible day for Americans' health and financial security.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Economic Policy Institute
A vote in favor of the American Health Care Act (AHCA) today would be a vote to make the vast majority of Americans poorer, less healthy and more financially insecure.
The AHCA would cost 24 million Americans their health insurance coverage. The majority (14 million) would lose it to breathtakingly large cuts (almost $900 billion over the next decade) to the vital Medicaid program. Further, 7 million Americans would lose the coverage they get through their employer if AHCA passes.
Costs would skyrocket for those who still needed coverage in the nongroup market. A 64 year-old making 175 percent of the federal poverty line would pay $12,900 more each year for the health insurance plan's premiums under AHCA, but would also face deductibles and co-pays that would cost thousands more than they do currently. For the entire nongroup market, out-of-pocket costs after premiums would rise by $25 billion each year by 2026 if AHCA is passed.
On top of this severe degradation of health and financial security, the AHCA would also drag on job-growth in coming years. This drag would occur because the AHCA cuts to Medicaid and insurance subsidies reduce growth in economic activity and job creation far more powerfully than the AHCA tax cuts boost this growth. By 2022, this drag could lower employment by 1.8 million unless some countervailing macroeconomic boost neutralized the AHCA job-losses. This drag on job-growth would felt in nearly every Congressional District.
The tweaks made to the AHCA since March have made it unambiguously worse, not better. Allowing states to tell insurance companies that they no longer have to provide what are defined as "essential health benefits" or provide coverage for those with pre-existing conditions is not a win for health and financial security. Claims that the most-vulnerable and sickest Americans can be held harmless by this provision because money has been allocated for forming "high-risk" pools would be laughable if it was not so damaging to real people. The money allocated for these high-risk pools is wildly insufficient, and there is no serious rationale for segregating the sickest Americans in politically vulnerable coverage schemes unless the plan is eventually to save money by letting them go without insurance.
Further, allowing states to undermine the key regulatory protections introduced in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will degrade the protectiveness of even employer-sponsored health insurance plans. The ACA instituted bans on lifetime limits and capped annual out-of-pocket spending in employer-sponsored plans, but only for essential health benefits. If a state starts stripping these essential health benefits out of regulatory protections, all Americans with employer-sponsored plans will be exposed to greater risk as the ACA bans on lifetime limits and annual out-of-pocket caps will no longer apply.
Congressional Republicans have taken a terrible bill that was rejected by the vast majority of Americans and made it clearly worse. The only people winning from this action would be those who would receive the lion's share of benefits from the hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts that are bundled in the AHCA.
If it passes the House of Representatives today, it will be a terrible day for Americans' health and financial security.
A vote in favor of the American Health Care Act (AHCA) today would be a vote to make the vast majority of Americans poorer, less healthy and more financially insecure.
The AHCA would cost 24 million Americans their health insurance coverage. The majority (14 million) would lose it to breathtakingly large cuts (almost $900 billion over the next decade) to the vital Medicaid program. Further, 7 million Americans would lose the coverage they get through their employer if AHCA passes.
Costs would skyrocket for those who still needed coverage in the nongroup market. A 64 year-old making 175 percent of the federal poverty line would pay $12,900 more each year for the health insurance plan's premiums under AHCA, but would also face deductibles and co-pays that would cost thousands more than they do currently. For the entire nongroup market, out-of-pocket costs after premiums would rise by $25 billion each year by 2026 if AHCA is passed.
On top of this severe degradation of health and financial security, the AHCA would also drag on job-growth in coming years. This drag would occur because the AHCA cuts to Medicaid and insurance subsidies reduce growth in economic activity and job creation far more powerfully than the AHCA tax cuts boost this growth. By 2022, this drag could lower employment by 1.8 million unless some countervailing macroeconomic boost neutralized the AHCA job-losses. This drag on job-growth would felt in nearly every Congressional District.
The tweaks made to the AHCA since March have made it unambiguously worse, not better. Allowing states to tell insurance companies that they no longer have to provide what are defined as "essential health benefits" or provide coverage for those with pre-existing conditions is not a win for health and financial security. Claims that the most-vulnerable and sickest Americans can be held harmless by this provision because money has been allocated for forming "high-risk" pools would be laughable if it was not so damaging to real people. The money allocated for these high-risk pools is wildly insufficient, and there is no serious rationale for segregating the sickest Americans in politically vulnerable coverage schemes unless the plan is eventually to save money by letting them go without insurance.
Further, allowing states to undermine the key regulatory protections introduced in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will degrade the protectiveness of even employer-sponsored health insurance plans. The ACA instituted bans on lifetime limits and capped annual out-of-pocket spending in employer-sponsored plans, but only for essential health benefits. If a state starts stripping these essential health benefits out of regulatory protections, all Americans with employer-sponsored plans will be exposed to greater risk as the ACA bans on lifetime limits and annual out-of-pocket caps will no longer apply.
Congressional Republicans have taken a terrible bill that was rejected by the vast majority of Americans and made it clearly worse. The only people winning from this action would be those who would receive the lion's share of benefits from the hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts that are bundled in the AHCA.
If it passes the House of Representatives today, it will be a terrible day for Americans' health and financial security.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.